| Literature DB >> 29215556 |
Xiaolong Wang1, Xuan Wang2, Qingyin Di3, Hongli Zhao4, Bo Liang5, Jingkai Yang6.
Abstract
SnO₂ and F doped SnO₂ (FTO) nanoparticles (NPs) have been synthesized by the hydrothermal method with subsequent annealing at 500 °C. The microstructure and photoluminescence (PL) property of SnO₂ and FTO NPs have been investigated, and an assumption model about the luminescence process of FTO NPs has been proposed. All of the SnO₂ and FTO NPs possess polycrystalline tetragonal rutile structures, and the average size in the range of 16.5-20.2 nm decreases with the increasing of F doping content. The doping element F is shown a uniformly distribution by electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) mapping. The oxygen vacancy concentration becomes higher as is verified by Raman and X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS). There are three kinds of oxygen chemical states in SnO₂ and FTO NPs, in which Oα corresponds to oxygen vacancies. The room temperature PL position is observed to be independent of F doping content. F- may substitute O2- into the SnO₂ lattice by generating F O + and one extra e-, which can combine with V O + or V O + + to generate V O 0 or V O + to ensure charge balance.Entities:
Keywords: F doped SnO2 nanoparticles; hydrothermal method; oxygen vacancies; photoluminescence property
Year: 2017 PMID: 29215556 PMCID: PMC5744333 DOI: 10.3390/ma10121398
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of tin oxide (SnO2) and F doped SnO2 (FTO) nanoparticles (NPs).
Lattice information calculated from XRD of SnO2 and FTO NPs.
| Samples | D-Spacing | Lattice Parameters | Daver (nm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d110 (Å) | d101 (Å) | d211 (Å) | a (Å) | c (Å) | V (Å3) | ||
| PDF#71-0652 | 3.350 | 2.644 | 1.764 | 4.738 | 3.187 | 71.5 | — |
| Undoped | 3.351 | 2.647 | 1.763 | 4.730 | 3.194 | 71.44 | 20.18 |
| 10 at. % | 3.351 | 2.650 | 1.765 | 4.731 | 3.198 | 71.60 | 18.19 |
| 30 at. % | 3.356 | 2.653 | 1.763 | 4.718 | 3.208 | 71.41 | 17.08 |
| 50 at. % | 3.343 | 2.647 | 1.761 | 4.718 | 3.197 | 71.16 | 16.59 |
Figure 2Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) images, high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern, and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) maps of SnO2 and FTO NPs: (a) TEM image of SnO2 NPs; (b) HRTEM image with inset SAED pattern of SnO2 NPs; (c) TEM image of FTO NPs with 50 at. % F doping; (d–f) F, O and Sn EELS element mapping of FTO NPs with 50 at. % F doping, respectively.
Figure 3Raman spectra of SnO2 and FTO NPs.
Figure 4(a) Reflectance spectra of SnO2 and FTO NPs; (b) Plot of (αhν)2 versus photon energy (hν) of SnO2 and FTO NPs.
The optical band gap of SnO2 and FTO NPs.
| Samples | Undoped | 10 at. % | 30 at. % | 50 at. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eg (eV) | 3.633 | 3.681 | 3.682 | 3.684 |
Figure 5XPS spectra of SnO2 and FTO NPs: (a) Sn3d; (b) O1s.
Figure 6Gaussian deconvoluted X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum of O1s of SnO2 and FTO NPs.
Binding energy, FWHM and the relative content of Gaussian peaks and relative content of O1s of SnO2 and FTO NPs.
| Sample | O1s | Relative Content of O | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative Content | Gaussian Peak | Peak Position (eV) | Area (%) | ||
| Undoped | 16.3 at. % | Oab | 530.9 | 14.85 | 4.04 at. % |
| O | 529.99 | 24.78 | |||
| Oβ | 529.01 | 60.37 | |||
| 10 at. % | 18.55 at. % | Oab | 531.3 | 12.2 | 5.5 at. % |
| Oα | 530.33 | 29.66 | |||
| Oβ | 529.32 | 58.13 | |||
| 30 at. % | 24.36 at. % | Oab | 532.02 | 15.46 | 6.12 at. % |
| O | 531.25 | 25.12 | |||
| Oβ | 530.37 | 59.42 | |||
| 50 at. % | 21.55 at. % | Oab | 531.46 | 13.64 | 4.45 at. % |
| O | 530.58 | 20.67 | |||
| Oβ | 529.71 | 65.69 | |||
Figure 7(a) Room temperature PL spectra of SnO2 and FTO NPs annealed; (b) Gaussian deconvoluted PL spectrum of FTO NPs with 50 at. % F doping.
Figure 8Schematic representation of relaxation process in photoexcited FTO NPs.