Akira Fujiyoshi1, Hisatomi Arima2, Sachiko Tanaka-Mizuno3, Takahashi Hisamatsu4, Sayaka Kadowaki1, Aya Kadota1,5, Maryam Zaid5, Akira Sekikawa6, Takashi Yamamoto7, Minoru Horie7, Katsuyuki Miura1,5, Hirotsugu Ueshima1,5. 1. Department of Public Health, Shiga University of Medical Science. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Fukuoka University. 3. Department of Medical Statistic, Shiga University of Medical Science. 4. Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Shimane University. 5. Center for Epidemiologic Research in Asia, Shiga University of Medical Science. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh. 7. Department of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science.
Abstract
AIM: The clinical significance of coronary artery calcification (CAC) is not fully determined in general East Asian populations where background coronary heart disease (CHD) is less common than in USA/Western countries. We cross-sectionally assessed the association between CAC and estimated CHD risk as well as each major risk factor in general Japanese men. METHODS:Participants were 996 randomly selected Japanese men aged 40-79 y, free of stroke, myocardial infarction, or revascularization. We examined an independent relationship between each risk factor used in prediction models and CAC score ≥100 by logistic regression. We then divided the participants into quintiles of estimated CHD risk per prediction model to calculate odds ratio of having CAC score ≥100. Receiver operating characteristic curve and c-index were used to examine discriminative ability of prevalent CAC for each prediction model. RESULTS:Age, smoking status, and systolic blood pressure were significantly associated with CAC score ≥100 in the multivariable analysis. The odds of having CAC score ≥100 were higher for those in higher quintiles in all prediction models (p-values for trend across quintiles ＜0.0001 for all models). All prediction models showed fair and similar discriminative abilities to detect CAC score ≥100, with similar c-statistics (around 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: In a community-based sample of Japanese men free of CHD and stroke, CAC score ≥100 was significantly associated with higher estimated CHD risk by prediction models. This finding supports the potential utility of CAC as a biomarker for CHD in a general Japanese male population.
RCT Entities:
AIM: The clinical significance of coronary artery calcification (CAC) is not fully determined in general East Asian populations where background coronary heart disease (CHD) is less common than in USA/Western countries. We cross-sectionally assessed the association between CAC and estimated CHD risk as well as each major risk factor in general Japanese men. METHODS:Participants were 996 randomly selected Japanese men aged 40-79 y, free of stroke, myocardial infarction, or revascularization. We examined an independent relationship between each risk factor used in prediction models and CAC score ≥100 by logistic regression. We then divided the participants into quintiles of estimated CHD risk per prediction model to calculate odds ratio of having CAC score ≥100. Receiver operating characteristic curve and c-index were used to examine discriminative ability of prevalent CAC for each prediction model. RESULTS: Age, smoking status, and systolic blood pressure were significantly associated with CAC score ≥100 in the multivariable analysis. The odds of having CAC score ≥100 were higher for those in higher quintiles in all prediction models (p-values for trend across quintiles ＜0.0001 for all models). All prediction models showed fair and similar discriminative abilities to detect CAC score ≥100, with similar c-statistics (around 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: In a community-based sample of Japanese men free of CHD and stroke, CAC score ≥100 was significantly associated with higher estimated CHD risk by prediction models. This finding supports the potential utility of CAC as a biomarker for CHD in a general Japanese male population.
Authors: David C Goff; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Glen Bennett; Sean Coady; Ralph B D'Agostino; Raymond Gibbons; Philip Greenland; Daniel T Lackland; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jennifer G Robinson; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Paul Sorlie; Neil J Stone; Peter W F Wilson; Harmon S Jordan; Lev Nevo; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sarah Lewington; Gary Whitlock; Robert Clarke; Paul Sherliker; Jonathan Emberson; Jim Halsey; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-12-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Song S Mao; Raveen S Pal; Charles R McKay; Yan G Gao; Ambarish Gopal; Naser Ahmadi; Janis Child; Sivi Carson; Junichiro Takasu; Behnaz Sarlak; Daniel Bechmann; Matthew Jay Budoff Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.826