Literature DB >> 29217736

Generation of Structural MR Images from Amyloid PET: Application to MR-Less Quantification.

Hongyoon Choi1, Dong Soo Lee.   

Abstract

Structural MR images concomitantly acquired with PET images can provide crucial anatomic information for precise quantitative analysis. However, in the clinical setting, not all the subjects have corresponding MR images. Here, we developed a model to generate structural MR images from amyloid PET using deep generative networks. We applied our model to quantification of cortical amyloid load without structural MR.
Methods: We used florbetapir PET and structural MR data from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. The generative network was trained to generate realistic structural MR images from florbetapir PET images. After the training, the model was applied to the quantification of cortical amyloid load. PET images were spatially normalized to the template space using the generated MR, and then SUV ratio (SUVR) of the target regions was measured by predefined regions of interest. A real MR-based quantification was used as the gold standard to measure the accuracy of our approach. Other MR-less methods-a normal PET template-based, a multiatlas PET template-based, and a PET segmentation-based normalization/quantification-were also tested. We compared the performance of quantification methods using generated MR with that of MR-based and MR-less quantification methods.
Results: Generated MR images from florbetapir PET showed signal patterns that were visually similar to the real MR. The structural similarity index between real and generated MR was 0.91 ± 0.04. The mean absolute error of SUVR of cortical composite regions estimated by the generated MR-based method was 0.04 ± 0.03, which was significantly smaller than other MR-less methods (0.29 ± 0.12 for the normal PET template, 0.12 ± 0.07 for the multiatlas PET template, and 0.08 ± 0.06 for the PET segmentation-based methods). Bland-Altman plots revealed that the generated MR-based SUVR quantification was the closest to the SUVRs estimated by the real MR-based method.
Conclusion: Structural MR images were successfully generated from amyloid PET images using deep generative networks. Generated MR images could be used as templates for accurate and precise amyloid quantification. This generative method might be used to generate multimodal images of various organs for further quantitative analyses.
© 2018 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR generation; PET quantification; deep learning; florbetapir PET; generative adversarial network

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29217736      PMCID: PMC6910644          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.199414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  21 in total

Review 1.  Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging.

Authors:  Marine Soret; Stephen L Bacharach; Irène Buvat
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  PET/MRI: paving the way for the next generation of clinical multimodality imaging applications.

Authors:  Bernd J Pichler; Armin Kolb; Thomas Nägele; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Amyloid-β imaging with Pittsburgh compound B and florbetapir: comparing radiotracers and quantification methods.

Authors:  Susan M Landau; Christopher Breault; Abhinay D Joshi; Michael Pontecorvo; Chester A Mathis; William J Jagust; Mark A Mintun
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Using positron emission tomography and florbetapir F18 to image cortical amyloid in patients with mild cognitive impairment or dementia due to Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Adam S Fleisher; Kewei Chen; Xiaofen Liu; Auttawut Roontiva; Pradeep Thiyyagura; Napatkamon Ayutyanont; Abhinay D Joshi; Christopher M Clark; Mark A Mintun; Michael J Pontecorvo; P Murali Doraiswamy; Keith A Johnson; Daniel M Skovronsky; Eric M Reiman
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2011-07-11

5.  Implementation and validation of an adaptive template registration method for 18F-flutemetamol imaging data.

Authors:  Roger Lundqvist; Johan Lilja; Benjamin A Thomas; Jyrki Lötjönen; Victor L Villemagne; Christopher C Rowe; Lennart Thurfjell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2 PET Core: 2015.

Authors:  William J Jagust; Susan M Landau; Robert A Koeppe; Eric M Reiman; Kewei Chen; Chester A Mathis; Julie C Price; Norman L Foster; Angela Y Wang
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 21.566

7.  Use of florbetapir-PET for imaging beta-amyloid pathology.

Authors:  Christopher M Clark; Julie A Schneider; Barry J Bedell; Thomas G Beach; Warren B Bilker; Mark A Mintun; Michael J Pontecorvo; Franz Hefti; Alan P Carpenter; Matthew L Flitter; Michael J Krautkramer; Hank F Kung; R Edward Coleman; P Murali Doraiswamy; Adam S Fleisher; Marwan N Sabbagh; Carl H Sadowsky; Eric P Reiman; P Eric M Reiman; Simone P Zehntner; Daniel M Skovronsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Validation of a standardized normalization template for statistical parametric mapping analysis of 123I-FP-CIT images.

Authors:  Aurélie Kas; Pierre Payoux; Marie-Odile Habert; Zoulikha Malek; Yann Cointepas; Georges El Fakhri; Philippe Chaumet-Riffaud; Emmanuel Itti; Philippe Remy
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Feasibility of Computed Tomography-Guided Methods for Spatial Normalization of Dopamine Transporter Positron Emission Tomography Image.

Authors:  Jin Su Kim; Hanna Cho; Jae Yong Choi; Seung Ha Lee; Young Hoon Ryu; Chul Hyoung Lyoo; Myung Sik Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  MR-less surface-based amyloid assessment based on 11C PiB PET.

Authors:  Luping Zhou; Olivier Salvado; Vincent Dore; Pierrick Bourgeat; Parnesh Raniga; S Lance Macaulay; David Ames; Colin L Masters; Kathryn A Ellis; Victor L Villemagne; Christopher C Rowe; Jurgen Fripp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Clinical Personal Connectomics Using Hybrid PET/MRI.

Authors:  Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-01-15

2.  CycleGAN for style transfer in X-ray angiography.

Authors:  Oleksandra Tmenova; Rémi Martin; Luc Duong
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Deep learning for in vivo near-infrared imaging.

Authors:  Zhuoran Ma; Feifei Wang; Weizhi Wang; Yeteng Zhong; Hongjie Dai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Semantic Segmentation of White Matter in FDG-PET Using Generative Adversarial Network.

Authors:  Kyeong Taek Oh; Sangwon Lee; Haeun Lee; Mijin Yun; Sun K Yoo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Shifting machine learning for healthcare from development to deployment and from models to data.

Authors:  Angela Zhang; Lei Xing; James Zou; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 6.  A review on AI in PET imaging.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsubara; Masanobu Ibaraki; Mitsutaka Nemoto; Hiroshi Watabe; Yuichi Kimura
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 7.  60 Years of Achievements by KSNM in Neuroimaging Research.

Authors:  Jae Seung Kim; Hye Joo Son; Minyoung Oh; Dong Yun Lee; Hae Won Kim; Jungsu Oh
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-15

8.  Tau-Atrophy Variability Reveals Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Sandhitsu R Das; Xueying Lyu; Michael Tran Duong; Long Xie; Lauren McCollum; Robin de Flores; Michael DiCalogero; David J Irwin; Bradford C Dickerson; Ilya M Nasrallah; Paul A Yushkevich; David A Wolk
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Adaptive template generation for amyloid PET using a deep learning approach.

Authors:  Seung Kwan Kang; Seongho Seo; Seong A Shin; Min Soo Byun; Dong Young Lee; Yu Kyeong Kim; Dong Soo Lee; Jae Sung Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Amyloid PET Quantification Via End-to-End Training of a Deep Learning.

Authors:  Ji-Young Kim; Hoon Young Suh; Hyun Gee Ryoo; Dongkyu Oh; Hongyoon Choi; Jin Chul Paeng; Gi Jeong Cheon; Keon Wook Kang; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.