Literature DB >> 29221903

Discrete element analysis is a valid method for computing joint contact stress in the hip before and after acetabular fracture.

Kevin C Townsend1, Holly D Thomas-Aitken1, M James Rudert2, Andrew M Kern1, Michael C Willey2, Donald D Anderson1, Jessica E Goetz3.   

Abstract

Evaluation of abnormalities in joint contact stress that develop after inaccurate reduction of an acetabular fracture may provide a potential means for predicting the risk of developing post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Discrete element analysis (DEA) is a computational technique for calculating intra-articular contact stress distributions in a fraction of the time required to obtain the same information using the more commonly employed finite element analysis technique. The goal of this work was to validate the accuracy of DEA-computed contact stress against physical measurements of contact stress made in cadaveric hips using Tekscan sensors. Four static loading tests in a variety of poses from heel-strike to toe-off were performed in two different cadaveric hip specimens with the acetabulum intact and again with an intentionally malreduced posterior wall acetabular fracture. DEA-computed contact stress was compared on a point-by-point basis to stress measured from the physical experiments. There was good agreement between computed and measured contact stress over the entire contact area (correlation coefficients ranged from 0.88 to 0.99). DEA-computed peak contact stress was within an average of 0.5 MPa (range 0.2-0.8 MPa) of the Tekscan peak stress for intact hips, and within an average of 0.6 MPa (range 0-1.6 MPa) for fractured cases. DEA-computed contact areas were within an average of 33% of the Tekscan-measured areas (range: 1.4-60%). These results indicate that the DEA methodology is a valid method for accurately estimating contact stress in both intact and fractured hips.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular fracture; Contact stress; Discrete element analysis; Hip; Tekscan

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29221903      PMCID: PMC5767141          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  Patient Age and Hip Morphology Alter Joint Mechanics in Computational Models of Patients With Hip Dysplasia.

Authors:  Holly D Thomas-Aitken; Jessica E Goetz; Kevin N Dibbern; Robert W Westermann; Michael C Willey; Timothy S Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Hip Arthroscopy Prior to Periacetabular Osteotomy Does Not Increase Operative Time or Complications: A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Alan G Shamrock; Robert W Westermann; Trevor R Gulbrandsen; Zain M Khazi; Christopher N Carender; Michael C Willey
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021

3.  Isolated changes in femoral version do not alter intra-articular contact mechanics in cadaveric hips.

Authors:  Alex M Meyer; Holly D Thomas-Aitken; Marc J Brouillette; Robert W Westermann; Jessica E Goetz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Joint contact stresses calculated for acetabular dysplasia patients using discrete element analysis are significantly influenced by the applied gait pattern.

Authors:  Holly D Thomas-Aitken; Michael C Willey; Jessica E Goetz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  An extended discrete element method for the estimation of contact pressure at the ankle joint during stance phase.

Authors:  Ivan Benemerito; Luca Modenese; Erica Montefiori; Claudia Mazzà; Marco Viceconti; Damien Lacroix; Lingzhong Guo
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 1.617

6.  Numerical Modeling of Shockwave Treatment of Knee Joint.

Authors:  Galina Eremina; Alexey Smolin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.