Literature DB >> 29216536

Myelodysplastic syndromes without peripheral monocytosis but with evidence of marrow monocytosis share clinical and molecular characteristics with CMML.

E Schuler1, F Frank2, B Hildebrandt3, B Betz3, C Strupp2, M Rudelius4, C Aul5, T Schroeder2, N Gattermann2, R Haas2, U Germing2.   

Abstract

MDS patients may present with monocytic marrow proliferation not fulfilling criteria for CMML. We analyzed MDS patients with or without a marrow monocytic proliferation by following up the amount of monocytic proliferation and characterizing their molecular profile. 315 MDS patients of Duesseldorf MDS registry were divided into two groups: A) 183 patients with monocytic esterase positive cells in marrow and monocytes between 101 and 900/μl in blood and B) 132 patients without monocytic esterase positive cells in marrow and monocytes in blood ≤100/μl. Twenty patients of each group were screened with regard to ASXL1, TET2, RUNX1, SETBP1, NRAS, and SRSF2 using Illumina myeloid panel. Group A patients were older, had significantly higher WBC, hemoglobin levels, neutrophils and platelets. CMML evolution rates were 4.9% and 1.5%, respectively (p=n.s.). TET2, NRAS and SRFS2 mutation frequencies were higher in group A and four patients had coexisting TET2 and SRFS2 mutation, which was shown to be characteristic but not specific for CMML. MDS patients with marrow monocytic proliferation have a more CMML-like pheno- and genotype and develop CMML more often. Those patients could potentially be very early stages of CMML or represent a CMML-like myeloid neoplasma with marrow adherence of the monocytic cell population.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMML; MDS; MDS/MPN-overlap; Monocytosis; WHO classification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29216536     DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Res        ISSN: 0145-2126            Impact factor:   3.156


  5 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory Evaluation and Pathological Workup of Neoplastic Monocytosis - Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Beyond.

Authors:  Siba El Hussein; Joseph D Khoury; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Sanam Loghavi
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  Clinical and Molecular Approach to Adult-Onset, Neoplastic Monocytosis.

Authors:  Rory M Shallis; Alexa J Siddon; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  Elevated mature monocytes in bone marrow accompanied with a higher IPSS-R score predicts a poor prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  An Wu; Panpan Gao; Ningning Wu; Cong Shi; Zhenya Huang; Chunmeng Rong; Ye Sun; Lixia Sheng; Guifang Ouyang; Qitian Mu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Multicenter validation of the flow measurement of classical monocyte fraction for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia diagnosis.

Authors:  Sihem Tarfi; Véronique Harrivel; Florent Dumezy; Julien Guy; Mikael Roussel; Aguirre Mimoun; Pierre Fenaux; Nicolas Chapuis; Eric Solary; Dorothée Selimoglu-Buet; Orianne Wagner-Ballon
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 5.  Proposed diagnostic criteria for classical chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), CMML variants and pre-CMML conditions.

Authors:  Peter Valent; Attilio Orazi; Michael R Savona; Mrinal M Patnaik; Francesco Onida; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Detlef Haase; Torsten Haferlach; Chiara Elena; Lisa Pleyer; Wolfgang Kern; Tea Pemovska; Gregory I Vladimer; Julie Schanz; Alexandra Keller; Michael Lübbert; Thomas Lion; Karl Sotlar; Andreas Reiter; Theo De Witte; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Klaus Geissler; Eric Padron; Michael Deininger; Alberto Orfao; Hans-Peter Horny; Peter L Greenberg; Daniel A Arber; Luca Malcovati; John M Bennett
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 9.941

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.