Literature DB >> 29214197

Genotoxicity assessment data for exfoliated buccal cells exposed to mobile phone radiation.

F M de Oliveira1, A M Carmona1, C Ladeira1.   

Abstract

Healthy mobile phone users aged 18-30 y.o. provided exfoliated buccal cells samples from the right and left inner cheeks. A total of 2000 cells per subject were screened for the presence of micronuclei as a sign of genotoxic damage, according to the mobile phone use profile of each user.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electromagnetic fields; Exfoliated buccal cells; Feulgen stain; Genotoxicity; Micronuclei; Mobile phones

Year:  2017        PMID: 29214197      PMCID: PMC5712057          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.09.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data Data was collected from members of an important share of mobile phone users (young adults, aged 18–30). Establishing the effects of mobile phone use in this population can contribute to an overall perception of how such devices affect the majority of its users [1]. Improved perception of the effects of mobile phone electromagnetic radiation in humans can contribute to improved safety guidelines for the use of this device and help combat long standing misconceptions on mobile phone radiation [2], [3], [4], [5]. Establishing the relevance and efficacy of exposure levels and of the biomarker assessment method herein described can help in the determination of a genotoxicity-based model of observation and thus promote the development of new methods.

Data

Overall micronucleus frequency in the study population (2.02 (±1.65) per 2000 cells) was found to be within currently accepted physiological ranges [6]. Lifestyle factors assessed in subjects were not shown to affect the frequency of this genotoxicity biomarker, with the exception of occupational exposure to known genotoxic agents (Fig. 1). Daily duration, side of use and history of mobile phone in years (Fig. 2) did not correlate to higher micronucleus frequencies.
Fig. 1

Density plot of micronuclei frequency in subjects exposed and non-exposed to known genotoxic agents.

Fig. 2

Micronuclei frequency distribution by history of mobile phone use in years.

Density plot of micronuclei frequency in subjects exposed and non-exposed to known genotoxic agents. Micronuclei frequency distribution by history of mobile phone use in years.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Buccal exfoliated cells were collected using sterile endobrushes followed by a smearing technique on histological slides. Cells were fixated with an ethanol-based solution, air-dried and stained according to Feulgen's method [7]. Mounted slides were screened by a singleobserver at a 1000x magnification with immersion oil and morphological objects within accepted intervals for micronuclei were counted in the first valid 2000 cells observed [8], [9], [10]. A spreadsheet containing subject characteristics and micronuclei frequencies was used as database for statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon and the Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric tests [11], [12], [13].
Subject areaPhysics, Biology
More specific subject areaRadiation genotoxicity
Type of dataText file, graphs
How data was acquiredLeica DM500 Microscope, survey
Data formatAnalyzed
Experimental factorsHistochemical stain with Feulgen's method
Experimental featuresMicroscope screening at 1000x with immersion oil
Data source locationLisbon Metropolitan Area, Portugal, 38.7223 ° N, 9.1393 ° W
Data accessibilityData are within this article.
Related research articleGenotoxicity assessment of mobile phone radiation in exfoliated buccal cells (in press)
  9 in total

1.  Effect of mobile phones on micronucleus frequency in human exfoliated oral mucosal cells.

Authors:  I Ros-Llor; M Sanchez-Siles; F Camacho-Alonso; P Lopez-Jornet
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 3.511

2.  Assessment of micronucleus frequency in normal oral mucosa of patients exposed to carcinogens.

Authors:  Paula Luce Bohrer; Manoel Sant'Ana Filho; Ricardo Losekan Paiva; Isabel Lauxen da Silva; Pantelis Varvaki Rados
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.319

3.  Buccal micronucleus cytome assay.

Authors:  Philip Thomas; Nina Holland; Claudia Bolognesi; Micheline Kirsch-Volders; Stefano Bonassi; Errol Zeiger; Siegfried Knasmueller; Michael Fenech
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  The HUMNxl scoring criteria for different cell types and nuclear anomalies in the buccal micronucleus cytome assay - an update and expanded photogallery.

Authors:  Claudia Bolognesi; Siegfried Knasmueller; Armen Nersesyan; Philip Thomas; Michael Fenech
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Has the incidence of brain cancer risen in Australia since the introduction of mobile phones 29 years ago?

Authors:  Simon Chapman; Lamiae Azizi; Qingwei Luo; Freddy Sitas
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  The HUman MicroNucleus project on eXfoLiated buccal cells (HUMN(XL)): the role of life-style, host factors, occupational exposures, health status, and assay protocol.

Authors:  Stefano Bonassi; Erdem Coskun; Marcello Ceppi; Cecilia Lando; Claudia Bolognesi; Sema Burgaz; Nina Holland; Micheline Kirsh-Volders; Siegfried Knasmueller; Errol Zeiger; Deyanira Carnesoltas; Delia Cavallo; Juliana da Silva; Vanessa M de Andrade; Gonca Cakmak Demircigil; Aníbal Domínguez Odio; Hamiyet Donmez-Altuntas; Gilka Gattas; Ashok Giri; Sarbani Giri; Belinda Gómez-Meda; Sandra Gómez-Arroyo; Valeria Hadjidekova; Anja Haveric; Mala Kamboj; Kemajl Kurteshi; Maria Grazia Martino-Roth; Regina Montero Montoya; Armen Nersesyan; Susana Pastor-Benito; Daisy Maria Favero Salvadori; Alina Shaposhnikova; Helga Stopper; Philip Thomas; Olivia Torres-Bugarín; Abhay Singh Yadav; Guillermo Zúñiga González; Michael Fenech
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  [Micronuclei research the esophageal mucosa and its relationship with risk factors with cancer of the esophagus].

Authors:  J Dietz; A S Diehl; J C Prolla; C D Furtado; A D Furtado
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.209

8.  HUMN project: detailed description of the scoring criteria for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay using isolated human lymphocyte cultures.

Authors:  M Fenech; W P Chang; M Kirsch-Volders; N Holland; S Bonassi; E Zeiger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-01-10       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 9.  Epidemiology of health effects of radiofrequency exposure.

Authors:  Anders Ahlbom; Adele Green; Leeka Kheifets; David Savitz; Anthony Swerdlow
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Micronucleus Assay in Cell Phone Users: Importance of Oral Mucosa Screening.

Authors:  Melika Ghandehari; Donia Sadri; Sareh Farhadi
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2021-09-29

2.  Statistical data analysis of cancer incidences in insurgency affected states in Nigeria.

Authors:  Patience I Adamu; Pelumi E Oguntunde; Hilary I Okagbue; Olasunmbo O Agboola
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-05-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.