| Literature DB >> 29217921 |
Abdel Hamid El Bilbeisi1, Saeed Hosseini1, Kurosh Djafarian1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome is raising worldwide; however, the role of diet in the origin of metabolic syndrome is not understood well. This study identifies major dietary patterns among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with and without metabolic syndrome; and its association with metabolic syndrome components in Gaza Strip, Palestine.Entities:
Keywords: Dietary patterns; Factor analysis; Metabolic syndrome; Palestine; Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29217921 PMCID: PMC5614993 DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v27i3.4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ethiop J Health Sci ISSN: 1029-1857
Food groupings used in the dietary pattern analysis
| Food Groups: | Food Items |
| White breads, toasted bread, cooked white rice, pasta (macaroni, spaghetti | |
| Wheat bread, corn or canned, cooked cereals (as bulgur and the like) | |
| Boiled potatoes | |
| Cooked (lentils, chickpeas, black beans or white) | |
| (Beef, lamb), other meat (rabbit, duck), cold meats, hamburger | |
| Beef liver or chicken liver, viscera (tripe, brains and the like) | |
| Chicken with skin, skinless chicken | |
| Mixed fried fish, boiled or grilled fish (sardines, tuna), salted fish, canned | |
| Meats as mortadella, sausage, pizza, pie | |
| Eggs | |
| Skim milk, skimmed milk powder, yogurt | |
| Whole milk, (condensed milk, milk powder), cottage cheese curd or fresh | |
| Cooked spinach, (cabbage, cauliflower, broccoli), lettuce, onions, (carrots, | |
| Tomatoes, tomato sauce (ketchup) | |
| Lemons, (oranges, grapefruit and the like), bananas, apple or pear, | |
| Margarine, butter, mayonnaise | |
| Corn oil, sunflower oil | |
| Olives, olive oil | |
| Nuts (almonds, peanuts, hazelnuts, walnuts and the like), tahini (sesame | |
| Biscuit, (croissant, pastries), shortbread, brownie, (custard, custard pudding), | |
| Potato chips, bag of chips | |
| Spicy (pepper, chili) | |
| Soft drinks with sugar (as cola, orange, lemon, fanta and the like), low calorie | |
| Coffee, decaffeinated coffee, tea | |
| Salt, pickles |
Characteristics of the study populationin relation to the presence of MetS or its absence
| Variables | T2DM | MetS | Non-MetS | P | |
| 49.7±11.0 | 55.4±6.9 | 40.3±10.1 | .001 | ||
| Males | 482 (40.2) | 258 (34.5) | 224 (49.5) | .001 | |
| Females | 718 (59.8) | 490 (65.5) | 228 (50.5) | ||
| Married | 1160 (96.7) | 734 (98.1) | 426 (94.2) | .001 | |
| Unmarried | 40 (3.3) | 14 (1.9) | 26 (5.8) | ||
| Low education | 535 (44.6) | 451 (60.3) | 84 (18.6) | .001 | |
| High education | 665 (55.4) | 297 (39.7) | 368 (81.4) | ||
| Less than five | 429 (35.7) | 215 (50.1) | 214 (49.9) | .001 | |
| Five or more | 771 (64.25) | 533 (69.1) | 238 (30.9) | ||
| ≤ 2000 (NIS) | 1054 (87.8) | 706 (67.0) | 348 (33.0) | .001 | |
| > 2000 (NIS) | 146 (12.16) | 42 (28.8) | 104 (71.2) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 30.2±6.2 | 33.2±5.6 | 25.2±3.5 | .001 | |
| Yes | 985 (82.08) | 748 (75.9%) | 237 (24.1%) | .001 | |
| No | 215 (17.91) | 0 (0.0%) | 215 (100%) | ||
| Yes | 504 (42.0) | 495 (98.2%) | 9 (1.8%) | .001 | |
| No | 696 (58.0) | 253 (36.4%) | 443 (63.6%) | ||
| Yes | 487 (40.58) | 478 (98.2%) | 9 (1.8%) | .001 | |
| No | 713 (59.41) | 270 (37.9%) | 443 (62.1%) | ||
| ≥130/85 mmHg | 771 (64.25) | 731 (94.8%) | 40 (5.2%) | .001 | |
| <130/85 mmHg | 429 (35.75) | 17 (4.0%) | 412 (96.0%) | ||
| In our study, all participants previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus | |||||
Data are expressed as means ± SD for continuous variables and as percentage for categorical variables. The differences between means were tested by using independent sample t test. The chi-square test was used to examine differences in the prevalence of different categorical variable. P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
According to the IDF criteria: Central obesity: Waist circumference (cm): ≥ 94 in men and ≥ 80 in women. High TGs (mg/dl): ≥150 or specific treatment for this lipid abnormality. Low HDL-c (mg/dl):<40 in males and <50 in females or specific treatment for this lipid abnormality. High BP or treatment of previously diagnosed HTN.
