Anne-Marie Conn1, Moira A Szilagyi2, Sandra H Jee1, Jody T Manly3, Rahil Briggs4, Peter G Szilagyi2. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California. 3. Department of Clinical and Social Psychology, University of Rochester. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Health System, Albert Einstein School of Medicine.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Pediatricians recognize a need to mitigate the negative impact that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) can have on health and development. However, ACEs screening and interventions in primary care pediatrics may be inhibited by concerns about parental perceptions. We assessed parent perspectives of screening for ACEs in the pediatric primary care setting, to understand their views on the potential impact of their ACEs on their parenting and to identify opportunities for pediatric anticipatory guidance. METHOD: We used purposive sampling to recruit parents of children <6 years receiving care at an urban, pediatric clinic. Semistructured questions guided 1:1 interviews that were later coded by multiple researchers to verify reliability. A thematic framework approach guided analysis and identified main themes and subthemes. RESULTS: We reached thematic saturation after 15 parent interviews, which consistently revealed 3 interrelated themes. First, parents strongly supported ACEs screening as a bridge to needed services, and they recommended using a trauma-sensitive, person-centered approach in pediatric practices. Second, parents understood the intergenerational impact of ACEs and expressed a desire to break the cycle of adversity. Finally, parents saw their child's pediatrician as a potential change-agent who could provide support to meet their parenting goals. DISCUSSION: Parents want to discuss their ACEs and receive help and guidance from pediatricians. Furthermore, they perceive their child's pediatrician as having an important role to play in meeting their parenting goals. It is important to ensure that pediatricians have the training, skills and familiarity with available resources to meet parental expectations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
INTRODUCTION: Pediatricians recognize a need to mitigate the negative impact that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) can have on health and development. However, ACEs screening and interventions in primary care pediatrics may be inhibited by concerns about parental perceptions. We assessed parent perspectives of screening for ACEs in the pediatric primary care setting, to understand their views on the potential impact of their ACEs on their parenting and to identify opportunities for pediatric anticipatory guidance. METHOD: We used purposive sampling to recruit parents of children <6 years receiving care at an urban, pediatric clinic. Semistructured questions guided 1:1 interviews that were later coded by multiple researchers to verify reliability. A thematic framework approach guided analysis and identified main themes and subthemes. RESULTS: We reached thematic saturation after 15 parent interviews, which consistently revealed 3 interrelated themes. First, parents strongly supported ACEs screening as a bridge to needed services, and they recommended using a trauma-sensitive, person-centered approach in pediatric practices. Second, parents understood the intergenerational impact of ACEs and expressed a desire to break the cycle of adversity. Finally, parents saw their child's pediatrician as a potential change-agent who could provide support to meet their parenting goals. DISCUSSION: Parents want to discuss their ACEs and receive help and guidance from pediatricians. Furthermore, they perceive their child's pediatrician as having an important role to play in meeting their parenting goals. It is important to ensure that pediatricians have the training, skills and familiarity with available resources to meet parental expectations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Leanne Whiteside-Mansell; Lorraine McKelvey; Jennifer Saccente; James P Selig Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sven-Olof Andersson; Eva-Maria Annerbäck; Hans Peter Söndergaard; Johan Hallqvist; Per Kristiansson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marcela Lopez; Monica O Ruiz; Cynthia R Rovnaghi; Grace K-Y Tam; Jitka Hiscox; Ian H Gotlib; Donald A Barr; Victor G Carrion; Kanwaljeet J S Anand Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2021-01-18 Impact factor: 3.756