Literature DB >> 29214562

Use of quantitative SPECT/CT reconstruction in 99mTc-sestamibi imaging of patients with renal masses.

Krystyna M Jones1, Lilja B Solnes1, Steven P Rowe1,2, Michael A Gorin1,2, Sara Sheikhbahaei1, George Fung1, Eric C Frey1, Mohamad E Allaf2, Yong Du1, Mehrbod S Javadi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Technetium-99m (99mTc)-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) has previously been shown to allow for the accurate differentiation of benign renal oncocytomas and hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumors (HOCTs) apart from other malignant renal tumor histologies, with oncocytomas/HOCTs showing high uptake and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) showing low uptake based on uptake ratios from non-quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) reconstructions. However, in this study, several tumors fell close to the uptake ratio cutoff, likely due to limitations in conventional SPECT/CT reconstruction methods. We hypothesized that application of quantitative SPECT/CT (QSPECT) reconstruction methods developed by our group would provide more robust separation of hot and cold lesions, serving as an imaging framework on which quantitative biomarkers can be validated for evaluation of renal masses with 99mTc-sestamibi.
METHODS: Single-photon emission computed tomography data were reconstructed using the clinical Flash 3D reconstruction and QSPECT methods. Two blinded readers then characterized each tumor as hot or cold. Semi-quantitative uptake ratios were calculated by dividing lesion activity by background renal activity for both Flash 3D and QSPECT reconstructions.
RESULTS: The difference between median (mean) hot and cold tumor uptake ratios measured 0.655 (0.73) with the QSPECT method and 0.624 (0.67) with the conventional method, resulting in increased separation between hot and cold tumors. Sub-analysis of 7 lesions near the separation point showed a higher absolute difference (0.16) between QPSECT and Flash 3D mean uptake ratios compared to the remaining lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Our finding of improved separation between uptake ratios of hot and cold lesions using QSPECT reconstruction lays the foundation for additional quantitative SPECT techniques such as SPECT-UV in the setting of renal 99mTc-sestamibi and other SPECT/CT exams. With robust quantitative image reconstruction and biomarker analysis, there may be an expanded role for SPECT/CT imaging in renal masses and other pathologic conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oncocytoma; Quantitative; RCC; SPECT; Sestamibi

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29214562     DOI: 10.1007/s12149-017-1222-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  5 in total

Review 1.  An overview of non-invasive imaging modalities for diagnosis of solid and cystic renal lesions.

Authors:  Ravinder Kaur; Mamta Juneja; A K Mandal
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of small renal masses - Full-text.

Authors:  Patrick O Richard; Philippe D Violette; Bimal Bhindi; Rodney H Breau; Wassim Kassouf; Luke T Lavallée; Michael Jewett; John R Kachura; Anil Kapoor; Maxine Noel-Lamy; Michael Ordon; Stephen E Pautler; Frédéric Pouliot; Alan I So; Ricardo A Rendon; Simon Tanguay; Christine Collins; Maryam Kandi; Bobby Shayegan; Andrew Weller; Antonio Finelli; Andrea Kokorovic; Jay Nayak
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  A review of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for renal oncocytomas: A modified diagnostic algorithm.

Authors:  Mitchell P Wilson; Prayash Katlariwala; Jonathan Abele; Gavin Low
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2022-05

Review 4.  Current Management of Small Renal Masses, Including Patient Selection, Renal Tumor Biopsy, Active Surveillance, and Thermal Ablation.

Authors:  Alejandro Sanchez; Adam S Feldman; A Ari Hakimi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Diagnostic Imaging for Solid Renal Tumors: A Pictorial Review.

Authors:  Tim J van Oostenbrugge; Jurgen J Fütterer; Peter F A Mulders
Journal:  Kidney Cancer       Date:  2018-08-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.