Literature DB >> 29212805

When can we stop anticoagulation in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis?

Agnes Y Y Lee1.   

Abstract

The optimal duration of anticoagulation in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is unknown. Without well-designed studies evaluating the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of continuing anticoagulant therapy beyond the acute treatment period of 3 to 6 months, evidence-based recommendations are lacking. Consensus guidelines generally suggest continuing anticoagulation in patients with active cancer or receiving cancer treatment, with periodic reassessment of the risks and benefits. Unfortunately, with very little published data on the epidemiology of cancer-associated VTE beyond the initial 6 months, it is not possible for clinicians and patients to weigh risks and benefits in a quantitatively informed manner. Further research is needed to provide reliable and contemporary estimates on the risk of recurrent VTE off anticoagulation, risk of bleeding on anticoagulation, case fatality or all-cause mortality, and other important consequences of living with cancer-associated VTE. This chapter provides an overview of the published literature on real-world data on anticoagulant therapy use, the risks and risk factors of recurrent VTE and bleeding, and patient preference and values regarding long-term anticoagulation. It will conclude with a pragmatic, experience-informed approach for tailoring anticoagulant therapy in patients with cancer-associated VTE.
Copyright © 2017 American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29212805     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-05-787929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  7 in total

1.  Treatment algorithm in cancer-associated thrombosis: Canadian expert consensus.

Authors:  M Carrier; N Blais; M Crowther; P Kavan; G Le Gal; O Moodley; S Shivakumar; V Tagalakis; C Wu; A Y Y Lee
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Dong; Yi Wang; Rui-Lian Ma; Ming Liu; Jun-Zhen Gao; Wu-Yun Su; Li Yan; Jian-Jun Sun
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Risk of venous thromboembolism in men with prostate cancer compared with men in the general population: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Sweden.

Authors:  Yanina Balabanova; Bahman Farahmand; Hans Garmo; Pär Stattin; Gunnar Brobert
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 4.  Cancer and Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.

Authors:  Babak B Navi; Scott E Kasner; Mitchell S V Elkind; Mary Cushman; Oh Young Bang; Lisa M DeAngelis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Low-molecular-weight-heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in high- and low-risk patients with active cancer: a post hoc analysis of the CLOT Study.

Authors:  Seth Woodruff; Agnes Y Y Lee; Marc Carrier; Guillaume Feugère; Paula Abreu; Joseph Heissler
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Cancer-related stroke: Exploring personalized therapy strategies.

Authors:  Yu-Jie Chen; Rui-Guo Dong; Meng-Meng Zhang; Chao Sheng; Peng-Fei Guo; Jie Sun
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: Treatment and prevention with rivaroxaban.

Authors:  Rupert Bauersachs; Alok A Khorana; Agnes Y Y Lee; Gerald Soff
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-04-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.