| Literature DB >> 29218472 |
Simon Willcock1,2, Oliver L Phillips3, Philip J Platts4, Andrew Balmford5, Neil D Burgess6,7, Jon C Lovett3, Antje Ahrends8, Julian Bayliss5, Nike Doggart9, Kathryn Doody10, Eibleis Fanning11, Jonathan M H Green12, Jaclyn Hall13, Kim L Howell14, Rob Marchant4, Andrew R Marshall4,15, Boniface Mbilinyi16, Pantaleon K T Munishi16, Nisha Owen11,17, Ruth D Swetnam18, Elmer J Topp-Jorgensen19, Simon L Lewis3,20.
Abstract
Upon publication of the original article [1], the authors noticed that the figure labelling for Fig. 4 in the online version was processed wrong. The top left panel should be panel a, with the panels to its right being b and c. d and e should be the panels on the lower row, and f is correct. The graphs themselves are all correct. It is simply the letter labels that are wrong.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29218472 PMCID: PMC5721094 DOI: 10.1186/s13021-017-0088-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Carbon Balance Manag ISSN: 1750-0680
Fig. 4The modelled effect of most influential, significant anthropogenic (a−c), climatic (d, e) and edaphic (f) variables of aboveground live carbon storage. Dashed red lines indicate the modelled 95% CI. The data is indicated by black lines above the x-axis