Literature DB >> 29213355

Draft genome sequence of Venturia carpophila, the causal agent of peach scab.

Chunxian Chen1, Clive H Bock1, Bruce W Wood1.   

Abstract

Venturia carpophila causes peach scab, a disease that renders peach (Prunus persica) fruit unmarketable. We report a high-quality draft genome sequence (36.9 Mb) of V. carpophila from an isolate collected from a peach tree in central Georgia in the United States. The genome annotation is described and a phylogenetic analysis of the pathogen is presented. The genome sequence will be a useful resource for various studies on the pathogen, including the biology and ecology, taxonomy and phylogeny, host interaction and coevolution, isolation and characterization of genes of interest, and development of molecular markers for genotyping and mapping.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cladosporium carpophilum; Fungal pathogen; Fusicladosporium carpophilum; Prunus persica; Venturiacae

Year:  2017        PMID: 29213355      PMCID: PMC5712196          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-017-0280-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

E.E. Fisher (syn. Partridge and Morgan Jones; carpophilum Thüm.; Megacladosporium carpophilum Thüm.(Vienn.-Bourg); carpophilum Thüm (Oudem.); americanum H.C. Greene) is an important fungal pathogen in the family Venturiaceae and is the causal agent of scab in peach () and other species of [1]. Typical symptoms on fruit are black freckles, spots, and/or scabs of variable size, distribution and density (Fig. 1 a and b) that render the fruit unfit for market [2]. The pathogen also infects shoots and overwinters in lesions on 1-year-old twigs, which are thought to be the source of primary inoculum in the form of conidia that are both airborne and splashborne, resulting in infection of young fruit during the spring and early summer [3]. Peach scab generally develops on the most exposed, easily wetted, uppermost portion of the fruit surface, which is consistent with the splash-borne nature of conidia [4]. Multiple fungicide sprays are required to control peach scab at variable costs, which impose a risk of the pathogen developing resistance to certain fungicides. The effect of the fungicide sprays in reducing disease severity and thus improving fruit quality has been demonstrated, but under certain conditions the results are inconsistent [5].
Fig. 1

Scab symptoms caused by Venturia carpophila on a immature peach fruit, b a ripe peach fruit, c conidia of V. carpophila (400×), and d an 8-week old colony of V. carpophila growing on potato dextrose agar

Scab symptoms caused by Venturia carpophila on a immature peach fruit, b a ripe peach fruit, c conidia of V. carpophila (400×), and d an 8-week old colony of V. carpophila growing on potato dextrose agar Besides peach, several economically important stone fruit crops, including apricot (P. armeniaca), almond (P. dulcis), and plum (P. domestica), can be infected by [1]. Only recently has the taxonomic identity of the pathogens causing scab on stone fruit and other related genera begun to be clarified [6-8]. No complete genome sequence of has been reported, although some related species have now been sequenced [9-11]. As with these other species, an annotated genome of is a valuable resource for various genomic, genetic, and systematic studies. For example, various genes of interest and importance, such as those related to fungicide resistance, host recognition, or mating type, can be identified for further research to aid in management of the disease. Microsatellites can be developed as informative markers for genetic mapping and diversity studies. Also, the knowledge obtained from the genome can be useful in improving development of resistant cultivars. In this report, we describe the first high-quality draft genome sequence of and provide a phylogenetic analysis of the fungus and other closely related species. The genome sequence will facilitate further genomic and phylogenetic exploration to understand the pathogen and its relationship with peach.

Organism information

Classification and features

The sequenced strain of was isolated from a scab-infected peach fruit (cv. Julyprince) from an 8-year-old tree in June 2014 at the USDA-ARS-SEFTNRL, Byron, Georgia, USA (Table 1). Asexually produced conidia (Fig. 1c) of V. carpophila were scraped from a single lesion on the fruit surface using a scalpel, and a dilute spore solution prepared in sterile distilled water. Multiple 0.1 μL aliquots were spread on the surface of replicate water agar plates, amended with lactic acid (0.50 mL/L), streptomycin (0.20 g/L), tetracycline (0.05 g/L) and chloramphenicol (0.05 g/L). Plates were incubated at 27 °C for 48 h under fluorescent light on a 12/12 h day/night cycle. A single germinated spore of was excised on an agar plug using a scalpel under a microscope (50×), and was transferred to antibiotic-amended potato dextrose agar, and was grown for 4 weeks under the same conditions described above (Fig. 1d).
Table 1

