Literature DB >> 29216781

Comparative analyses of species delimitation methods with molecular data in snappers (Perciformes: Lutjaninae).

Raimundo da Silva1, Pedro L V Peloso2, Marcelo José Sturaro3, Ivana Veneza1, Iracilda Sampaio4, Horacio Schneider4, Grazielle Gomes1.   

Abstract

The integration of approaches that allow the incorporation of stochasticity of gene histories with phylogenetic methods resulted in new approaches for the old issue of species delimitation. Nevertheless, coalescent methods seem problematic for taxa with large effective population size and shallow temporal diversification (like marine fishes). Here, we investigate the performance of single-locus (cytochrome oxidase 1, commonly used in DNA barcoding initiatives) methods for molecular species delimitation in snappers of Lutjaninae from the Western Atlantic and Pacific Eastern. Our results show incongruences among methods. ABGD, PTP and mPTP trend towards a lower number of estimated species. Phylogenetic-coalescent methods with single threshold were majority congruent for a same number of lineages. On the other hand, algorithms with multiple thresholds tend to estimate a higher number of potential species. We do not endorse the use of single-locus for species delimitation, but we do reinforce that single-locus data is sufficient to flag many problems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beast; COI; GMYC; mtDNA; species delimitation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29216781     DOI: 10.1080/24701394.2017.1413364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal        ISSN: 2470-1394            Impact factor:   1.514


  2 in total

1.  Species identification and connectivity of marine amphipods in Canada's three oceans.

Authors:  Astrid Tempestini; Søren Rysgaard; France Dufresne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  DNA barcoding of Austrian snow scorpionflies (Mecoptera, Boreidae) reveals potential cryptic diversity in Boreus westwoodi.

Authors:  Lukas Zangl; Elisabeth Glatzhofer; Raphael Schmid; Susanne Randolf; Stephan Koblmüller
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.