| Literature DB >> 29221170 |
Aurélien Voissiere1, Valérie Weber1, Yvain Gerard1, Françoise Rédini2, Florian Raes3, Jean-Michel Chezal1, Françoise Degoul1, Caroline Peyrode1, Elisabeth Miot-Noirault1.
Abstract
Due to its abundant chondrogenic matrix and hypoxic tissue, chondrosarcoma is chemo- and radio-resistant. Our group has developed a proteoglycan targeting strategy by using a quaternary ammonium (QA) function as a carrier of DNA alkylating agents to chondrosarcoma environment. Here, we assessed the relevance of this strategy applied to hypoxia-activated prodrugs, by conjugating a QA to 2-nitroimidazole phosphoramidate. This derivative, named as 8-QA, was evaluated respectively to its non-QA equivalent and to a QA-conjugated but non-hypoxia activated. Firstly binding to aggrecan was confirmed from dissociation constant determined by Surface Plasmon Resonance. In vitro, in HEMC-SS chondrosarcoma cells cultured in monolayer and in spheroids, 8-QA showed higher cytotoxic activity in hypoxia versus normoxia, and led to a strong accumulation of cells in S phase and apoptosis. In vivo, a HEMC-SS xenograft model was implanted on SCID mice and characterized for hypoxia by photoacoustic imaging as well as proteoglycan content. When HEMC-SS bearing mice were given 8-QA at 47 μmol/kg according to a q4d x 6 schedule, a significant 62.1% inhibition of tumor growth was observed, without associated hematological side effects. Mechanistic studies of treated tumors highlighted decrease in mitotic index associated to increase in both p21 and p53S15 markers. Interestingly, 8-QA treatment induced an increase of DNA damages as measured by γH2AX predominantly found in pimonidazole-positive hypoxic areas. These preclinical results are the first to demonstrate the interest of addressing hypoxia-activated prodrugs selectively to proteoglycan of chondrogenic tumor tissue, as a promising therapeutic strategy.Entities:
Keywords: chondrosarcoma; extracellular matrix; hypoxia-activated prodrug; proteoglycan; quaternary ammonium
Year: 2017 PMID: 29221170 PMCID: PMC5707064 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21337
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1HAP synthesis and binding to immobilized aggrecan by SPR
(A) Scheme of HAP synthesis. Reagents and conditions : (a) ethylformate, K2CO3, EtOH, rt, 15-20 hours, 92%; (b) (1) ethylformate, NaH, 0 °C, rt, 15-20 hours, (2) HCl 37%, EtOH, 110 °C, 1 hour, (3) NH2CN, AcONa/AcOH, 95°C, 1 hour, 55%; (c) NaNO2, AcOH, rt, 15-20 hours, 75%; (d) NaOH, rt, 12 hours, 77%; (e) (1) isobutylchloroformate, TEA, THF anh., -20°C, 2 hours, (2) NaBH4, H2O, -20 to -10°C, 1.5 hours, 75%; (f) NaBH4, LiBr, THF/MeOH/H2O, 0°C, rt, 7 hours, 70%; (g) (1) bis(2-chloroethyl)phosphoramidic dichloride, Li(TMS)2N, THF anh., -78°C, 1 hour, (2) N,N-dimethylamino-1-propylamine, THF anh., -78°C, 1 hour, 48%; (h) (1) bis(2-chloroethyl)phosphoramidic dichloride, Li(TMS)2N, THF anh., -78°C, 1.7 hours, (2) n-propylamine, THF anh., -78°C, 20 minutes, 65%; (i) MeI, THF anh., 3.5 hours, 99%; (j) (1) NaH, bis(2-chloroethyl)phosphoramidic dichloride, toluene anh., 0°C, 15-20 hours, (2) N,N-dimethylamino-1-propylamine, 0°C, 2 hours, 88%; (k) MeI, THF anh., 3.5 hours, 78%. (B-E) SPR assays: Representative sensorgrams of 8-QA (B), 8 (C) and 10-QA (D) binding to aggrecan. All derivatives were injected at 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625 mM (from top to bottom) during 600 seconds on immobilized aggrecan at a flow rate of 30 μL/min. E. Dissociation constants (KD) were determined for each derivative by “steady-state affinity analysis”. All experiments were carried out in triplicate. NC: Non-calculable
Figure 2Characterization of HEMC-SS spheroids in terms of growth, hypoxia and proteoglycans
(A) Optical visualization of HEMC-SS spheroids at different stages of growth (Day 1, 7, 10 and 14). (B) SEM visualization of HEMC-SS spheroid at Day 10. (C) Growth–time curve of spheroids. Cell number was determined after spheroid trypsinization. (D) SOX-9 expression determined by qRT-PCR on HEMC-SS monolayer cell culture and on spheroids at Day 7, Day 10 and and Day 14. Data are represented as mean ± SD. (E) Ki-67 immunostaining on Day 10 spheroid section. Proliferative cells were mainly localized at the periphery of the spheroid. (F) Representative images of hypoxia on Day 10 spheroid using a LOX-1 probe for which fluorescent signal is only activated by hypoxic conditions. The LOX-1 hypoxia probe was added to spheroid culture medium at a final concentration of 200 μM, 24 hours before fluorescence detection. (G) Representative image of pimonidazole immunostaining of hypoxia on Day 10 spheroid section. Pimonidazole was added to spheroid at a final concentration of 200 μM one hour before fixation and paraffin-embedding. (H) Alcian blue staining on Day 10 HEMC-SS spheroid sections to evidence proteoglycans.
