Literature DB >> 29218897

Codon bias among synonymous rare variants is associated with Alzheimer's disease imaging biomarker.

Jason E Miller1, Manu K Shivakumar, Shannon L Risacher, Andrew J Saykin, Seunggeun Lee, Kwangsik Nho, Dokyoon Kim.   

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with few biomarkers even though it impacts a relatively large portion of the population and is predicted to affect significantly more individuals in the future. Neuroimaging has been used in concert with genetic information to improve our understanding in relation to how AD arises and how it can be potentially diagnosed. Additionally, evidence suggests synonymous variants can have a functional impact on gene regulatory mechanisms, including those related to AD. Some synonymous codons are preferred over others leading to a codon bias. The bias can arise with respect to codons that are more or less frequently used in the genome. A bias can also result from optimal and non-optimal codons, which have stronger and weaker codon anti-codon interactions, respectively. Although association tests have been utilized before to identify genes associated with AD, it remains unclear how codon bias plays a role and if it can improve rare variant analysis. In this work, rare variants from whole-genome sequencing from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort were binned into genes using BioBin. An association analysis of the genes with AD-related neuroimaging biomarker was performed using SKAT-O. While using all synonymous variants we did not identify any genomewide significant associations, using only synonymous variants that affected codon frequency we identified several genes as significantly associated with the imaging phenotype. Additionally, significant associations were found using only rare variants that contains an optimal codon in among minor alleles and a non-optimal codon in the major allele. These results suggest that codon bias may play a role in AD and that it can be used to improve detection power in rare variant association analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29218897      PMCID: PMC5756629     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput        ISSN: 2335-6928


  34 in total

1.  Prolonged lesional expression of RhoA and RhoB following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sabine Conrad; Hermann J Schluesener; Katrin Trautmann; Nicolas Joannin; Richard Meyermann; Jan M Schwab
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-06-27       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 2.  Understanding the contribution of synonymous mutations to human disease.

Authors:  Zuben E Sauna; Chava Kimchi-Sarfaty
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Decoding mechanisms by which silent codon changes influence protein biogenesis and function.

Authors:  Vedrana Bali; Zsuzsanna Bebok
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 5.085

Review 4.  Exposing synonymous mutations.

Authors:  Ryan C Hunt; Vijaya L Simhadri; Matthew Iandoli; Zuben E Sauna; Chava Kimchi-Sarfaty
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Genetic studies of quantitative MCI and AD phenotypes in ADNI: Progress, opportunities, and plans.

Authors:  Andrew J Saykin; Li Shen; Xiaohui Yao; Sungeun Kim; Kwangsik Nho; Shannon L Risacher; Vijay K Ramanan; Tatiana M Foroud; Kelley M Faber; Nadeem Sarwar; Leanne M Munsie; Xiaolan Hu; Holly D Soares; Steven G Potkin; Paul M Thompson; John S K Kauwe; Rima Kaddurah-Daouk; Robert C Green; Arthur W Toga; Michael W Weiner
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 21.566

7.  Lesional expression of RhoA and RhoB following traumatic brain injury in humans.

Authors:  Christine Brabeck; Rudi Beschorner; Sabine Conrad; Michel Mittelbronn; Kubrom Bekure; Richard Meyermann; Hermann J Schluesener; Jan M Schwab
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Using BioBin to explore rare variant population stratification.

Authors:  Carrie B Moore; John R Wallace; Alex T Frase; Sarah A Pendergrass; Marylyn D Ritchie
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2013

9.  Knowledge-driven binning approach for rare variant association analysis: application to neuroimaging biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Dokyoon Kim; Anna O Basile; Lisa Bang; Emrin Horgusluoglu; Seunggeun Lee; Marylyn D Ritchie; Andrew J Saykin; Kwangsik Nho
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Genetic variants near MLST8 and DHX57 affect the epigenetic age of the cerebellum.

Authors:  Ake T Lu; Eilis Hannon; Morgan E Levine; Ke Hao; Eileen M Crimmins; Katie Lunnon; Alexey Kozlenkov; Jonathan Mill; Stella Dracheva; Steve Horvath
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  4 in total

1.  CUBAP: an interactive web portal for analyzing codon usage biases across populations.

Authors:  Matthew W Hodgman; Justin B Miller; Taylor E Meurs; John S K Kauwe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Codon usage bias analysis of genes linked with esophagus cancer.

Authors:  Hemashree Bordoloi; S R Nirmala
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2021-08-31

3.  LncRNA FLG-AS1 Mitigates Diabetic Retinopathy by Regulating Retinal Epithelial Cell Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Apoptosis via miR-380-3p/SOCS6 Axis.

Authors:  Rong Luo; Lan Li; Fan Xiao; Jinsong Fu
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Codon Usage is Influenced by Compositional Constraints in Genes Associated with Dementia.

Authors:  Taha Alqahtani; Rekha Khandia; Nidhi Puranik; Ali M Alqahtani; Kumarappan Chidambaram; Mohammad Amjad Kamal
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.772

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.