Literature DB >> 29220506

A Molecular Portrait of De Novo Genes in Yeasts.

Nikolaos Vakirlis1, Alex S Hebert2,3, Dana A Opulente4, Guillaume Achaz5,6, Chris Todd Hittinger3,4, Gilles Fischer1, Joshua J Coon2,3,7,8,9, Ingrid Lafontaine5,10.   

Abstract

New genes, with novel protein functions, can evolve "from scratch" out of intergenic sequences. These de novo genes can integrate the cell's genetic network and drive important phenotypic innovations. Therefore, identifying de novo genes and understanding how the transition from noncoding to coding occurs are key problems in evolutionary biology. However, identifying de novo genes is a difficult task, hampered by the presence of remote homologs, fast evolving sequences and erroneously annotated protein coding genes. To overcome these limitations, we developed a procedure that handles the usual pitfalls in de novo gene identification and predicted the emergence of 703 de novo gene candidates in 15 yeast species from 2 genera whose phylogeny spans at least 100 million years of evolution. We validated 85 candidates by proteomic data, providing new translation evidence for 25 of them through mass spectrometry experiments. We also unambiguously identified the mutations that enabled the transition from noncoding to coding for 30 Saccharomyces de novo genes. We established that de novo gene origination is a widespread phenomenon in yeasts, only a few being ultimately maintained by selection. We also found that de novo genes preferentially emerge next to divergent promoters in GC-rich intergenic regions where the probability of finding a fortuitous and transcribed ORF is the highest. Finally, we found a more than 3-fold enrichment of de novo genes at recombination hot spots, which are GC-rich and nucleosome-free regions, suggesting that meiotic recombination contributes to de novo gene emergence in yeasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29220506      PMCID: PMC5850487          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msx315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  102 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A phylostratigraphy approach to uncover the genomic history of major adaptations in metazoan lineages.

Authors:  Tomislav Domazet-Loso; Josip Brajković; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Recent de novo origin of human protein-coding genes.

Authors:  David G Knowles; Aoife McLysaght
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Rose: generating sequence families.

Authors:  J Stoye; D Evers; F Meyer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Phylostratigraphic bias creates spurious patterns of genome evolution.

Authors:  Bryan A Moyers; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 6.  Evolution of new functions de novo and from preexisting genes.

Authors:  Dan I Andersson; Jon Jerlström-Hultqvist; Joakim Näsvall
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  Novel genes derived from noncoding DNA in Drosophila melanogaster are frequently X-linked and exhibit testis-biased expression.

Authors:  Mia T Levine; Corbin D Jones; Andrew D Kern; Heather A Lindfors; David J Begun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A de novo originated gene depresses budding yeast mating pathway and is repressed by the protein encoded by its antisense strand.

Authors:  Dan Li; Yang Dong; Yu Jiang; Huifeng Jiang; Jing Cai; Wen Wang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 25.617

9.  No Evidence for Phylostratigraphic Bias Impacting Inferences on Patterns of Gene Emergence and Evolution.

Authors:  Tomislav Domazet-Lošo; Anne-Ruxandra Carvunis; M Mar Albà; Martin Sebastijan Šestak; Robert Bakaric; Rafik Neme; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Challenges in homology search: HMMER3 and convergent evolution of coiled-coil regions.

Authors:  Jaina Mistry; Robert D Finn; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman; Marco Punta
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  28 in total

1.  Multiple Pristionchus pacificus genomes reveal distinct evolutionary dynamics between de novo candidates and duplicated genes.

Authors:  Neel Prabh; Christian Rödelsperger
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 9.438

2.  Mixing genome annotation methods in a comparative analysis inflates the apparent number of lineage-specific genes.

Authors:  Caroline M Weisman; Andrew W Murray; Sean R Eddy
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 10.900

3.  Heterologous expression of naturally evolved putative de novo proteins with chaperones.

Authors:  Lars A Eicholt; Margaux Aubel; Katrin Berk; Erich Bornberg-Bauer; Andreas Lange
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 6.993

4.  Random peptides rich in small and disorder-promoting amino acids are less likely to be harmful.

Authors:  Luke Kosinski; Nathan Aviles; Kevin Gomez; Joanna Masel
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.065

5.  Pervasive translation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Carol Smith; Jill G Canestrari; Archer J Wang; Matthew M Champion; Keith M Derbyshire; Todd A Gray; Joseph T Wade
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Universal and taxon-specific trends in protein sequences as a function of age.

Authors:  Jennifer E James; Sara M Willis; Paul G Nelson; Catherine Weibel; Luke J Kosinski; Joanna Masel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  A vast pool of lineage-specific microproteins encoded by long non-coding RNAs in plants.

Authors:  Igor Fesenko; Svetlana A Shabalina; Anna Mamaeva; Andrey Knyazev; Anna Glushkevich; Irina Lyapina; Rustam Ziganshin; Sergey Kovalchuk; Daria Kharlampieva; Vassili Lazarev; Michael Taliansky; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A putative de novo evolved gene required for spermatid chromatin condensation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Emily L Rivard; Andrew G Ludwig; Prajal H Patel; Anna Grandchamp; Sarah E Arnold; Alina Berger; Emilie M Scott; Brendan J Kelly; Grace C Mascha; Erich Bornberg-Bauer; Geoffrey D Findlay
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Tracing the De Novo Origin of Protein-Coding Genes in Yeast.

Authors:  Baojun Wu; Alicia Knudson
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  From De Novo to "De Nono": The Majority of Novel Protein-Coding Genes Identified with Phylostratigraphy Are Old Genes or Recent Duplicates.

Authors:  Claudio Casola
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.