Literature DB >> 29216446

Comparison of 2 weekly-equalized volume resistance-training routines using different frequencies on body composition and performance in trained males.

Fu Leon Yue1, Bettina Karsten1,2, Eneko Larumbe-Zabala3, Marcos Seijo1, Fernando Naclerio1.   

Abstract

The present study compared the effects of 2 weekly-equalized volume and relative load interventions on body composition, strength, and power. Based on individual baseline maximal strength values, 18 recreationally trained men were pair-matched and consequently randomly assigned to one of the following experimental groups: a low volume per session with a high frequency (LV-HF, n = 9) group who trained for 4 days (Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays) or a high volume per session and low frequency (HV-LF, n = 9) group who trained for 2 days (Mondays and Thursdays). Both groups performed 2 different routines over 6 weeks. Participants were tested pre- and post- intervention for maximal strength, upper body power, fat-free mass, limb circumferences, and muscle thickness. Compared with baseline values, both groups increased their fat-free mass (HV-LF: +1.19 ± 1.94; LV-HF: +1.36 ± 1.06 kg, p < 0.05) and vastus medialis thickness (HV-LF: +2.18 ± 1.88, p < 0.01; LV-HF: +1.82 ± 2.43 mm, p < 0.05), but only the HV-LF group enhanced arm circumference (1.08 ± 1.47 cm, p < 0.05) and elbow flexors thickness (2.21 ± 2.81 mm, P < 0.01) values and decreased their fat mass (-2.41 ± 1.10, P < 0.01). Both groups improved (p < 0.01) the maximal loads lifted in the bench press (LV-HF: +0.14 ± 0.01; HV-LF: +0.14 ± 0.01 kg·body mass-1) and the squat (LV-HF: +0.14 ± 0.06; HV-LF: 0.17 ± 0.01 kg·body mass-1) exercises as well as in upper body power (LV-HF: +0.22 ± 0.25; HV-LF: +0.27 ± 0.22 W·body mass-1) Although both training strategies improved performance and lower body muscle mass, only the HV-LF protocol increased upper body hypertrophy and improved body composition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conception d’une séance; force; hypertrophie; hypertrophy; muscle thickness; power; puissance; strength; workout design; épaisseur du muscle

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29216446     DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  6 in total

1.  Effects of photobiomodulation on muscle strength in post-menopausal women submitted to a resistance training program.

Authors:  Johny N Almeida; Wagner L Prado; Caio M Terra; Matheus G Oliveira; Renato A Garcia; Carlos E Pinfildi; João P Botero
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Manipulating Resistance Training Variables to Induce Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy: A Brief Narrative Review.

Authors:  Júlio Benvenutti Bueno DE Camargo; Felipe Alves Brigatto; Rafael Sakai Zaroni; Thiago Barbosa Trindade; Moisés Diego Germano; Antonio Carlos Tavares Junior; Thiago Pires DE Oliveira; Paulo Henrique Marchetti; Jonato Prestes; Charles Ricardo Lopes
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2022-07-01

3.  Effects of different resistance training frequencies on body composition and muscular performance adaptations in men.

Authors:  Hamid Arazi; Abbas Asadi; Paulo Gentil; Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo; Pooria Jahangiri; Adel Ghorbani; Anthony C Hackney; Hassane Zouhal
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Effect of different training frequencies on maximal strength performance and muscle hypertrophy in trained individuals-a within-subject design.

Authors:  Ricardo P Neves; Felipe C Vechin; Emerson L Teixeira; Demostenys D da Silva; Carlos Ugrinowitsch; Hamilton Roschel; André Y Aihara; Valmor Tricoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  Weekly Training Frequency Effects on Strength Gain: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Grant W Ralston; Lon Kilgore; Frank B Wyatt; Duncan Buchan; Julien S Baker
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2018-08-03

6.  Effects of Variations in Resistance Training Frequency on Strength Development in Well-Trained Populations and Implications for In-Season Athlete Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Cuthbert; G Gregory Haff; Shawn M Arent; Nicholas Ripley; John J McMahon; Martin Evans; Paul Comfort
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 11.136

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.