Classification and general features of Venturia carpophila

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence code a
ClassificationDomain Fungi TAS [35]
Phylum Ascomycota TAS [35]
Class Dothidiomycetes TAS [36]
Order Pleosporales TAS [37]
Family Venturiaceae TAS [37]
Genus Venturia TAS [38]
Species Venturia carpophila TAS [1]
Strain JB3–5NAS
Gram stainN/ANAS
Cell shapeNot reportedNAS
MotilityNot reportedNAS
SporulationConidia and ascosporesTAS [1, 2]
Temperature rangeMesophilic (15–25 °C)TAS [39]
Optimum temperatureNot reportedNAS
pH range; OptimumNot reportedNAS
Carbon sourceNot reportedNAS
DispersalRain splash and windTAS [3, 39]
InfectionSurface wetnessTAS [3]
MIGS-6HabitatArborealTAS [2]
MIGS-6.3SalinityNot reportedNAS
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementAerobicNAS
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipParasiteTAS [2]
MIGS-14PathogenicityPathogenicTAS [2]
MIGS-4Geographic locationByron, Georgia, USANAS
MIGS-5Time of sample collectionJuly 2010NAS
MIGS-4.1Latitude32.652o NNAS
MIGS-4.2Longitude83.739 o WNAS
MIGS-4.4Altitude156 mNAS

a Evidence codes – IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes as for the Gene Ontology project [40]

Classification and general features of Venturia carpophila a Evidence codes – IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes as for the Gene Ontology project [40] The fungus belongs in the Eukaryota, is a member of the Fungal kingdom, phylum Ascomycota, class Dothidiomycetes, and family Venturiaceae (Table 1). Several other economically important plant pathogens are members of the Dothidiomycetes, including apple scab (), pear scab (), pecan scab (), rice scald (Magnaprthe oryzae), and Septoria leaf blotch of wheat ( syn. graminicola). has been classified based on its host range, morphology and some molecular characteristics [1]. The sexual stage (pseudothecia that produce ascospores) of the fungus has been identified and described from Australia [1], but has not been described elsewhere at any time. Its role in the epidemiology of the disease is unknown. The phylogenetic relationship of to other Ascomycota species based on the 18S rRNA genes shows that it is most closely related to members of the family Venturiaceae, particularly the genera and Venturia (Fig. 2). The 18S rRNA gene was located on scaffold_438 and a 1552 bp sequence aligned with the sequences from the other fungi was used for the analysis. The phylogenetic analysis was performed using the nearest neighbor joining method in CLUSTALX2 [12] with node values based on 1000 replicates. The phylogenetic tree was drawn by TreeView [13]. Members from other genera in the Dothidiomycetes were included as outgroups.
Fig. 2

The phylogenetic position of Venturia carpophila in comparison with other related fungal species. The tree was developed based on the 18S rRNA gene of the sequenced isolate of V. carpophila, an accession of the 18S rRNA gene of another isolate of V. carpophila, and accessions of other closely-related members of the family Venturiaceae (genera Fusicladium and Venturia) and with outgroup representatives (Phyllosticta harai, Staniwardia suttonii, Mycosphaerella graminicola, M. verrucosiafricana, Xenomeris raetica and Gibberella moniliformis, all in the class Dothidiomyectes of the phylum Ascomycota). The nearest neighbor joining tree was built by CLUSTALX2 [12] and drawn to scale by TreeView [13] based on 18S rRNA sequence phylogenetic analysis involved in a 1000-replicate bootstrapping process (numbers adjacent to branches are support values from 1000 bootstraps). The branch lengths in the tree were measured as substitutions per site, i.e., 0.1 on the scale bar representing 4 substitutions in 100 bp. The evolutionary history was inferred from 1522 aligned characters. The GenBank accession numbers for each species or strain are shown in parenthesis

