| Literature DB >> 29216848 |
Anne K Braczynski1, Marc A Brockmann2, Torben Scholz3, Jan-Philipp Bach4, Jörg B Schulz4, Simone C Tauber4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anterior sacral meningoceles are rare, and usually occur with other malformations of the posterior lower spine. While these are more frequently reported in pediatric cohorts, we report a case in an elderly woman. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Anterior sacral meningocele; Colorectal carcinoma; Meningitis; Occult spinal dysraphism
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29216848 PMCID: PMC5721539 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-017-0992-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Fig. 1Case time line. This time line presents the most important clinical events in this case. The time scale is in weeks
Fig. 2Neuroradiological Imaging. MRI imaging (a sagittal T1-SE post-contrast; b sagittal T2-TSE: sagittal fat-saturated T1-SE post-contrast; d sagittal T2-TSE, e coronally reconstructed CT; f axially reconstructed CT at the level marked by a line in d; g axial T2-TSE sequence at the level marked by a line in c). (a, c) Strong contrast enhancement of the meningeal structures due to the meningitis are shown in the post-contrast MRI series. The arrowhead in A exemplarily points at the strongly enhancing surface of the spinal cord. The arrow in A points at the contrast-enhancing filum terminale. (b) The level of the medullary cone is at the level of the vertebrates L3 and L4, which is unusually low, see arrow. (c) The distended rectum and a connection to the spinal canal are visible. The meningocele cannot be unequivocally delineated from the rectal carcinoma. (d, e) CT at the level marked by a line in d; (f) axial sequence at the level marked by a line in c) demonstrating a sacral menigocele with tethering of the spinal cord and bony dysraphism
Fig. 3Neurosurgical intraoperative situs. Intraoperative findings. (a) Opening of the dural sac with spinal root of S2 (arrow). (b) Pus and necrotic cell debris (stars indicate the borders) were visible upon opening of the dural sac. (c) Cauda fibers adhered to each other due to the necrotic cell debris (arrow). (d) Extracted necrotic cell debris without any indication of tumor infiltration in the neuropathologic examination. (e, f) The intradural spinal root of S2 (arrow) and amputated cauda equina below S2 is visible (stars indicate amputation line)
Fig. 4Neuropathologic findings. Histology of the tissue sample. (a) Overview of the tissue consisting of cell debris with sparse organisation (scale bar 500 μm, HE) and (b) detail (scale bar 100 μm). (c) Central nervous tissue (scale bar 100 μm, GFAP) as well as (d) infiltrative carcinoma cells (scale bar 100 μm, panCK) were absent. (e) The specimen were infiltrated by leukocytes and macrophages (scale bar 100 μm, CD45). (f) There were few EMA positive flat cells indicating presence of meningeal cell layer as a wall of the meningocele (scale bar 100 μm, EMA)