Linda Sharp1, Eamonn O'Leary2, Alan O'Ceilleachair2, Mairead Skally3, Paul Hanly4. 1. Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. 2. National Cancer Registry Ireland, Cork, Ireland. 3. Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. 4. National College Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The financial impact and consequences of cancer on the lives of survivors remain poorly understood. This is especially true for colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: We investigated objective cancer-related financial stress, subjective cancer-related financial strain, and their association with health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional postal survey. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in Ireland, which has a mixed public-private healthcare system. PATIENTS: Colorectal cancer survivors, diagnosed 6 to 37 months prior, were identified from the population-based National Cancer Registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cancer-related financial stress was assessed as impact of cancer on household ability to make ends meet and cancer-related financial strain by feelings about household financial situation since cancer diagnosis. Health-related quality of life was based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 global health status. Logistic regression was used to identify associations between financial stress and strain and low health-related quality of life (lowest quartile, score ≤50). RESULTS: A total of 493 survivors participated. Overall, 41% reported cancer-related financial stress and 39% cancer-related financial strain; 32% reported both financial stress and financial strain. After adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical variables, the odds of low health-related quality of life were significantly higher in those who reported cancer-related financial stress postdiagnosis compared with those who reported no change in financial stress postcancer (OR = 2.54 (95% CI, 1.62-3.99)). The odds of low health-related quality of life were also significantly higher in those with worse financial strain postdiagnosis (OR =1.73 (95% CI, 1.09-2.72)). The OR for those with both cancer-related financial stress and financial strain was 2.59 (95% CI, 1.59-4.22). LIMITATIONS: Survey responders were younger, on average, than nonresponders. Responders and nonresponders may have differed in cancer-related financial stress and strain or health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Four in 10 colorectal cancer survivors reported an adverse financial impact of cancer. Cancer-related financial stress and strain were significantly associated with low health-related quality of life. To inform support strategies, additional research is needed to better understand how both objective and subjective financial distress influence survivors' health-related quality of life. See Video Abstract http://links.lww.com/DCR/A447.
BACKGROUND: The financial impact and consequences of cancer on the lives of survivors remain poorly understood. This is especially true for colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: We investigated objective cancer-related financial stress, subjective cancer-related financial strain, and their association with health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional postal survey. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in Ireland, which has a mixed public-private healthcare system. PATIENTS: Colorectal cancer survivors, diagnosed 6 to 37 months prior, were identified from the population-based National Cancer Registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cancer-related financial stress was assessed as impact of cancer on household ability to make ends meet and cancer-related financial strain by feelings about household financial situation since cancer diagnosis. Health-related quality of life was based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 global health status. Logistic regression was used to identify associations between financial stress and strain and low health-related quality of life (lowest quartile, score ≤50). RESULTS: A total of 493 survivors participated. Overall, 41% reported cancer-related financial stress and 39% cancer-related financial strain; 32% reported both financial stress and financial strain. After adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical variables, the odds of low health-related quality of life were significantly higher in those who reported cancer-related financial stress postdiagnosis compared with those who reported no change in financial stress postcancer (OR = 2.54 (95% CI, 1.62-3.99)). The odds of low health-related quality of life were also significantly higher in those with worse financial strain postdiagnosis (OR =1.73 (95% CI, 1.09-2.72)). The OR for those with both cancer-related financial stress and financial strain was 2.59 (95% CI, 1.59-4.22). LIMITATIONS: Survey responders were younger, on average, than nonresponders. Responders and nonresponders may have differed in cancer-related financial stress and strain or health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Four in 10 colorectal cancer survivors reported an adverse financial impact of cancer. Cancer-related financial stress and strain were significantly associated with low health-related quality of life. To inform support strategies, additional research is needed to better understand how both objective and subjective financial distress influence survivors' health-related quality of life. See Video Abstract http://links.lww.com/DCR/A447.
Authors: Theresa A Hastert; Jaclyn M Kyko; Amanda R Reed; Felicity W K Harper; Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Tara E Baird; Ann G Schwartz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Matthew P Banegas; Jennifer L Schneider; Alison J Firemark; John F Dickerson; Erin E Kent; Janet S de Moor; Katherine S Virgo; Gery P Guy; Donatus U Ekwueme; Zhiyuan Zheng; Alexandra M Varga; Lisa A Waiwaiole; Stephanie M Nutt; Aditi Narayan; K Robin Yabroff Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Ibrahim M Gosadi; Raum A Ayoub; Hakemah T Albrahim; Manar S Alhakami; Eilaf H Ageely; Rawiyah S Alwadani; Halah M Shayani; Salma A Shteafi Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2022-08-05 Impact factor: 2.314
Authors: Mayra Cruz-Fernández; Alexander Achalandabaso-Ochoa; Tania Gallart-Aragón; Francisco Artacho-Cordón; María José Cabrerizo-Fernández; Nicolás Pacce-Bedetti; Irene Cantarero-Villanueva Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Christopher J Longo; Margaret I Fitch; Laura Banfield; Paul Hanly; K Robin Yabroff; Linda Sharp Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-07-11 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Shervin Assari; James Smith; Ritesh Mistry; Mehdi Farokhnia; Mohsen Bazargan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mohsen Bazargan; James L Smith; Paul Robinson; John Uyanne; Ruqayyah Abdulrahoof; Chika Chuku; Shervin Assari Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 3.390