| Literature DB >> 29216028 |
Donald R Hopkins, Ernesto Ruiz-Tiben, Mark L Eberhard, Sharon L Roy, Adam J Weiss.
Abstract
Dracunculiasis (Guinea worm disease) is caused by Dracunculus medinensis, a parasitic worm. Approximately 1 year after a person acquires infection from contaminated drinking water, the worm emerges through the skin, usually on a lower limb (1). Pain and secondary bacterial infection can cause temporary or permanent disability that disrupts work and schooling. The campaign to eradicate dracunculiasis worldwide began in 1980 at CDC. In 1986, the World Health Assembly called for dracunculiasis elimination,* and the global Guinea Worm Eradication Program, led by the Carter Center and supported by the World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund, CDC, and other partners, began assisting ministries of health in countries with endemic dracunculiasis. In 1986, an estimated 3.5 million cases occurred each year in 20 countries in Africa and Asia (2). Since then, although the goal of eradicating dracunculiasis has not been achieved, considerable progress has been made. Compared with the 1986 estimate, the annual number of reported cases in 2016 has declined by >99%, and cases are confined to three countries with endemic disease. This report updates published (3-4) and unpublished surveillance data reported by ministries of health and describes progress toward dracunculiasis eradication during January 2016-June 2017. In 2016, a total of 25 cases were reported from three countries (Chad [16], South Sudan [six], Ethiopia [three]), compared with 22 cases reported from the same three countries and Mali in 2015 (Table 1). The 14% increase in cases from 2015 to 2016 was offset by the 25% reduction in number of countries with indigenous cases. During the first 6 months of 2017, the overall number of cases declined to eight, all in Chad, from 10 cases in three countries (Chad [four], South Sudan [four] and Ethiopia [two]) during the same period of 2016. Continued active surveillance, aggressive detection, and appropriate management of cases are essential eradication program components; however, epidemiologic challenges, civil unrest, and insecurity pose potential barriers to eradication.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29216028 PMCID: PMC5757633 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6648a3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ISSN: 0149-2195 Impact factor: 17.586
Number of reported indigenous human dracunculiasis cases, by country –– worldwide, January 2015–June 2017
| Country | Cases by period | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan–Dec 2015 | Jan–Dec 2016 | % Change Jan–Dec 2015 to Jan–Dec 2016 | Jan–Jun, 2016* | Jan–Jun, 2017 | % Change Jan–Jun 2016 to Jan–Jun 2017 | |
| No. | No. (% contained) | No. | No. (% contained) | |||
| Chad | 9 | 16 (56) | 78 | 4 | 8 (75) | 100 |
| Ethiopia | 3 | 3 (67) | 0 | 2 | 0 (—) | |
| Mali† | 5 | 0 (—) | 0 | 0 (—) | 0 | |
| South Sudan | 5 | 6 (50) | 20 | 4 | 0 (—) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* No international importations were reported during the 18-month period January 2016–June 2017.
† Civil unrest and insecurity continued to constrain program operations in regions with endemic dracunculiasis (Gao, Kidal, Mopti, and Timbuktu) during 2016–2017.
Reported human dracunculiasis cases, surveillance, and status of local interventions in villages with endemic disease, by country –– worldwide, 2016
| Cases/Surveillance/Intervention status | Country | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chad* | Ethiopia | Mali† | South Sudan | Total | |
|
| |||||
| No. indigenous, 2016 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
|
| No. imported,§ 2016 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| % Contained¶ in 2016 | 56 | 67 | 0 | 50 |
|
| % Change in indigenous cases in villages/localities under surveillance, same period 2015 and 2016 | 78 | 0 | 20 |
| |
|
| |||||
| No. of villages | 1,799 | 152 | 450 | 2,736 |
|
| % Reporting monthly | 100 | 89 | 100 | 99 |
|
| No. reporting ≥1 case | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
|
| No. reporting only imported** cases | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| No. reporting indigenous cases | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
|
|
| |||||
| No. of villages with endemic dracunculiasis | 20 | 5 | 3 | 9 |
|
| % Reporting monthly†† | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
|
| % Filters in all households†† | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
|
| % Using temephos†† | 30 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
|
| % ≥1 safe water source†† | 73 | 100 | 66 | 56 |
|
| % Providing health education†† | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
|
* Participants at the annual Chad Guinea Worm Eradication Program review meeting in November 2014 adopted “1+ case village” as a new description for villages in Chad affected by human cases of Guinea worm disease or dogs infected with Guinea worms and defined as “a village with one or more indigenous or imported cases of Guinea worm infections in humans, dogs, or cats in the current calendar year or previous year.”
† Civil unrest and insecurity continued to constrain Guinea Worm Eradication Program operations (supervision, surveillance, and interventions in Gao, Kidal, and Timbuktu regions).
§ Imported from another country.
¶ Transmission from a patient with dracunculiasis is contained only if all of the following conditions are met for each emerged worm: 1) the infected patient is identified ≤24 hours after worm emergence; 2) the patient has not entered any water source because the worm emerged; 3) a village volunteer or other health care provider has managed the patient properly, by cleaning and bandaging the lesion until the worm has been fully removed manually and by providing health education to discourage the patient from contaminating any water source (if two or more emerging worms are present, transmission is not contained until the last worm is removed); 4) the containment process, including verification of dracunculiasis, is validated by a Guinea Worm Eradication Program supervisor within 7 days of emergence of the worm; and 5) temephos is used to treat potentially contaminated surface water if any uncertainty about contamination of these sources of drinking water exists, or if a such a source of drinking water is known to have been contaminated.
** Imported from another in-country village with endemic disease.
†† The denominator is the number of endemic villages/localities where the program applied interventions during 2015–2016.