Literature DB >> 29215350

Prevalence and types of Campylobacter on poultry farms and in their direct environment.

Franciska M Schets1, Wilma F Jacobs-Reitsma1, Rozemarijn Q J van der Plaats1, Lianne Kerkhof-De Heer1, Angela H A M van Hoek1, Raditijo A Hamidjaja1, Ana Maria de Roda Husman1, Hetty Blaak1.   

Abstract

To study whether broiler and layer farms contribute to the environmental Campylobacter load, environmental matrices at or close to farms, and caecal material from chickens, were examined. Similarity between Campylobacter from poultry and environment was tested based on species identification and Multilocus Sequence Typing. Campylobacter prevalence in caecal samples was 97% at layer farms (n = 5), and 93% at broiler farms with Campylobacter-positive flocks (n = 2/3). Campylobacter prevalence in environmental samples was 24% at layer farms, and 29% at broiler farms with Campylobacter-positive flocks. Campylobacter was detected in soil and surface water, not in dust and flies. Campylobacter prevalence in adjacent and remote surface waters was not significantly (P > 0.1) different. Detected species were C. coli (52%), C. jejuni (40%) and C. lari (7%) in layers, and C. jejuni (100%) in broilers. Identical sequence types (STs) were detected in caecal material and soil. A deviating species distribution in surface water adjacent to farms indicated a high background level of environmental Campylobacter. STs from layer farms were completely deviant from surface water STs. The occasional detection of identical STs in broilers, wastewater at broiler farms and surface water in the farm environment suggested a possible contribution of broiler farms to the aquatic environmental Campylobacter load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29215350     DOI: 10.2166/wh.2017.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Water Health        ISSN: 1477-8920            Impact factor:   1.744


  10 in total

1.  The prevalence of Campylobacter species in broiler flocks and their environment: assessing the efficiency of chitosan/zinc oxide nanocomposite for adopting control strategy.

Authors:  Asmaa Nady Mohammed; Sahar Abdel Aleem Abdel Aziz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Emission Sources of Campylobacter from Agricultural Farms, Impact on Environmental Contamination and Intervention Strategies.

Authors:  Vanessa Szott; Anika Friese
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Antimicrobial resistance and recovery of Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Escherichia coli from chicken egg layer flocks in Canadian sentinel surveillance sites using 2 types of sample matrices.

Authors:  Agnes Agunos; Sheryl P Gow; David F Léger; Logan Flockhart; Danielle Daignault; Andrea Desruisseau; Erin Zabek; Frank Pollari; Richard J Reid-Smith
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Longitudinal Changes in Campylobacter and the Litter Microbiome throughout the Broiler Production Cycle.

Authors:  Robert Valeris-Chacin; Bonnie Weber; Timothy J Johnson; Maria Pieters; Randall S Singer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 5.005

5.  Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems.

Authors:  Nânci Santos-Ferreira; Vânia Ferreira; Paula Teixeira
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-21

6.  Prevalence, seasonality, and antimicrobial resistance of thermotolerant Campylobacter isolated from broiler farms and slaughterhouses in East Algeria.

Authors:  Mohamed Baali; Mohamed Lounis; Hanan Laidouci Al Amir; Ammar Ayachi; Ahcen Hakem; Ahmed Kassah-Laouar
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-06-28

Review 7.  Campylobacter and Arcobacter species in food-producing animals: prevalence at primary production and during slaughter.

Authors:  Nompumelelo Shange; Pieter Gouws; Louwrens C Hoffman
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Wild, insectivorous bats might be carriers of Campylobacter spp.

Authors:  Wilma C Hazeleger; Wilma F Jacobs-Reitsma; Peter H C Lina; Albert G de Boer; Thijs Bosch; Angela H A M van Hoek; Rijkelt R Beumer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Antimicrobial resistance in the globalized food chain: a One Health perspective applied to the poultry industry.

Authors:  Celso José Bruno de Oliveira; Wondwossen Abebe Gebreyes; Mauro de Mesquita Souza Saraiva; Kelvin Lim; Daniel Farias Marinho do Monte; Patrícia Emília Naves Givisiez; Lucas Bocchini Rodrigues Alves; Oliveiro Caetano de Freitas Neto; Samuel Kariuki; Angelo Berchieri Júnior
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 2.476

10.  Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. in poultry feces and carcasses in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Assèta Kagambèga; Alexandre Thibodeau; Valentina Trinetta; Daniel K Soro; Florent N Sama; Évariste Bako; Caroline S Bouda; Aïssata Wereme N'Diaye; Philippe Fravalo; Nicolas Barro
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.863

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.