Literature DB >> 29216789

Open book exams: A potential solution to the "full curriculum"?

Andrew Teodorczuk1,2, James Fraser1, Gary D Rogers1,2.   

Abstract

In this Personal View article, as curriculum designers, we consider whether there is a place for open book exams in Medical School curricula. Specifically, at a time when medical teachers complain about the difficulties of delivering a full curriculum, we propose that open book assessment approaches may help to free up the curriculum as learners become less reliant on memorizing facts. Moreover deeper learning of higher level outcomes can be achieved and more authentic assessment approaches undertaken. We also look at the recent literature and consider reasons, both for and against open book exams, at theoretical and practical levels. Though there are potential challenges with delivering an open book exam, we conclude that the benefits appear to outweigh these difficulties. As part of a balanced assessment strategy it may be necessary and timely to adopt open book exams.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29216789     DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1412412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  2 in total

1.  Collaborative case-based learning with programmatic team-based assessment: a novel methodology for developing advanced skills in early-years medical students.

Authors:  Mariel James; Ana Madeira Teixeira Baptista; Deepak Barnabas; Agata Sadza; Susan Smith; Omar Usmani; Chris John
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  Testing Effect on High-Level Cognitive Skills.

Authors:  Jamie L Jensen; Mark A McDaniel; Tyler A Kummer; Patricia D D M Godoy; Bryn St Clair
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.325

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.