Literature DB >> 29219747

Using magnetic materials to harvest microalgal biomass: evaluation of harvesting and detachment efficiency.

L-D Zhu1,2, Erkki Hiltunen2, Zhaohua Li3.   

Abstract

Using naked iron oxide (Fe3O4) and yttrium iron oxide (Y3Fe5O12) nanoparticles as flocculants, the harvesting efficiency of Chlorella vulgaris biomass was investigated. The harvesting process includes two steps, which are the separation of microalgae from the culture solution with the magnetic nanoparticles and then the separation of the algae from the magnetic nanoparticles. The optimal dosages and pH values for the magnetic harvesting of microalgal biomass were determined. Results showed that Y3Fe5O12 nanoparticles were more efficient in microalgal biomass harvesting than Fe3O4 nanoparticles. In an effort to achieve more than 90% of harvesting efficiency, optimal dosages for Fe3O4 and Y3Fe5O12 to harvest microalgal biomass were 10 and 2.5 g/L, while the appropriate pH values were 6.2 and 7.3, respectively. The harvesting efficiency of Fe3O4 and Y3Fe5O12 nanoparticles increased as the pH value decreased. The experimental results also showed that under a higher pH value Fe3O4 nanoparticles were much easier to be separated from the flocs than Y3Fe5O12. 62.9% of Fe3O4 nanoparticles could be de-attached from the aggregates, when the floc pH value reached 12.3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microalgae; biomass production; magnetic materials; magnetophoretic harvesting

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29219747     DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1415379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Technol        ISSN: 0959-3330            Impact factor:   3.247


  6 in total

1.  Single-step dynamic dewatering of microalgae from dilute suspensions using flocculant assisted filtration.

Authors:  Mutah Musa; Andrew Ward; Godwin A Ayoko; Christine Rösch; Richard Brown; Thomas J Rainey
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.328

2.  Fe3O4-PEI Nanocomposites for Magnetic Harvesting of Chlorella vulgaris, Chlorella ellipsoidea, Microcystis aeruginosa, and Auxenochlorella protothecoides.

Authors:  Kristína Gerulová; Alexandra Kucmanová; Zuzana Sanny; Zuzana Garaiová; Eugen Seiler; Mária Čaplovičová; Ľubomír Čaplovič; Marián Palcut
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 5.719

3.  Microalgae Chlorella vulgaris biomass harvesting by natural flocculant: effects on biomass sedimentation, spent medium recycling and lipid extraction.

Authors:  Liandong Zhu; Zhaohua Li; Erkki Hiltunen
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 4.  Factors Affecting Microalgae Production for Biofuels and the Potentials of Chemometric Methods in Assessing and Optimizing Productivity.

Authors:  Mutah Musa; Godwin A Ayoko; Andrew Ward; Christine Rösch; Richard J Brown; Thomas J Rainey
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Optimization of Microalga Chlorella vulgaris Magnetic Harvesting.

Authors:  Maria G Savvidou; Maria Myrto Dardavila; Ioulia Georgiopoulou; Vasiliki Louli; Haralambos Stamatis; Dimitris Kekos; Epaminondas Voutsas
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 5.076

6.  Bare Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Magnetic Harvesting of Microalgae: From Interaction Behavior to Process Realization.

Authors:  Paula Fraga-García; Peter Kubbutat; Markus Brammen; Sebastian Schwaminger; Sonja Berensmeier
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.076

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.