| Literature DB >> 29221141 |
Jody Vykoukal1,2, Nan Sun1, Clemente Aguilar-Bonavides3, Hiroyuki Katayama1, Ichidai Tanaka4, Johannes F Fahrmann1, Michela Capello1, Junya Fujimoto4, Mitzi Aguilar1, Ignacio I Wistuba4, Ayumu Taguchi4, Edwin J Ostrin5, Samir M Hanash1,4,2.
Abstract
Exosomes and other extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been implicated as mediators of intercellular communication. Their release into the circulation has the potential to inform about tumor status. In-depth proteomic characterization of plasma-derived EVs has been limited by challenges in isolating EVs from protein-abundant biological fluids. We implemented a novel single-step density gradient flotation workflow for efficient and rapid isolation of highly enriched circulating EVs from plasma. Mass-spectrometry analysis of plasma EVs from subjects with lung adenocarcinoma and matched controls resulted in the identification of 640 proteins. A total of 108 proteins exhibited significant (p<0.05) differential expression in vesicle preparations derived from lung adenocarcinoma case plasmas compared to controls, of which 43 were also identified in EVs from lung adenocarcinoma cell lines. Four top performing EV-associated proteins that distinguished adenocarcinoma cases from controls, SRGN, TPM3, THBS1 and HUWE1, yielded a combined area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% CI = 0.76-1). Our findings support the potential of EV derived proteins as a source of biomarkers that complement other approaches for tumor assessment.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker discovery; extracellular vesicles and exosomes; liquid biopsy; lung cancer; proteomics
Year: 2017 PMID: 29221141 PMCID: PMC5707035 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Isolation of extracellular vesicles from plasma
(A) Gradient flotation principle. Plasma samples are density-adjusted and overlaid with lower-density fractionation media to form single- or multi-step gradients; circulating extracellular vesicles are separated according to density by ultracentrifugation. Non-vesicle-associated proteins exhibit negative buoyancy and sediment downward; vesicle complexes float upward to neutral (or minimal) density and are collected from the upper zones of the overlay. (B) Transmission electron microscopy images of plasma-derived EVs obtained from multi-step density fractionation of plasma (scale bar, 100 nm). Images are arrayed in order of increasing fraction density; vesicle-depleted plasma is shown in lower-right image (FB). Fraction numbers correspond with those specified in Figure 1. (C) Relative distribution of exosome-sized particles (upper graph) and protein abundance (lower graph) in vesicle populations obtained from multi-step density fractionation of plasma. Fractions of equal volume were collected from the top of the tube proceeding downward for quantification by nanoparticle-tracking and protein assay. Fraction numbers correspond to relative position specified in A and shown in B. (D) Ponceau S staining for total protein content of density fractionated vesicle harvests, indicating relative protein abundance in upper fractions (F1-F8) and vesicle-depleted plasma (FB). Immunoblot staining of fractionated EVs from three different plasma samples for (E) endosomal sorting marker TSG101 and (F) cell surface glycoprotein marker CD9, showing relative expression of these markers according to EV buoyant density as well as in vesicle-depleted plasma (lane 9). (G) Nanoparticle-tracking analysis of EV preparations from adenocarcinoma case and matched control plasmas, indicating size distribution of isolated particles. Size and yield data are summarized (upper). Cohort samples were prepared by ultracentrifugation flotation through a single-step density-overlay (ρ = 1.14 g/mL).
Clinicopathological features of lung adenocarcinoma patient and matched control discovery cohort
| A. Summary | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Cases | Controls | |||||||
| 28 | 13 | 15 | |||||||
| | 10 | (35.7) | 5 | (38.5) | 5 | (33.3) | |||
| | 18 | (64.3) | 8 | (61.5) | 10 | (66.7) | |||
| 63.7 | ± | 7.6 | 63.5 | ± | 8.3 | 63.9 | ± | 7.1 | |
| | 3 | (10.7) | 3 | (23.1) | 0 | (0.0) | |||
| | 13 | (46.4) | 8 | (61.5) | 5 | (33.3) | |||
| | 12 | (42.9) | 2 | (15.4) | 10 | (66.7) | |||
| | 6 | (46.2) | |||||||
| | 7 | (53.8) | |||||||
Figure 2Hierarchical clustering analyses of plasma-derived EV proteins
Pearson's correlation coefficient and Ward's method were used. Lung adenocarcinoma cases are in black; disease free controls are in cyan. (A) Intensity heat map of all proteins identified by LC MS/MS proteomics. (B) Bimodal distribution of log2 relative intensities for identified proteins reveals high and low abundance protein groups. (C) Integration and filtering scheme for plasma- and cell line-derived EV datasets. (D) Intensity heat map of high abundance protein group. (E) Intensity heat map of low abundance protein group; a cancer-related cluster is highlighted.