The phylogenetic position of Venturia carpophila in comparison with other related fungal species. The tree was developed based on the 18S rRNA gene of the sequenced isolate of V. carpophila, an accession of the 18S rRNA gene of another isolate of V. carpophila, and accessions of other closely-related members of the family Venturiaceae (genera Fusicladium and Venturia) and with outgroup representatives (Phyllosticta harai, Staniwardia suttonii, Mycosphaerella graminicola, M. verrucosiafricana, Xenomeris raetica and Gibberella moniliformis, all in the class Dothidiomyectes of the phylum Ascomycota). The nearest neighbor joining tree was built by CLUSTALX2 [12] and drawn to scale by TreeView [13] based on 18S rRNA sequence phylogenetic analysis involved in a 1000-replicate bootstrapping process (numbers adjacent to branches are support values from 1000 bootstraps). The branch lengths in the tree were measured as substitutions per site, i.e., 0.1 on the scale bar representing 4 substitutions in 100 bp. The evolutionary history was inferred from 1522 aligned characters. The GenBank accession numbers for each species or strain are shown in parenthesis

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

The genome of V. carpophila described here was sequenced in 2015 at the ICBR core facility of the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. The genome was assembled and annotated at the USDA-ARS Fruit and Tree Nut Research Laboratory. This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession MECS00000000 (Bioproject PRJNA321389). The version described in this paper is version MECS01000000. The project data is summarized in Table 2. The project information is in compliance with MIGS version 2.0 [14].
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS-31Finishing qualityHigh-quality draft
MIGS-28Libraries usedA paired-end library (average insert 518 bp for 2 × 300 cycles)
MIGS-29Sequencing platformsIllumina Miseq
MIGS-31.2Fold coverage263×
MIGS-30AssemblerA5-MiSeq
MIGS-32Gene calling methodAugustus using Saccharomyces as the species parameter, also COG and BLAST search NCBI NR (non-redundant) database
Locus TagN/A
Genbank IDMECS00000000
Genbank Date of Release2017–02-10
GOLD IDN/A
BIOPROJECTPRJNA321389
BIOSAMPLESAMN04993191
MIGS-13Source Material IdentifierN/A
Project relevanceBiotechnology/mycology/disease control
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

Culture of was on antibiotic-amended potato dextrose agar. The culture was incubated for 4 weeks at 25 °C (12 h light/12 h dark), when the DNA was extracted from the sample using a ZymoResearch DNA extraction kit (ZymoResearch, Irvine, CA), following a slightly modified protocol for DNA extraction from fungi [15]. A Qiagen Tissue Lyser (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) was used to lyse the mycelium. Once obtained, the DNA was quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Products, Wilmington, DE) and stored in TE buffer at −20 °C.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using an Illumina paired-end library (a V3 kit, 2 × 300 cycles) and a MiSeq machine, which generated 400,041,052 raw reads consisting of 12,052,356,652 raw nucleotides. The A5-Miseq assembly pipeline was used automatically to check quality, trim adaptors, filter low-quality reads, to correct sequencing errors using robust error correction (EC) parameters, and generate high-quality genome contigs with additional detection of assembly errors [16]. About 97.54% raw reads and 83.90% nucleotides passed EC; thus a total of 39,057,608 EC reads, containing 10,111,608,273 EC nucleotides, were subject to the final assembly process. A total of 657 contigs, accounting for 36,917,822 bp, were assembled, representing the assembled genome size of the pathogen. Of the assembled nucleotides, 98.58% bases had a PHRED-scale score quality > = 40 (Q40) and the average depth of each nucleotide was 263.47, indicating it is a high-quality assembly. Additionally, the longest contig is 1,454,817 bp and the N50 length is 292,586 bp, suggesting the genome was covered mostly by larger contigs. The actual genome size is unknown at this stage, but the 263 × genome coverage likely covers more than 95% of the genome. Therefore we can estimate that the genome size of is ~38.9 Mb, which is in the typical size range of genomes in the phylum Ascomycota [17].

