| Literature DB >> 29216828 |
Shigenori Hiraoka1, Shinichiro Maeshima2,3, Hideto Okazaki1, Hirokazu Hori1, Shinichiro Tanaka1, Sayaka Okamoto1, Reisuke Funahashi1, Kei Yagihashi1, Ikuko Fuse1, Naoki Asano1, Shigeru Sonoda1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thalamic hemorrhages cause motor paralysis, sensory impairment, and cognitive dysfunctions, all of which may significantly affect walking independence. We examined the factors related to independent walking in patients with thalamic hemorrhage who were admitted to a rehabilitation hospital.Entities:
Keywords: Ambulation; Hemorrhage; Outcome; Rehabilitation; Thalamus
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29216828 PMCID: PMC5721668 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-017-0991-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Fig. 1Computed tomography classification of thalamic hemorrhage. The hemorrhages were classified as follows: type I, hematoma localized in the thalamus; type II, hematoma extending into the internal capsule; and type III, hematoma extending into the midbrain
Functional ambulation classification
| Clinician-completed tick box of five broad categories of walking ability. |
| The categories range from independent walking outside to non-functional walking. |
| Patients are rated based on the following categories: |
| 0: Patient cannot walk or needs help from two or more persons. |
| 1: Patient needs firm continuous support from one person who helps with carrying the weight and balance. |
| 2: Patient needs the continuous or intermittent support of one person to help with balance and coordination. |
| 3: Patient requires verbal supervision or stand-by help from one person without physical contact. |
| 4: Patient can walk independently on level ground, but requires help on stairs, slopes, or uneven surfaces. |
| 5: Patient can walk independently anywhere. |
Holden MK et al. [8]
Comparisons between the independent- and dependent-walking groups
| Independent (FAC ≥4) n = 65 | Dependent (FAC <4) n = 63 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 65 (48–84) | 71 (40–93) | 0.0003 |
| Sex, male/female | 42/23 | 33/30 | 0.1595 |
| Duration from symptom onset to rehabilitation hospital admission (days) | 23 (11–48) | 28 (11–57) | 0.0045 |
| Lesion side, right/left | 30/35 | 33/30 | 0.4811 |
| Hematoma volume (mL) | 6 (0.9–17.3) | 8.6 (0.3–25.3) | 0.0038 |
| Hematoma type, I/II/III | 3/51/11 | 3/36/24 | 0.234 |
| Ventricle bleeding, present/absent | 38/27 | 48/15 | 0.0318 |
| National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale | 5 (1–17) | 10 (2–23) | <0.0001 |
| Mini-Mental State Examination (/30) | 26 (8–30) | 20 (6–30) | <0.0001 |
| Aphasia, present/absent | 20/45 | 22/41 | 0.617 |
| Unilateral neglect, present/absent | 9/56 | 24/39 | 0.0015 |
Data are presented as the number or as the mean and range
Fig. 2Decision-tree analysis for factors related to walking independence in patients with thalamic hemorrhage. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was placed in the first tier and patients were divided based on their score. For patients with an NIHSS score <6, the second tier was divided based on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, while patients with an NIHSS score ≥6 were divided based on age. Regarding the third tier, patients with an MMSE score <21 were further divided according to the presence/absence of ventricular bleeding, while patients <74 years of age were divided according to the hematoma volume