Literature DB >> 29217786

Transvaginal mesh failure: lessons for regulation of implantable devices.

Carl Heneghan1, Jeffrey K Aronson2, Ben Goldacre2, Kamal R Mahtani2, Annette Plüddemann2, Igho Onakpoya2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 29217786     DOI： 10.1136/bmj.j5515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Host-biomaterial interactions in mesh complications after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Roxanna E Abhari; Matthew L Izett-Kay; Hayley L Morris; Rufus Cartwright; Sarah J B Snelling
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Changing Device Regulations in the European Union: Impact on Research, Innovation and Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ksenija Vasiljeva; Bernard H van Duren; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  Impact of a mid-urethral synthetic mesh sling on long-term risk of systemic conditions in women with stress urinary incontinence: a national cohort study.

Authors:  P Muller; I Gurol-Urganci; R Thakar; M R Ehrenstein; J Van Der Meulen; S Jha
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 7.331

Review 4.  Cardiovascular health technology assessment: recommendations to improve the quality of evidence.

Authors:  Colin Berry; David Corcoran; Kenneth Mangion
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-02-27

5.  Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study).

Authors:  Kerry Avery; Shelley Potter; Jane Blazeby; Nicholas Wilson; Rhiannon Macefield; Sian Cousins; Barry Main; Natalie S Blencowe; Jesmond Zahra; Daisy Elliott; Robert Hinchliffe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Introduction and adoption of innovative invasive procedures and devices in the NHS: an in-depth analysis of written policies and qualitative interviews (the INTRODUCE study protocol).

Authors:  Sian Cousins; Hollie Richards; Jesmond Zahra; Daisy Elliott; Kerry Avery; Harry F Robertson; Sangeetha Paramasivan; Nicholas Wilson; Johnny Mathews; Zoe Tolkien; Barry G Main; Natalie S Blencowe; Robert Hinchliffe; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Identification of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set for surgical innovation: a targeted review of case studies of novel surgical devices.

Authors:  Nicholas Wilson; Rhiannon C Macefield; Christin Hoffmann; Matthew J Edmondson; Rachael L Miller; Emily N Kirkham; Natalie S Blencowe; Angus G K McNair; Barry G Main; Jane M Blazeby; Kerry N L Avery; Shelley Potter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 8.  Generating evidence for new high-risk medical devices.

Authors:  Bruce Campbell; John Wilkinson; Mirella Marlow; Murray Sheldon
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2019-09-04

9.  Women's Experiences of and Perspectives on Transvaginal Mesh Surgery for Stress Urine Incontinency and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mina Motamedi; Stacy M Carter; Chris Degeling
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 10.  Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for new surgical procedures and devices: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL-D studies to inform development of a core outcome set.

Authors:  R C Macefield; N Wilson; C Hoffmann; J M Blazeby; A G K McNair; K N L Avery; S Potter
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-10-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.