Genome annotation

The draft genome was annotated using the MAKER pipeline [18]. In summary, repeats were first found and masked using RepeatMasker and the RepBase database [19]; ab initio gene prediction was performed with AUGUSTUS under the parameter [20]; these predicted genes were annotated by BLAST against the NCBI non-redundant (nr) nucleotide database and also by RPSBLAST (Reverse Position-Specific BLAST) batch search in conserved domain database (CDD v3.14) [21, 22]. The CCD is a superset including a total of 47,363 position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) domains curated in the NCBI and imported from Pfam [23], SMART [24], COG [25], PRK [26], and TIGRFAM [27]. The e-value for BLAST and RPSBLAST search in a database was 1e-50 and 0.01, respectively. In addition, CRISPR regions were identified using the CRISPR Recognition Tool (CRT) [28]; tRNAs were identified by tRNAScan-SE-1.23 [29]; rRNAs were identified by RNAmmer [30]; signal peptides and transmembrane helices were predicted using SignalP [31] and TMHMM [32], respectively. According to BLASTN, 107 of the 657 contigs, accounting for 144,247 bp, only had multiple hits of mitochondrial genome sequences at e-10, suggesting they belong to the organelle genome of the pathogen.

Genome properties

The properties of the V. carpophila genome are summarized in Table 3. The draft genome sequence had 36,917,822 bp in 657 contigs, with a G + C content of 47.36%. The G + C content of the 550 contigs presumable for the nuclear genome is 47.43% and that of the 107 contigs likely belonging to the mitochondrial genome is 30.13%. Of the total 8220 predicted protein-coding genes, 6547 had hits in the nr database. In addition, 4632 had predicted functions, 2694 had Pfam domains, and 3665 were assigned to COGs. The distribution of genes into COG functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Nucleotide and gene count levels of the genome

AttributeValue% of Total a
Genome size (bp)36,917,822
DNA coding (bp)10,768,75229.17
DNA G + C (bp)17,485,70947.36
DNA scaffolds657
Total genes8352
Protein coding genes822098.42
RNA genes1321.58
Pseudo genesNot reported
Genes in internal clustersNot reported
Genes with function prediction463256.35
Genes assigned to COGs113613.82
Genes with Pfam domains269432.77
Genes with signal peptides3904.74
Genes with transmembrane helices262231.90
CRISPR repeats4

a The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

CodeValue% of total a Description
J2002.43Translation
A210.26RNA processing and modification
K1361.65Transcription
L2082.53Replication, recombination and repair
B280.34Chromatin structure and dynamics
D1722.09Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y40.05Nuclear structure
V630.77Defense mechanisms
T1221.48Signal transduction mechanisms
M1421.73Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N190.23Cell motility
Z240.29Cytoskeleton
WExtracellular structures
U700.85Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O2953.59Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C2402.92Energy production and conversion
G2493.03Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E2703.28Amino acid transport and metabolism
F580.71Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1341.63Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I2172.64Lipid transport and metabolism
P1441.75Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q1171.42Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R6227.57General function prediction only
S1101.34Function unknown
455555.41Not in COGs

a The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Nucleotide and gene count levels of the genome a The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories a The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Insights from the genome sequence

The genome provides a useful resource for identifying genes of interest in . Furthermore, the phylogenetic analysis presented earlier confirms the relationship of to other members of the Venturiacae and confirms previous observations on the taxonomic relationships among these members of the Ascomycota. Based on the phylogenetic analysis using the sequence of the 18S rRNA gene (Fig. 2), V. carpophila is closely related to other scab-causing fungal pathogens of higher plants, including V. cerasi, causing scab on cherry, and also V. nashicola, cause of scab on Asian pear.

