Literature DB >> 29214575

Health Technology Assessment and Appraisal of Therapies for Rare Diseases.

Georgi Iskrov1,2, Tsonka Miteva-Katrandzhieva3,4, Rumen Stefanov3,4.   

Abstract

Innovative rare disease therapies and health technology assessment (HTA) share a lot of similarities. Both represent cases of interaction of epidemiology and health economics. Both are relatively new topics in public health practice. And both pose a lot of challenges to rare disease stakeholders who are currently looking for tools to support the timely access to innovative treatments while putting budget spending in order. This is why optimisation of assessment and appraisal of new rare disease therapies is a fundamental issue in rare disease health policy. Rare disease patients and caregivers expect prolonged life expectancy and improved quality of life and they perceive innovative health technologies as a rightful way to achieve these objectives.Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) provides a structured, transparent approach to identify preferred alternatives by means of combined calculation of relative importance of different criteria and performance of the alternatives on these criteria. The labyrinth of competing interests and numerous stakeholders involved is why innovative rare disease health technologies make an excellent case study of the integration between HTA and MCDA. This kind of formalisation of decision-making is perceived as fair and legitimate, leading to a balance and agreement. MCDA provides a stage for a debate of policy priorities, health system specifics and societal attitudes, while also addressing the impact of rarity on all criteria and considerations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appraisal; Budget impact; Cost-effectiveness; Health technology assessment; Innovative therapies; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Reimbursement decision-making

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29214575     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  4 in total

Review 1.  How to Value Orphan Drugs? A Review of European Value Assessment Frameworks.

Authors:  Alessandra Blonda; Yvonne Denier; Isabelle Huys; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 2.  Assessing the Value of Nusinersen for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Comparative Analysis of Reimbursement Submission and Appraisal in European Countries.

Authors:  Alessandra Blonda; Teresa Barcina Lacosta; Mondher Toumi; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  How Can We Optimize the Value Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs for Reimbursement Purposes? A Qualitative Interview Study Across European Countries.

Authors:  Alessandra Blonda; Yvonne Denier; Isabelle Huys; Pawel Kawalec; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.988

4.  Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries.

Authors:  Maria Dimitrova; Ivett Jakab; Zornitsa Mitkova; Maria Kamusheva; Konstantin Tachkov; Bertalan Nemeth; Antal Zemplenyi; Dalia Dawoud; Diana M J Delnoij; François Houýez; Zoltan Kalo
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.