Literature DB >> 29219034

Measuring Relative Coupling Strength in Circadian Systems.

Christoph Schmal1, Erik D Herzog2, Hanspeter Herzel3.   

Abstract

Modern imaging techniques allow the monitoring of circadian rhythms of single cells. Coupling between these single cellular circadian oscillators can generate coherent periodic signals on the tissue level that subsequently orchestrate physiological outputs. The strength of coupling in such systems of oscillators is often unclear. In particular, effects on coupling strength by varying cell densities, by knockouts, and by inhibitor applications are debated. In this study, we suggest to quantify the relative coupling strength via analyzing period, phase, and amplitude distributions in ensembles of individual circadian oscillators. Simulations of different oscillator networks show that period and phase distributions become narrower with increasing coupling strength. Moreover, amplitudes can increase due to resonance effects. Variances of periods and phases decay monotonically with coupling strength, and can serve therefore as measures of relative coupling strength. Our theoretical predictions are confirmed by studying recently published experimental data from PERIOD2 expression in slices of the suprachiasmatic nucleus during and after the application of tetrodotoxin (TTX). On analyzing the corresponding period, phase, and amplitude distributions, we can show that treatment with TTX can be associated with a reduced coupling strength in the system of coupled oscillators. Analysis of an oscillator network derived directly from the data confirms our conclusions. We suggest that our approach is also applicable to quantify coupling in fibroblast cultures and hepatocyte networks, and for social synchronization of circadian rhythmicity in rodents, flies, and bees.

Entities:  

Keywords:  circadian clock; coupling; oscillator; suprachiasmatic nucleus; synchronization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29219034      PMCID: PMC6344889          DOI: 10.1177/0748730417740467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Rhythms        ISSN: 0748-7304            Impact factor:   3.182


  54 in total

1.  Antiphase oscillation of the left and right suprachiasmatic nuclei.

Authors:  H O de la Iglesia; J Meyer; A Carpino; W J Schwartz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Functional independence of circadian clocks that regulate plant gene expression.

Authors:  S C Thain; A Hall; A J Millar
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-08-24       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Synchronization of cellular clocks in the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Authors:  Shun Yamaguchi; Hiromi Isejima; Takuya Matsuo; Ryusuke Okura; Kazuhiro Yagita; Masaki Kobayashi; Hitoshi Okamura
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Circadian gene expression in individual fibroblasts: cell-autonomous and self-sustained oscillators pass time to daughter cells.

Authors:  Emi Nagoshi; Camille Saini; Christoph Bauer; Thierry Laroche; Felix Naef; Ueli Schibler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Spontaneous synchronization of coupled circadian oscillators.

Authors:  Didier Gonze; Samuel Bernard; Christian Waltermann; Achim Kramer; Hanspeter Herzel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Resetting the circadian clock by social experience in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Joel D Levine; Pablo Funes; Harold B Dowse; Jeffrey C Hall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Intrinsic period and light intensity determine the phase relationship between melatonin and sleep in humans.

Authors:  Kenneth P Wright; Claude Gronfier; Jeanne F Duffy; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.182

8.  Temporal precision in the mammalian circadian system: a reliable clock from less reliable neurons.

Authors:  Erik D Herzog; Sara J Aton; Rika Numano; Yoshiyuki Sakaki; Hajime Tei
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.182

9.  Life between clocks: daily temporal patterns of human chronotypes.

Authors:  Till Roenneberg; Anna Wirz-Justice; Martha Merrow
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.182

10.  Diversity in the circadian periods of single neurons of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus depends on nuclear structure and intrinsic period.

Authors:  Sato Honma; Wataru Nakamura; Tetsuo Shirakawa; Ken-ichi Honma
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Communicating clocks shape circadian homeostasis.

Authors:  Kevin B Koronowski; Paolo Sassone-Corsi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Mathematical Modeling in Circadian Rhythmicity.

Authors:  Marta Del Olmo; Saskia Grabe; Hanspeter Herzel
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Deciphering clock cell network morphology within the biological master clock, suprachiasmatic nucleus: From the perspective of circadian wave dynamics.

Authors:  Hyun Kim; Cheolhong Min; Byeongha Jeong; Kyoung J Lee
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.779

4.  Cell-cell coupling and DNA methylation abnormal phenotypes in the after-hours mice.

Authors:  Federico Tinarelli; Elena Ivanova; Ilaria Colombi; Erica Barini; Edoardo Balzani; Celina Garcia Garcia; Laura Gasparini; Michela Chiappalone; Gavin Kelsey; Valter Tucci
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.954

5.  Inferring dynamic topology for decoding spatiotemporal structures in complex heterogeneous networks.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Erik D Herzog; István Z Kiss; William J Schwartz; Guy Bloch; Michael Sebek; Daniel Granados-Fuentes; Liang Wang; Jr-Shin Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Coordinated circadian timing through the integration of local inputs in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Mark Greenwood; Mirela Domijan; Peter D Gould; Anthony J W Hall; James C W Locke
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Weak coupling between intracellular feedback loops explains dissociation of clock gene dynamics.

Authors:  Christoph Schmal; Daisuke Ono; Jihwan Myung; J Patrick Pett; Sato Honma; Ken-Ichi Honma; Hanspeter Herzel; Isao T Tokuda
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 8.  Peripheral clocks tick independently of their master.

Authors:  Anna-Marie Finger; Achim Kramer
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 9.  The Effects of Light and the Circadian System on Rhythmic Brain Function.

Authors:  Charlotte von Gall
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  The choroid plexus is an important circadian clock component.

Authors:  Jihwan Myung; Christoph Schmal; Sungho Hong; Yoshiaki Tsukizawa; Pia Rose; Yong Zhang; Michael J Holtzman; Erik De Schutter; Hanspeter Herzel; Grigory Bordyugov; Toru Takumi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.