Extended insights

The genome of the peach scab fungus, V. carpophila, will be of great value to research on this organism moving forward. Apart from the opportunity it affords for more detailed analysis of individual genes relating to the secretome, we have identified several genes of interest and all microsatellites for further characterization. First, we have located the full open reading frame for one of the mating type idiomorph genes (MAT1–2) in scaffold_15 (between 199,706–200,916 bp) with two predicted introns (between 199,953–200,006 bp and between 200,318–200,365 bp), which paves the way for a better understanding of the reproduction of this fungus, particularly in the USA [1]. When fully characterized, the mating type idiomorphs provide the basis not only for a more complete understanding of the epidemiology of the pathogen, but also the potential opportunity for management of the disease through control of the sexual stage, as has been demonstrated with the closely related apple scab pathogen [33]. Secondly, we have also identified the cytochrome b gene in scaffold_347 (between 2149 and 7821 bp), which contains at least two introns. The accurate boundaries of the introns need further determination by PCR and sequencing of cDNA. This gene is particularly important in plant pathogenic fungi as it plays a critical role in resistance to the quinone outside inhibitor fungicides (also known as strobilurins). Understanding the structure of this gene will form the basis for assessing risk of resistance to the quinone outside inhibitors, as demonstrated in closely related pathogens [34]. Thirdly, we have identified a total of 4021 microsatellites in 322 of the 657 scaffolds. On average, there was about one microsatellite per 10 kb of genome. The tri-type microsatellite was the most abundant. The total length of the largest 101 scaffolds (0 to 100) is 31,436,433 bp, accounting for 85.15% of the total genome size and containing 80.10% of the microsatellites. The count and distribution of microsatellites on scaffold_0 to scaffold-100 are presented (Fig. 3 a and b). Scaffold 9 had the highest count of microsatellites (152), and it was also the longest scaffold. Microsatellites are basic to studying the genetic diversity and population structure of the pathogen, and also have potential to be used for tracking specific genes of interest.
Fig. 3

Count (a) and distribution (b) of microsatellites on scaffold_0 to scaffold_100. The total length of the 101 scaffolds (0 to 100) is 31,436,433 bp, accounting for 85.15% of the total genome size and containing 80.10% of the microsatellites. Scaffold_9 is the longest (1,454,817 bp) and has the most microsatellites (152). In b, each cross mark represents a microsatellite at the corresponding position on that scaffold

Count (a) and distribution (b) of microsatellites on scaffold_0 to scaffold_100. The total length of the 101 scaffolds (0 to 100) is 31,436,433 bp, accounting for 85.15% of the total genome size and containing 80.10% of the microsatellites. Scaffold_9 is the longest (1,454,817 bp) and has the most microsatellites (152). In b, each cross mark represents a microsatellite at the corresponding position on that scaffold

Conclusions

The predicted genes may represent most functional genes in the V. carpophila genome and can be used as a new resource for developing molecular markers for genetic diversity studies, and for other research into the biology, ecology, taxonomy and phylogeny of the pathogen, and for research into host/pathogen coevolution.
  24 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements.

Authors:  J Jurka; V V Kapitonov; A Pavlicek; P Klonowski; O Kohany; J Walichiewicz
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding.

Authors:  Mario Stanke; Mark Diekhans; Robert Baertsch; David Haussler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains.

Authors:  J Schultz; F Milpetz; P Bork; C P Ponting
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence.

Authors:  T M Lowe; S R Eddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data.

Authors:  David Coil; Guillaume Jospin; Aaron E Darling
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Characterization of Ribosomal DNA from Venturia inaequalis and Its Phylogenetic Relationship to rDNA from Other Tree-Fruit Venturia Species.

Authors:  G Schnabel; E L Schnabel; A L Jones
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  The diversity of fungal genome.

Authors:  Tapan Kumar Mohanta; Hanhong Bae
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.244

10.  CRISPR recognition tool (CRT): a tool for automatic detection of clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats.

Authors:  Charles Bland; Teresa L Ramsey; Fareedah Sabree; Micheal Lowe; Kyndall Brown; Nikos C Kyrpides; Philip Hugenholtz
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Whole Genome Enabled Phylogenetic and Secretome Analyses of Two Venturia nashicola Isolates.

Authors:  Maxim Prokchorchik; Kyungho Won; Yoonyoung Lee; Cécile Segonzac; Kee Hoon Sohn
Journal:  Plant Pathol J       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 1.795

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.