Literature DB >> 29214581

Newborn Screening: Beyond the Spot.

Tiina K Urv1, Melissa A Parisi2.   

Abstract

The newborn screening paradigm of testing all newborns in the United States for treatable conditions within the first few hours of birth has proven to be a remarkable success story in the realm of public health by reducing neonatal and childhood morbidity and mortality. The Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act of 2007 and its successor, the Reauthorization Act of 2014, legislated the establishment of a Department of Health and Human Services Advisory Committee to make recommendations around newborn screening and a methodology to establish and add new conditions to a Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) which currently includes 34 core conditions. In spite of the absence of a federal mandate that requires each of the states in the U.S. to screen for the disorders on the RUSP, most state public health laboratories have adopted the conditions on this panel. Moreover, the evolution of the evidence-based review process for adding new conditions to the RUSP has led to improvements in incorporating the public health impact and feasibility and implementation considerations. The cooperation between the federal partners who support implementation and rollout of state-based screening programs, develop technical standards and proficiency materials for laboratories, review and approve new technology platforms, and promote research to develop new assays and treatments for screenable disorders, points to the success of the newborn screening enterprise nationwide. As new technologic advances are made in the realm of genomic sequencing, the potential for incorporating these technologies holds great promise for newborn screening, but the ethical ramifications must be carefully considered to avoid harming the existing trust in the program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early diagnosis; Newborn screening; Rare disease

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29214581     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  6 in total

1.  Targeted next generation sequencing for newborn screening of Menkes disease.

Authors:  Richard B Parad; Stephen G Kaler; Evan Mauceli; Tanya Sokolsky; Ling Yi; Arindam Bhattacharjee
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab Rep       Date:  2020-07-21

2.  Survey of quality of life, phenotypic expression, and response to treatment in Krabbe leukodystrophy.

Authors:  Thomas J Langan; Amy Barczykowski; Kabir Jalal; Laura Sherwood; Heather Allewelt; Joanne Kurtzberg; Randy L Carter
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2019-04-11

3.  Spectrum of Genetic Diseases in Tunisia: Current Situation and Main Milestones Achieved.

Authors:  Nessrine Mezzi; Olfa Messaoud; Rahma Mkaouar; Nadia Zitouna; Safa Romdhane; Ghaith Abdessalem; Cherine Charfeddine; Faouzi Maazoul; Ines Ouerteni; Yosr Hamdi; Anissa Zaouak; Ridha Mrad; Sonia Abdelhak; Lilia Romdhane
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Application of a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel in newborn screening efficiently identifies inborn disorders of neonates.

Authors:  Xinwen Huang; Dingwen Wu; Lin Zhu; Wenjun Wang; Rulai Yang; Jianbin Yang; Qunyan He; Bingquan Zhu; Ying You; Rui Xiao; Zhengyan Zhao
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.123

5.  Combining newborn metabolic and DNA analysis for second-tier testing of methylmalonic acidemia.

Authors:  Gang Peng; Peidong Shen; Neeru Gandotra; Anthony Le; Eula Fung; Laura Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Ronald W Davis; Gregory M Enns; Hongyu Zhao; Tina M Cowan; Curt Scharfe
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Inequities in newborn screening: Race and the role of medicaid.

Authors:  Heeju Sohn; Stefan Timmermans
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2019-10-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.