Literature DB >> 29214578

Cost-Effectiveness Methods and Newborn Screening Assessment.

I Castilla-Rodríguez1,2,3, L Vallejo-Torres4,5,6, M L Couce7,8, C Valcárcel-Nazco6, J Mar4,9, P Serrano-Aguilar4,10,11.   

Abstract

Nowadays, health funding decisions must be supported by sound arguments in terms of both effectiveness and economic criteria. After more than half a century of newborn screening for rare diseases, the appropriate economic evaluation framework for these interventions is still challenging. The validity of standard methods for economic evaluation heavily relies on the availability of robust evidence, but collection of such evidence is precluded by the rareness of the conditions that may benefit from screening. Furthermore, there are a series of conceptual and methodological limitations that warrant further careful consideration when assessing the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening programs. In this chapter we provide a general overview of current economic evaluation methods and the challenges for their application to newborn screening programs.

Keywords:  Newborn screening; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Cost-utility analysis; Economic evaluation; Biotinidase deficiency; Quality-adjusted life years

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29214578     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  2 in total

1.  Genotypic and phenotypic correlations of biotinidase deficiency in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Rai-Hseng Hsu; Yin-Hsiu Chien; Wuh-Liang Hwu; I-Fan Chang; Hui-Chen Ho; Shi-Ping Chou; Tzu-Ming Huang; Ni-Chung Lee
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 2.  Population-based screening of newborns: Findings from the newborn screening expansion study (part two).

Authors:  Kee Chan; Amy Brower; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.772

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.