Literature DB >> 29216999

Characteristics, Predictors, and Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Coronary Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Differences Between Early and Late Events.

Tommaso Gori1, Melissa Weissner2, Svenja Gönner2, Franziska Wendling2, Helen Ullrich2, Stephen Ellis3, Remzi Anadol2, Alberto Polimeni2, Thomas Münzel2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study sought to investigate the incidence, characteristics, predictors, and possible mechanisms of early and 3-year coronary scaffold thrombosis (ScT).
BACKGROUND: An increased incidence of both early and late ScT has been shown in randomized trials.
METHODS: Consecutive patients were enrolled in a single-center registry. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed. Incidence and predictors of ScT were assessed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 657 patients (63 ± 12 years of age, 79% men, 21% diabetic, 64% acute coronary syndrome) who received 925 coronary bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) between May 2012 and January 2015 were enrolled. Clinical and procedural characteristics and outcome data at 1,076 (interquartile range: 762 to 1,206) days (3-year follow-up rate 93%) were collected. Twenty-eight ScTs were recorded: 14 early (Kaplan-Meier estimate: 2.2%), 5 late (Kaplan-Meier estimate: 0.9%), and 9 very late (Kaplan-Meier estimate: 1.7%). The incidence of ScT followed a U-shaped curve with highest incidence at the extremes of the distributions of reference vessel diameter (RVD) and the ratio of BRS nominal diameter to RVD. At quantitative coronary angiography, RVD (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04 to 0.49) and BRS oversizing (ratio of BRS nominal diameter to RVD >1.15; HR: 107.40; 95% CI: 9.20 to 1,261.30) emerged as potent predictors of early ScT. RVD (HR: 9.55; 95% CI: 3.90 to 23.42) and BRS undersizing (ratio of BRS nominal diameter to RVD <0.85; HR: 0.0004; 95% CI: 0.0000 to 0.0400) predicted late or very late ScT (all p < 0.0001). The incidence of both early and late or very late ScT were lower (∼80% reduction) when an optimal implantation technique was used. The most important factor appeared to be vessel and BRS sizing.
CONCLUSIONS: Different mechanisms underlie early and late ScT: although incomplete BRS deployment was a predictor of the former, the latter was associated with large vessel size and BRS undersizing. However, both phenomena are significantly less frequent with an optimized implantation technique. (Mainz Intracoronary Database. The Coronary Slow-flow and Microvascular Diseases Registry [MICAT]; NCT02180178).
Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioresorbable scaffold; stent thrombosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29216999     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  6 in total

1.  Clinical results of bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds in short and long coronary artery lesions using the PSP technique.

Authors:  Christine Reichart; Jochen Wöhrle; Sinisa Markovic; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Julia Seeger
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for percutaneous treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Polimeni; Remzi Anadol; Thomas Münzel; Martin Geyer; Salvatore De Rosa; Ciro Indolfi; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Long-term comparison of everolimus- vs. novolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in real world patients.

Authors:  Beytullah Cakal; Sinem Cakal; Oguz Karaca; Mehmet Onur Omaygenc; Filiz Kizilirmak Yilmaz; Haci Murat Gunes; Ozgur Ulas Ozcan; Arzu Yıldırım; Bilal Boztosun
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 1.426

Review 4.  Impact of PSP Technique on Clinical Outcomes Following Bioresorbable Scaffolds Implantation.

Authors:  Luis Ortega-Paz; Salvatore Brugaletta; Manel Sabaté
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Three-years outcomes of diabetic patients treated with coronary bioresorbable scaffolds.

Authors:  Remzi Anadol; Katharina Schnitzler; Liv Lorenz; Melissa Weissner; Helen Ullrich; Alberto Polimeni; Thomas Münzel; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 6.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a step back thinking of the future.

Authors:  Alberto Polimeni; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.426

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.