| Literature DB >> 29216824 |
Natalia Conde-Martínez1, Alejandro Acosta-González1, Luis E Díaz1, Edisson Tello2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Water evaporation in solar salterns creates salinity gradients that promote the adaptation of microbial species to different salinities. This competitive habitat challenges the metabolic capabilities of microorganisms and promotes alterations in their production of secondary metabolites. Thus, solar salterns are a potentially important source of new natural products. In Colombia, the most important and representative solar saltern is located in Manaure (La Guajira) in the north of Colombia. The aim of this study was to develop an alternative screening strategy to select halophilic bacteria as producers of bioactive compounds from mixed microbial cultures rather than individual environmental isolates. Brine and sediment samples from different ponds (across a salinity gradient) were inoculated in seven different culture media to grow bacteria and archaea, allowing for a total of 40 different mixed cultures. An organic extract from each mixed culture was obtained and tested against multidrug resistant pathogens, including Klebsiella pneumoniae, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis. In addition, the extracts were tested against two human cancer cell lines, cervical adenocarcinoma (SiHa) and lung carcinoma (A-549).Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial activity; Cytotoxic activity; Halophiles; Mixed cultures; Solar salterns
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29216824 PMCID: PMC5721385 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-017-1136-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Media selected for the growth of halophilic bacteria and archaea
| Medium | Observations | References | |
|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | Halophile Agar I | Halophilic Bacteria | Handbook of Microbiological Media [ |
| M2 | DSMZ 372 |
| German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Culture – DSMZ. Leibniz Institute. |
| M3 |
| Extreme halophilic Bacteria | Antón et al., 2002 [ |
| M4 |
| Extreme halophilic Bacteria | Antón et al., 2000 [ |
| M5 | MCAT | Extreme halophilic Archaea | Pesenti et al., 2008 [ |
| M6 | Halophilic Actinobacteria |
| Jung et al., 2000 [ |
| M7 | DSMZ 1018 |
| German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Culture – DSMZ. Leibniz Institute |
Fig. 1Solar saltern ponds located in the Big Group Salinas Manaure, La Guajira, Colombia
Antibacterial and cytotoxic activities of the extracts obtained from the 40 mixed cultures against the indicated multidrug resistant pathogens and human cancer cell lines
| Extract | Antibacterial Activity | Cytotoxic Activitya (IC50 μg/mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| MRSA | VRE |
| A549 | SiHa | L929 | |
| A1BM2–1 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| A1SM2–2 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C6BM2–3 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C6SM2–4 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C8BM2–5 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C8SM2–6 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| A1BM4–7 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| A1SM4–8 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C6BM4–9 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C6SM4–10 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C8BM4–11 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C8SM4–12 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| A1BM7–13 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| A1SM7–14 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C6BM7–15 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C6SM7–16 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C8BM7–17 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C8SM7–18 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| A1BM5–19 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| A1SM5–20 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C8BM5–21 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C8SM5–22 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| A1BM6–23 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| A1SM6–24 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C6BM6–25 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C6SM6–26 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C8BM6–27 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C8SM6–28 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| A1SM1–29 | + | + | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| A1BM1–30 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C6SM1–31 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C6BM1–32 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C8SM1–33 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C8BM1–34 | – | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| A1BM3–35 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| A1SM3–36 | + | + | – | – | 44.90 ± 3.77 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C6BM3–37 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C6SM3–38 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C8BM3–39 | + | – | – | – | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 |
| C8SM3–40 | – | – | – | – | 64.60 ± 4.91 | > 100 | > 100 |
a> 100: IC50 value over 100 μg/mL are considered not cytotoxic [59]
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree reconstruction based on 16S rRNA genes of the bacterial isolates and their closest relatives. a A1SM1–29 isolate and its closest relatives. b A1SM3–36 isolate and its closest relatives
Antibiotic susceptibility profile of the Vibrio sp. A1SM3–36-8 isolate
| Antibiotic | Susceptibilitya | Inhibition zone (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| Vancomycin | R | – |
| Amoxicillin | R | – |
| Penicillin G | R | – |
| Chloramphenicol | S | 28 |
| Erythromycin | I | 16 |
| Ampicillin | R | – |
| Tetracycline | I | 19 |
| Clindamycin | R | – |
| Cefoxitin | I | 18 |
| Nalidixic acid | I | 20 |
| Rifampicin | S | 23 |
aThe susceptibility ranges were classified according to Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria [26]. Resistant (R): Inhibition zones smaller than 11 mm; Intermediate (I): Inhibition zones between 11 and 22 mm determine an intermediate susceptibility; Susceptible (S): Inhibition zones greater than 22 mm determine susceptible strains
Fig. 3Bioautography assay with two extracts (E1 and E2) from the broth of different cultures of Vibrio sp. A1SM3–36-8 spotted on each TLC plate a against B. subtilis, and b against MRSA
1H and 13C NMR data for the major compound in the F3 fraction
| Position | δC, mult | δH, mult (J in Hz) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 175.5, s | – |
| 2 | 35.9, t | 2.22, t (8.0) |
| 3 | 25.5, t | 1.63, m |
| 4 | 29.2, t | 1.26, br s |
| 5 | 29.3, t | |
| 6, 7, 8 | 29.5, t | |
| 9 | 29.5, t | |
| 10 | 29.6, t | |
| 11 | 29.6, t | |
| 16 | 29.7, t | |
| 17,18 | 29.8, t | |
| 19 | 29.5, t | |
| 20 | 31.9, t | |
| 21 | 22,7, t | |
| 12,15 | 27.2, t | 2.01, dd (12.1, 6.4) |
| 13 | 129.9, d | 5.36, t (4.7) |
| 14 | 129.9, d | |
| 22 | 14.1, q | 0.88, t (6.7) |
Fig. 4Molecular structure of 13-cis-docosenamide