Literature DB >> 29219780

Anatomical and technical factors associated with superior facet joint violation in lumbar fusion.

Alisson R Teles1,2, Michael Paci3, Gabriel Gutman1,2, Fahad H Abduljabbar1,4,5, Jean A Ouellet1,4, Michael H Weber1,4, Jeff D Golan1,3,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomical and surgical risk factors for screw-related facet joint violation at the superior level in lumbar fusion. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of a consecutive series of posterior lumbar instrumented fusions performed by a single surgeon. Inclusion criteria were primary lumbar fusion of 1 or 2 levels for degenerative disorders. The following variables were analyzed as possible risk factors: surgical technique (percutaneous vs open screw placement), depth of surgical field, degree of anterior slippage of the superior level, pedicle and facet angle, and facet degeneration of the superior level. Postoperative CT scans were evaluated by 2 independent reviewers. Axial, sagittal, and coronal views were reviewed. Pedicle screws were graded as intra-articular if they clearly interposed between the superior and inferior facet joints of the superior level. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the factors associated with this complication. RESULTS One hundred thirty-one patients were included. Interobserver reliability for facet joint violation assessment was high (κ = 0.789). The incidence of superior facet joint violation was 12.59% per top-level screw (33 of 262 proximal screws). The rate of facet violation was 28.0% in the percutaneous technique group (14 of 50 patients) and 12.3% in the open surgery group (10 of 81 patients) (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.09-4.21; p = 0.024). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of facet violation were percutaneous screw placement (adjusted OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.42-7.73; p = 0.006), right-side pedicle screw (adjusted OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.29-7.63; p = 0.011), and facet angle > 45° (adjusted OR 10.95, 95% CI 4.64-25.84; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of facet joint violation was higher in percutaneous minimally invasive than in open technique for posterior lumbar spine surgery. Also, coronal orientation of the facet joint is a significant risk factor independent of the surgical technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AP = anteroposterior; ASD = adjacent-segment disease; DFP = difference between facet and pedicle (angle); MIS = minimally invasive surgery; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; facet joint; lumbar spine; minimally invasive surgery; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29219780     DOI: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE17130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  9 in total

1.  Facet Violation With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: Impact of 3D Navigation and Facet Orientation.

Authors:  Ting Cong; Ahilan Sivaganesan; Christopher M Mikhail; Avani S Vaishnav; James Dowdell; Joseph Barbera; Hiroshi Kumagai; Jonathan Markowitz; Evan Sheha; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-07-03

2.  Comparative Radiographic Analyses and Clinical Outcomes Between O-Arm Navigated and Fluoroscopic-Guided Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Weerasak Singhatanadgige; Phattareeya Pholprajug; Kittisak Songthong; Wicharn Yingsakmongkol; Chanonta Triganjananun; Vit Kotheeranurak; Worawat Limthongkul
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-02-17

3.  Comparison of robot-assisted and freehand pedicle screw placement for lumbar revision surgery.

Authors:  Jia-Nan Zhang; Yong Fan; Xin He; Tuan-Jiang Liu; Ding-Jun Hao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Short-term effectiveness comparison between robotic-guided percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw internal fixation and traditional open internal fixation in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures].

Authors:  Shu Lin; Jiang Hu; Lun Wan; Liuyi Tang; Yue Wang; Yang Yu; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-01-15

5.  Multivariate analysis of pedicle screw invasion of the proximal facet joint after lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Peng Tao Wang; Jia Nan Zhang; Tuan Jiang Liu; Jun Song Yang; Ding Jun Hao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Rates and risk factors of intrapedicular accuracy and cranial facet joint violation among robot-assisted, fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous, and freehand techniques in pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar fractures: a comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Ren-Jie Zhang; Lu-Ping Zhou; Hua-Qing Zhang; Peng Ge; Chong-Yu Jia; Cai-Liang Shen
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Safety and risk factors of TINAVI robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Ren-Jie Zhang; Lu-Ping Zhou; Lai Zhang; Hua-Qing Zhang; Jian-Xiang Zhang; Cai-Liang Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.677

8.  Predictors of accurate intrapedicular screw placement in single-level lumbar (L4-5) fusion: robot-assisted pedicle screw, traditional pedicle screw, and cortical bone trajectory screw insertion.

Authors:  Hua-Qing Zhang; Can-Can Wang; Ren-Jie Zhang; Lu-Ping Zhou; Chong-Yu Jia; Peng Ge; Cai-Liang Shen
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 2.030

9.  Rate and Risk Factors of Superior Facet Joint Violation during Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Placement: A Comparison of Robot-Assisted Approach with a Conventional Technique.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Le; Zhan Shi; Qi-Long Wang; Yun-Feng Xu; Jing-Wei Zhao; Wei Tian
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.071

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.