Literature DB >> 29218705

Randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of rapid and slow withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs during long-term video-EEG monitoring.

Shambhu Kumar1, Bhargavi Ramanujam1, P S Chandra2, Deepa Dash1, Santosh Mehta1, Sharma Anubha1, Renjith Appukutan1, Manit Kumar Rana1, Manjari Tripathi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are routinely withdrawn during long-term video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring (LTM), to record sufficient number of seizures. The efficacy of rapid and slow AED taper has never been compared in a randomized control trial (RCT), which was the objective of this study.
METHODS: In this open-label RCT, patients aged 2-80 years with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) were randomly assigned (1:1) to rapid and slow AED taper groups. Outcome assessor was blinded to the allocation arms. Daily AED dose reduction was 30% to 50% and 15% to <30% in the rapid and slow taper groups, respectively. The primary outcome was difference in mean duration of LTM between the rapid and slow AED taper groups. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic yield, secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS), 4- and 24- hour seizure clusters, status epilepticus, and need for midazolam rescue treatment. The study was registered with Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI/2016/08/007207).
RESULTS: One hundred forty patients were randomly assigned to rapid (n = 70) or slow taper groups (n = 70), between June 13, 2016 and February 20, 2017. The difference in mean LTM duration between the rapid and slow taper groups was -1.8 days (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.9 to -0.8, P = .0006). Of the secondary outcome measures, time to first seizure (2.9 ± 1.7 and 4.6 ± 3.0 days in the rapid and slow taper groups respectively, P = .0002) and occurrence of 4-hour seizure clusters (11.9% and 2.9% in the rapid and slow taper groups, respectively, P = .04) were statistically significant. None of the other safety variables were different between the 2 groups. LTM diagnostic yield was 95.7% and 97.1%, in rapid and slow taper groups respectively (P = .46). SIGNIFICANCE: Rapid AED tapering has the advantage of significantly reducing LTM duration over slow tapering, without any serious adverse events. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2017 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antiepileptic drug withdrawal; long-term video-EEG monitoring; resistant epilepsy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29218705     DOI: 10.1111/epi.13966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  2 in total

1.  Fast Tapering of AEDs in the EMU: Worth the Risk or Risky Business?

Authors:  Barbara Dworetzky
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 7.500

2.  Comparison of Acute Withdrawal and Slow Taper of Antiseizure Medications during Video Electroencephalographic Monitoring: Efficacy for Shortening of Hospital Stay.

Authors:  Ayako Motoki; Naoki Akamatsu; Tomoyuki Fumuro; Ayako Miyoshi; Hideaki Tanaka; Koichi Hagiwara; Shinji Ohara; Takashi Kamada; Hiroshi Shigeto; Hiroyuki Murai
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.