Cytotoxicity of HAP derivatives on HEMC-SS culture models in normoxic (21% O2) and hypoxic (N2, O2 < 0.3%) conditions
| IC50 (μM) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monolayer | Spheroids | S/M | ||||||
| Normoxia | Hypoxia | HCR | Normoxia | Hypoxia | HCR | Normoxia | Hypoxia | |
| 29.3 ± 8.0 | 4.3 ± 1.2* | 101.1 ± 32.6 | 31.8 ± 5.5* | |||||
| 32.5 ± 4.3 | 4.3 ± 1.2* | 99.4 ± 5.2 | 5.7 ± 1.2* | |||||
| > 200 | > 200 | > 200 | > 200 | |||||
Cultures were exposed to drugs for 24 hours followed by incubation for 48 hours in normoxia.
Notes: Data are represented as mean ± SD. *significant difference versus normoxic condition.
Abbreviations: IC50: Inhibiting concentration 50; HCR: Hypoxic–cytotoxic ratio; S/M: spheroid/monolayer cytotoxic ratio; NC: Not calculable
Figure 3Cell cycle and apoptosis analyses on HEMC-SS cells treated by 8-QA
Cell cycle distribution (A) and Annexin V test (B) on HEMC-SS cells treated in normoxic (21% O2) or hypoxic (N2, O2 < 0.3%) conditions by derivative 8-QA at 25 μM, 50 μM and 100 μM for 24 hours. (A) In normoxia, 8-QA treatment led to an increase in S-phase associated with a decrease in G2/M phase. In hypoxia, 8-QA treatment led to a high accumulation of cells in S-phase associated with an increase in SubG0/G1 phase. Data are represented as mean ± SD. 8-QA treatments and controls were compared using two-way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey's post-hoc multiple comparisons test. (B) Increase of Annexin V positive cells was observed after 8-QA treatment in hypoxia from 50 μM. Data are represented as mean ± SD. Treatments in normoxic and hypoxic conditions were compared using a two-way ANOVA analysis followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc comparisons test.
Figure 4Evaluation and characterization of hypoxia and proteoglycan-rich ECM of HEMC-SS bearing mice
(A) Representative Doppler imaging for vascularization assessment. Arrows show large vessels mainly localized at the periphery of the tumor (T) delineated by circle. (B) Ultrasound (left) and photoacoustic (right) imaging of tumor. On photoacoustic imaging, red color represents high oxygenated areas (max) while blue/black colors represent low oxygenated areas (min). Pink circles delineate the tumor. A global tumor hypoxia fraction of 67 ± 4 % (for a tumor volume of 333 ± 41 mm3) was determined using the OxyHemo-Mode. Experiment was performed on 4 independent mice. (C) Ultrasound (left) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) (right) imaging before (top) or after (bottom) i.v. injection of μ-bubbles to determine tumor perfusion status. After μ-bubbles injections, higher contrasted pixels (arrow) were observed in the tumor confirming the presence of microvascularization. (D) Alcian Blue staining of tumor sections to evidence proteoglycan in ECM.
Figure 5Evaluation of HAP antitumor efficacies on the HEMC-SS xenograft model
(A) Evaluation of tumor volume after 6 i.v. injections at 4-day intervals of 8-QA (47.0 μmol/kg) and 8 (47.0 μmol/kg). (B) Evaluation of tumor volume after 6 i.v. injections at 4-day intervals of derivative 10-QA (46.7 μmol/kg). For control groups, vehicle was injected. Data are represented as mean ± SD. *significant difference versus control group; # significant difference versus 8-treated group. (C) Weight of tumors sampled one day after the last dose and normalized to control group of each study. Data are represented as mean ± SD.
Figure 6Characterization of in vivo antitumor efficacy
(A) Quantification of mitosis number (left) per 10 fields after H&E staining of paraffin-embedded treated tumor sections (n≥3 tumors per group of treatment). Data are represented as mean ± SD. Representative images of H&E staining (right). Arrows show mitosis. (B) Western blot analyses of the cell cycle inhibitor p21 and p53s15 on tumors sampled one day after last injection. Individual bands (S1, S2, S3) correspond to 3 independent tumor samples per group of treatment.
Figure 7Distribution of DNA damages in treated tumor tissue
Representative images of immunostaining of hypoxia marker pimonidazole (brown staining) and DNA damage (γH2AX) marker on two consecutive tumor sections. Pimonidazole was i.p.-injected at 60 mg/kg 1 hour before mice were euthanized.
Figure 8Side-effect evaluations
(A) Weight variation from Day 20 post-inoculation for 8 and 8-QA-treated mice (on the left) and for 10-QA treated mice (on the right). Data are represented as mean ± SD. (B) White Blood Cell (WBC) count (n≥4 per group of treatment) normalized to the control groups the day after last dose. Blood was sampled by retro-orbital puncture. Data are represented as mean ± SD. (C) Anatomopathological analysis of healthy cartilage from mouse knee joints sampled 24 hours after the last dose (n = 5 per group of treatment). Articular cartilages were stained by Toluidine blue and Masson trichrome to evidence proteoglycans and collagen respectively. Scale bar = 100 μm.