Factor loading matrix for major dietary patterns
| Food Groups: | Dietary patterns | |
| Asian-like pattern | Sweet-soft drinks-snacks pattern | |
| 0.245 | 0.271 | |
| 0.206 | - | |
| 0.208 | - | |
| 0.223 | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| 0.323 | - | |
| 0.229 | - | |
| 0.985 | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| 0.209 | 0.249 | |
| - | 0.228 | |
| - | - | |
| - | 0.998 | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| 68.302 | 18.183 | |
Values < 0.20 were excluded for simplicity. Total variance explained by two factors: 86.485.
Characteristics and dietary intakes of study population by Tertile (T) categories of dietary pattern scores.
| Variables | Asian-like pattern | Sweet-soft drinks-snacks | ||||||
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T1 | T2 | T3 | |||
| Mean±SD | 46.1±11 | 50.0±10 | 53.0±10 | .001 | 49.5±11 | 48.8±11 | 50.8±10 | .518 |
| Males | 34.6 | 31.1 | 34.3 | 30.3 | 33.6 | 36.0 | ||
| Females | 32.5 | 34.8 | 32.7 | .721 | 35.3 | 33.2 | 31.5 | .057 |
| Married | 32.9 | 33.8 | 33.3 | 33.5 | 33.1 | 33.4 | ||
| Unmarried | 45.5 | 20.0 | 35.0 | .001 | 27.5 | 40.0 | 32.5 | .927 |
| Low education | 26.5 | 32.9 | 40.6 | 31.0 | 31.2 | 37.8 | ||
| High education | 38.8 | 33.7 | 27.5 | .001 | 35.2 | 35.0 | 29.8 | .023 |
| Less than five | 31.4 | 30.8 | 37.8 | 37.6 | 33.3 | 29.1 | ||
| Five or more | 34.4 | 34.8 | 30.8 | .004 | 31.0 | 33.3 | 35.7 | .001 |
| ≤ 2000 (NIS) | 32.5 | 33.1 | 34.4 | 33.0 | 32.9 | 34.1 | ||
| > 2000 (NIS) | 39.1 | 34.9 | 26.0 | .047 | 35.6 | 36.3 | 28.1 | .362 |
| Mean±SD | 28.6±5.6 | 30.4±5 | 31.5±6 | .005 | 29.4±6 | 30.0±6 | 31.2±6 | .347 |
ANOVA test was used for quantitative variables and chi-square for qualitative variables. P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Odd ratio and confidence interval for the MetS and its components across tertiles categories of dietary pattern scores.
| Asian-like pattern | Sweet-soft drinks-snacks pattern | ||||||||
| T1 | T2 | T3 | P value | OR (95%CI) | T1 | T2 | T3 | P value | OR (95%CI) |
| 30.5 | 31.4 | 38.1 | 0.001 | 0.751(.660–.853) | 25.9 | 35.3 | 38.8 | 0.001 | 0.610(.535–.696) |
| Adjusted | 0.003 | 0.766(.642–.914) | Adjusted | 0.317 | 0.912(.762–1.092) | ||||
| 29.2 | 34.9 | 35.9 | 0.001 | 0.552(.462–.660) | 32.6 | 33.1 | 34.3 | 0.030 | 0.836(.711–.983) |
| Adjusted | 0.027 | 0.797(.652–.974) | Adjusted | 0.345 | 0.913(.755–1.104) | ||||
| 28.8 | 30.8 | 40.4 | 0.001 | 0.782(.696–.878) | 24.0 | 33.5 | 42.5 | 0.001 | 0.678(.602–.764) |
| Adjusted | 0.001 | 0.791(.687–.911) | Adjusted | 0.213 | 0.913(.790–1.054) | ||||
| 29.8 | 30.2 | 40.0 | 0.001 | 0.822(.732–.922) | 24.0 | 33.0 | 43.0 | 0.001 | 0.693(.616–.781) |
| Adjusted | 0.023 | 0.853(.743–.978) | Adjusted | 0.329 | 0.932(.808–1.074) | ||||
| 30.7 | 31.9 | 37.4 | 0.001 | 0.773(.679–.879) | 26.6 | 35.9 | 37.5 | 0.001 | 0.648(.569–.739) |
| Adjusted | 0.024 | 0.815(.682–.973) | Adjusted | 0.793 | 1.025(.855–1.229) | ||||
The OR and CI for the MetS and its components across tertiles categories of dietary pattern scores were tested by binary logistic regression.
Adjusted for age, marital status, educational level, family number and monthly income. P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.