Literature DB >> 29215710

Impact of nationwide health insurance coverage for non-invasive prenatal testing.

Valentina Vinante1, Bettina Keller1, Evelyn A Huhn1, Dorothy Huang1, Olav Lapaire1, Gwendolin Manegold-Brauer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the changes in women's choices for prenatal testing after the introduction of nationwide health insurance coverage for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in Switzerland.
METHODS: The present retrospective study reviewed data from all women with singleton pregnancies who presented at the prenatal unit of Basel University Hospital, Switzerland, for first-trimester screening between July 15, 2014, and December 31, 2015. Women were divided into three categories according to their risk for aneuploidy, and the uptake of NIPT in the period before and after the introduction of the nationwide coverage for NIPT was compared.
RESULTS: Overall, 887 women were included in the study: 573 screens were carried out before (group 1) and 314 after (group 2) the introduction of insurance coverage for NIPT. In group 1, 53 (9.2%) had NIPT as compared with 72 (22.9%) in group 2. Among women with intermediate risk for aneuploidies and basic insurance coverage, NIPT increased by 56% (12/88 [14%] vs 32/46 [70%]; P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: There was a notable increase in the uptake of NIPT; uptake was most significant among women with basic health insurance and intermediate risk for aneuploidy.
© 2017 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell-free DNA analysis; Fetal aneuploidies; First-trimester screening; Insurance coverage; Invasive procedures; Non-invasive prenatal testing; Prenatal care; Prenatal screening

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29215710     DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  5 in total

1.  Non-invasive prenatal testing in mitigating concerns from invasive prenatal diagnostic testing: retrospective assessment of utility in an academic healthcare system in the US.

Authors:  Kibum Kim; Linda Kaitlyn Craft
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Patient-friendly integrated first trimester screening by NIPT and fetal anomaly scan.

Authors:  Malgorzata Ilona Srebniak; Maarten F C M Knapen; Marieke Joosten; Karin E M Diderich; Sander Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 3.  Sex selection and non-invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues.

Authors:  Hilary Bowman-Smart; Julian Savulescu; Christopher Gyngell; Cara Mand; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  The Knowledge, Attitude, Practices, and Satisfaction of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing among Chinese Pregnant Women under Different Payment Schemes: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Wenjun Zhu; XiaoXiao Ling; Wenru Shang; Jiayan Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Analysis of cell-free DNA in a consecutive series of 13,607 routine cases for the detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies in a single center in Germany.

Authors:  Heike Borth; Anna Teubert; Ralf Glaubitz; Sarah Knippenberg; Nargül Kutur; Thomas Winkler; Bernd Eiben
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.344

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.