Friederike Austein1, Monika Huhndorf2, Johannes Meyne3, Helmut Laufs3, Olav Jansen2, Thomas Lindner2. 1. Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany. friederike.austein@uksh.de. 2. Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany. 3. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is assumed that up to 30 % of clinically diagnosed acute ischaemic strokes (AIS) are actually stroke mimics (SM). Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of advanced CT including CT angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion (CTP) findings when distinguishing AIS from seizure-related SM. METHODS: Over a 22-month period data were gathered of patients who presented to our stroke centre with AIS-like symptoms and were examined immediately with an advanced CT, analysed and evaluated by two experienced neuroradiologists who preferred SM rather than AIS. All these patients additionally received electroencephalography and follow-up imaging. CTA was the important feature to exclude vessel occlusion or haemodynamic relevant stenosis. Perfusion patterns were retrospectively analysed qualitatively. RESULTS: The most common perfusion abnormality was cortical hyperperfusion (22/37 [59.5 %] patients) followed by a hypoperfusion pattern with a cortical-subcortical involvement (15/37 [40.5 %] patients) without evidence of vessel occlusion or stenosis. Seizure-related hyper- and hypoperfusion patterns typically crossed the normal anatomical vascular territories boundaries. CONCLUSION: Beyond its use in core and penumbra estimation, advanced CT provides important information to emergency physicians in the difficult clinical diagnosis when differentiating between AIS and seizure-related symptoms with an important impact on therapeutic decision-making. KEY POINTS: • Advanced CT helps to differentiate between ischaemic strokes and stroke mimics. • Seizure-related perfusion patterns are distinct from ischaemia hypoperfusion. • Advanced CT could improve rapid adequate treatment for AIS and seizure events.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is assumed that up to 30 % of clinically diagnosed acute ischaemic strokes (AIS) are actually stroke mimics (SM). Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of advanced CT including CT angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion (CTP) findings when distinguishing AIS from seizure-related SM. METHODS: Over a 22-month period data were gathered of patients who presented to our stroke centre with AIS-like symptoms and were examined immediately with an advanced CT, analysed and evaluated by two experienced neuroradiologists who preferred SM rather than AIS. All these patients additionally received electroencephalography and follow-up imaging. CTA was the important feature to exclude vessel occlusion or haemodynamic relevant stenosis. Perfusion patterns were retrospectively analysed qualitatively. RESULTS: The most common perfusion abnormality was cortical hyperperfusion (22/37 [59.5 %] patients) followed by a hypoperfusion pattern with a cortical-subcortical involvement (15/37 [40.5 %] patients) without evidence of vessel occlusion or stenosis. Seizure-related hyper- and hypoperfusion patterns typically crossed the normal anatomical vascular territories boundaries. CONCLUSION: Beyond its use in core and penumbra estimation, advanced CT provides important information to emergency physicians in the difficult clinical diagnosis when differentiating between AIS and seizure-related symptoms with an important impact on therapeutic decision-making. KEY POINTS: • Advanced CT helps to differentiate between ischaemic strokes and stroke mimics. • Seizure-related perfusion patterns are distinct from ischaemia hypoperfusion. • Advanced CT could improve rapid adequate treatment for AIS and seizure events.
Authors: Sven Rupprecht; Matthias Schwab; Clemens Fitzek; Otto W Witte; Christoph Terborg; Georg Hagemann Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Roland Wiest; Ferdinand von Bredow; Kaspar Schindler; Barbara Schauble; Johannes Slotboom; Caspar Brekenfeld; Luca Remonda; Gerhard Schroth; Christoph Ozdoba Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Maarten G Lansberg; Jun Lee; Soren Christensen; Matus Straka; Deidre A De Silva; Michael Mlynash; Bruce C Campbell; Roland Bammer; Jean-Marc Olivot; Patricia Desmond; Stephen M Davis; Geoffrey A Donnan; Gregory W Albers Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Nils Wahlgren; Niaz Ahmed; Antoni Dávalos; Gary A Ford; Martin Grond; Werner Hacke; Michael G Hennerici; Markku Kaste; Sonja Kuelkens; Vincent Larrue; Kennedy R Lees; Risto O Roine; Lauri Soinne; Danilo Toni; Geert Vanhooren Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-01-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Søren Christensen; Christopher R Levi; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis; Mark W Parsons Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: R López Ruiz; S Quintas; P Largo; M de Toledo; M T Carreras; A Gago-Veiga; R Manzanares; J Vivancos Journal: Neurologia (Engl Ed) Date: 2017-01-13
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J-M Olivot; M Mlynash; G Zaharchuk; M Straka; R Bammer; N Schwartz; M G Lansberg; M E Moseley; G W Albers Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Antonio Granato; Laura D'Acunto; Miloš Ajčević; Giovanni Furlanis; Maja Ukmar; Roberta Antea Pozzi Mucelli; Paolo Manganotti Journal: Neurol Sci Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 3.307
Authors: J L Restrepo-Vera; P Coscojuela; E Fonseca; M Quintana; S Sarria-Estrada; E Santamarina; L Abraira; M Sueiras; V Thonon; J Álvarez-Sabin; M Toledo; A Rovira Journal: J Neurol Date: 2022-02-13 Impact factor: 4.849