| Literature DB >> 29214082 |
Setri Fugar1, Lydia Issac1, Alexis Kofi Okoh2, Christelle Chedrawy3, Nadia El Hangouche4, Neha Yadav4.
Abstract
Congenital absence of the left circumflex artery is a rare coronary anomaly with few reported cases in the literature. These patients are usually diagnosed incidentally when they undergo coronary angiography or coronary CT to rule out underlying coronary artery disease. In this article, we report a case of a 46-year-old man who was incidentally found to have a congenitally absent left circumflex artery with a superdominant right coronary artery after a workup was initiated for frequent premature ventricular contractions and regional wall motion on echocardiogram. A review of the clinical presentation, symptoms, and diagnostic modalities used to diagnose this entity is presented.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29214082 PMCID: PMC5682911 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6579847
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Cardiol ISSN: 2090-6404
Figure 1PRISMA flowchart: data collection and selection of cases.
Figure 2Coronary angiogram: (a) LAO-CAU view of superdominant RCA, (b) aortic root shot to rule out anomalous origin of the LCX, and (c) RAO caudal view showing absent left circumflex in the AV groove.
Figure 3Coronary CT views: (a) left ventricle being supplied by branches of the RCA, (b) LAD in the interventricular groove, and (c) absent left circumflex artery.
Cases of patients presenting with congenitally absent left circumflex artery.
| Ref | Age | sex | Comorbidities | Chest pain | Diagnostic procedure | MI | Echo/nuclear | Associated anomalies of other vessels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ali et al. [ | 40 | M | DM, HTN, smoking | Exertional pain CP | CATH | Yes | Reduced LV function, with inferior and posterior segments were akinetic, anterior, lateral, and septal segments hypokinesis | Large RCA (70% stenosis) and complete occlusion of LAD → CABG, super dominant RCA |
|
| ||||||||
| Ali et al. [ | 39 | M | None | Exertional pain CP | CATH | No | NA | Superdominant RCA |
|
| ||||||||
| Varela et al. [ | 55 | F | None | Nonexertional CP | CATH | No | NA | Superdominant RCA |
|
| ||||||||
| Oliveira et al. [ | 70 | M | Aortic stenosis | Exertional chest pain, syncope | CATH | No | HFPEF 58%, severe AS area < 0.7 | Superdominant RCA, anomalous origin of left coronary artery from right coronary sinus |
|
| ||||||||
| Duan et al. [ | 66 | M | Constrictive pericarditis | None | CATH (Pre-op evaluation | No | NA | Superdominant RCA and enlarged LAD branches |
|
| ||||||||
| Guo and Xu [ | 52 | M | HTN, smoking | Nonexertional CP | CATH + CT | Yes | Echo showed severe hypokinesis of the lateral wall, inferior left ventricular wall thinning and akinesis | Superdominant RCA + RCA thrombus, mid portion of LAD stenosis |
|
| ||||||||
| Quijada-Fumero et al. [ | 51 | M | DM, HTN, obesity | None (T wave inversions in V3-v6) | CATH | No | Normal LV, no RWMA | Normal LAD, absent LCX, superdominant RCA |
|
| ||||||||
| Lin et al. [ | 44 | F | None | Exertional CP | CATH | No | Thallium perfusion showed perfusion defects in the septal and inferior walls which normalized in the delayed imaging | Superdominant RCA coronary angiogram |
|
| ||||||||
| Teunissen et al. [ | 46 | M | None | Exertional CP | CATH | No | Normal LV, no RWMA | Mid segment of LAD was atretic originating from left sinus Valsalva, superdominant right coronary artery |
|
| ||||||||
| Vijayvergiya and Jaswal [ | 40 | M | None | Nonexertional CP | CATH | No | Normal LV, no RWMA | Superdominant RCA, LAD originated from the right coronary cusps |
|
| ||||||||
| Hongsakul and Suwannanon [ | 52 | M | HTN, smoking | Exertional CP | CT | Stress test, inconclusive | Superdominant RCA | |
|
| ||||||||
| Majid et al. [ | 55 | F | HTN | Nonexertional CP | CT | No | NA | Superdominant RCA |
|
| ||||||||
| Hong et al. [ | 68 | M | HLD | Nonexertional CP | CATH then CT | Yes | NA | Superdominant RCA, with acute thrombosis of RCA |
|
| ||||||||
| Bildirici et al. [ | 67 | F | HTN | Exertional CP | CATH, Confirmed with aortography | No | Normal EF (NRWMA) | Dual LAD, superdominant RCA |
|
| ||||||||
| Yoon et al. [ | 48 | M | HTN, chronic alcoholism | Nonexertional CP | CATH | No | LVH with no other abnormality | Superdominant RCA |
|
| ||||||||
| Baskurt et al. [ | 55 | F | None | Nonexertional CP | CATH, Confirmed with aortography and MDCT (multidetector row Computed tomography) | No | Normal LV, no RWMA | Superdominant RCA |
|
| ||||||||
| Sato et al. [ | 62 | M | CAD | Exertional CP | Coronary CT/CATH | No | NA | Superdominant RCA |
|
| ||||||||
| Harada et al. [ | 65 | F | Aortic stenosis | None | CT coronary (Pre-op) | No | NA | Absence of left circumflex and left subclavian |
|
| ||||||||
| Doven et al. [ | 67 | M | HTN, HLD, smoking | Exertional CP | CATH | No | Normal EF, no RWMA | Superdominant RCA |
|
| ||||||||
| Harada et al. [ | 49 | M | HTN, HLD | Exertional CP | CATH | Yes | NA | Complete Left main occlusion, absent LCX → treated with PCI |
|
| ||||||||
| Our case | 46 | M | None | None (frequent PVCs and abnormal Echo findings) | CATH | No | Echo-EF of 40–45%, with mild diffuse hypokinesis with RWMA and akinesis in the basal-mid inferior walls | Superdominant RCA |
CATH: coronary angiogram, EF: left ventricular ejection fraction, F: female, HTN: hypertension, LAD: left anterior descending artery, LCX: left circumflex artery, HTN: hypertension, M: male, NA: not available, RCA, right coronary artery, RWMA, regional wall motion abnormalities, STEMI: ST segment elevation MI, and CP: chest pain.