Literature DB >> 29221512

Social class and prosocial behavior: current evidence, caveats, and questions.

Paul K Piff1, Angela R Robinson2.   

Abstract

This review synthesizes research on social class and prosocial behavior. Individuals of lower social class display increased attention to others and greater sensitivity to others' welfare compared to individuals of higher social class, who exhibit more self-oriented patterns of social cognition. As a result, lower-class individuals are more likely to engage in other-beneficial prosocial behavior, whereas higher-class individuals are more prone to engage in self-beneficial behavior. Although the extant evidence indicates that higher social class standing may tend to undermine prosocial impulses, we propose that the effects of social class on prosocial behavior may also depend on three crucial factors: motivation, identity, and inequality. We discuss how and why these factors may moderate class differences in prosociality and offer promising lines of inquiry for future research.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29221512     DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol        ISSN: 2352-250X


  11 in total

1.  No evidence that economic inequality moderates the effect of income on generosity.

Authors:  Stefan C Schmukle; Martin Korndörfer; Boris Egloff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  In Japan, individuals of higher social class engage in other-oriented humor.

Authors:  Ryota Tsukawaki; Tomoya Imura; Makoto Hirakawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Protective factors for youth confronting economic hardship: Current challenges and future avenues in resilience research.

Authors:  Camelia E Hostinar; Gregory E Miller
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2019-09

4.  How Does Social Behavior Relate to Both Grades and Achievement Scores?

Authors:  Jeffrey M DeVries; Katharina Rathmann; Markus Gebhardt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-04

5.  Does economic inequality moderate the effect of class on prosocial behavior? A large-scale test of a recent hypothesis by Côté et al.

Authors:  Hagen von Hermanni; Andreas Tutić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Social Class Priming Effect on Prosociality: Evidence from Explicit and Implicit Measures.

Authors:  Shan Zhang; Xinlei Zang; Sainan Zhang; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Explaining civic engagement: The role of neighborhood ties, place attachment, and civic responsibility.

Authors:  Lisa Dang; Ann-Kathrin Seemann; Jörg Lindenmeier; Iris Saliterer
Journal:  J Community Psychol       Date:  2021-11-22

8.  The effect of contest participation and contest outcome on subsequent prosocial behavior.

Authors:  Adiel Moyal; Ilana Ritov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Under the Threat of an Epidemic: People with Higher Subjective Socioeconomic Status Show More Unethical Behaviors.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Xue Wang; Tonglin Jiang; Shiyao Wang; Zhansheng Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe.

Authors:  Niels J Van Doesum; Ryan O Murphy; Marcello Gallucci; Efrat Aharonov-Majar; Ursula Athenstaedt; Wing Tung Au; Liying Bai; Robert Böhm; Inna Bovina; Nancy R Buchan; Xiao-Ping Chen; Kitty B Dumont; Jan B Engelmann; Kimmo Eriksson; Hyun Euh; Susann Fiedler; Justin Friesen; Simon Gächter; Camilo Garcia; Roberto González; Sylvie Graf; Katarzyna Growiec; Serge Guimond; Martina Hřebíčková; Elizabeth Immer-Bernold; Jeff Joireman; Gokhan Karagonlar; Kerry Kawakami; Toko Kiyonari; Yu Kou; D Michael Kuhlman; Alexandros-Andreas Kyrtsis; Siugmin Lay; Geoffrey J Leonardelli; Norman P Li; Yang Li; Boris Maciejovsky; Zoi Manesi; Ali Mashuri; Aurelia Mok; Karin S Moser; Ladislav Moták; Adrian Netedu; Chandrasekhar Pammi; Michael J Platow; Karolina Raczka-Winkler; Christopher P Reinders Folmer; Cecilia Reyna; Angelo Romano; Shaul Shalvi; Cláudia Simão; Adam W Stivers; Pontus Strimling; Yannis Tsirbas; Sonja Utz; Leander van der Meij; Sven Waldzus; Yiwen Wang; Bernd Weber; Ori Weisel; Tim Wildschut; Fabian Winter; Junhui Wu; Jose C Yong; Paul A M Van Lange
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.