GO enrichment analysis, cellular component and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis, diseases and functions for low and high abundance proteins conveyed by plasma-derived extracellular vesicles from lung adenocarcinoma cases and disease-free controls
| A. GO enrichment analysis, cellular component: low abundance (560) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathway ID | Pathway description | Observed gene count | False discovery rate |
| GO.0070062 | extracellular exosome | 185 | 3.16E-34 |
| GO.0044421 | extracellular region part | 210 | 7.91E-31 |
| GO.0031988 | membrane-bounded vesicle | 201 | 1.69E-30 |
| GO.0031982 | vesicle | 202 | 3.16E-29 |
| GO.0005576 | extracellular region | 221 | 1.97E-25 |
Figure 3STRING Protein-protein interaction analyses
(A) STRING PPI network connectivity of lung adenocarcinoma plasma-derived EV protein cluster highlighted in Figure 2E. Network contains 62 edges (vs. 11 expected edges); enrichment p-value< 0.001. (B) STRING PPI network connectivity for adenocarcinoma case EV-associated proteins exhibiting > 2-fold higher mean expression compared to controls. Network contains 75 nodes with 160 edges (vs. 38 expected edges); clustering coefficient: 0.742; enrichment p-value < 0.001. Confidence score threshold was set at 0.7 (high) for both analyses.
Figure 4Enrichment of tumor proteins in plasma-derived EVs and classifier performance
(A) Differential enrichment of EV proteins was evaluated for proteins with ≥ 3-fold case:control expression and p < 0.05. The average normalized spectral abundance factor (NSAF) for each protein was calculated from respective LC-MS/MS proteomic analyses of adenocarcinoma case plasma-derived EVs (●) black circle; disease free control plasma-derived EVs (○) open circle; and unfractionated plasma from paired cancer, lung disease and control specimens (◊) diamond. (B) Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses of top performing plasma EV protein markers SRGN (red), TPM3 (blue), THBS1 (violet), and HUWE1 (green). The four marker combination (yellow) yielded an AUC of 0.8995. (C) Immunoblot analysis of plasma-derived extracellular vesicles from adenocarcinoma cases and matched controls to demonstrate marker performance in immunoassay. Marker abundance as quantified by densitometry of western blot, lower left; ROC curve analysis of TPM3 performance based on western blot data, lower right.
Proteins of translational interest enriched in lung adenocarcinoma EVs
| Gene | Avg(ctrl) | Avg(case) | Fold change(case:ctrl) | AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRGN | 8.69E+03 | 4.61E+04 | 5.30 | 0.771 | 0.005 |
| TPM3 | 6.05E+02 | 2.67E+04 | 44.10 | 0.747 | 0.005 |
| THBS1 | 5.37E+03 | 2.83E+04 | 5.27 | 0.722 | 0.026 |
| HUWE1 | 1.12E+04 | 9.36E+04 | 8.36 | 0.707 | 0.027 |
| CCDC18 | 6.38E+03 | 6.24E+04 | 9.77 | 0.702 | 0.016 |
| ALDH1L1 | 0.00E+00 | 1.14E+05 | *** | 0.667 | 0.018 |
| HIST1H4A | 0.00E+00 | 6.60E+04 | *** | 0.667 | 0.018 |
| NCCRP1 | 0.00E+00 | 1.06E+04 | *** | 0.667 | 0.018 |
| MED14 | 0.00E+00 | 7.00E+03 | *** | 0.667 | 0.018 |
| BHMT | 0.00E+00 | 7.71E+04 | *** | 0.633 | 0.038 |
| GLUD1 | 0.00E+00 | 5.24E+04 | *** | 0.633 | 0.038 |
| PPIA | 0.00E+00 | 1.89E+04 | *** | 0.633 | 0.038 |
| EXOC8 | 0.00E+00 | 5.58E+03 | *** | 0.633 | 0.038 |
Filtering criteria: case:control ratio >2-fold; p < 0.05; plasma/cell-line concordance.