Literature DB >> 29212400

Cervical pessaries for the prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Limei Zheng1, Jun Dong1, Yongdong Dai1, Yanling Zhang1, Libing Shi1, Minling Wei1, Xiaoying Jin1, Chao Li1, Songying Zhang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cervical pessaries for the prevention of preterm birth.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and other sources from inception to July 2016. This analysis referred to pregnant women with singleton/multiple viable fetus/fetuses, with or without cervical pessary placement.
RESULTS: Six randomized control trials and five cohort studies involving 3911 participants were included. Overall, cervical pessary placement was slightly associated with the decrease of spontaneous delivery less than 34 weeks (relative risk 0.65 [95% CI: 0.44-0.96]) and increased gestational age at delivery (weighted mean difference 1.03 weeks [95% CI: 0.37-1.70]) in multiple pregnancies, but not with poor perinatal outcomes. Pessary placement in singleton pregnancies did not show any difference. A planned subgroup analysis showed multiple pregnancies with shorter cervical length (≤25 mm) had a longer prolongation of pregnancy (weighted mean difference 2.08 weeks [95% CI: 1.35-2.82]).
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggested pessary placement could slightly reduce the rate of spontaneous preterm delivery before 34 weeks, and increase gestational age at delivery in multiple pregnancies, but not in singleton pregnancies. More studies of high quality with detailed records are urgent to confirm the efficacy of this procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pessary; meta-analysis; preterm birth

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29212400     DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1414795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  5 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: a scoping review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Fiona Campbell; Shumona Salam; Anthea Sutton; Shamanthi Maya Jayasooriya; Caroline Mitchell; Emmanuel Amabebe; Julie Balen; Bronwen M Gillespie; Kerry Parris; Priya Soma-Pillay; Lawrence Chauke; Brenda Narice; Dilichukwu O Anumba
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 10.693

Review 3.  Prediction models for the risk of spontaneous preterm birth based on maternal characteristics: a systematic review and independent external validation.

Authors:  Linda J E Meertens; Pim van Montfort; Hubertina C J Scheepers; Sander M J van Kuijk; Robert Aardenburg; Josje Langenveld; Ivo M A van Dooren; Iris M Zwaan; Marc E A Spaanderman; Luc J M Smits
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Comparison of cerclage and pessary in prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Nazanin Hajizadeh; Nasrin Saharkhiz; Sedigheh Hosseini; Behnam Arabzadeh
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2020-07-06

5.  The Arabin pessary to prevent preterm birth in women with a twin pregnancy and a short cervix: the STOPPIT 2 RCT.

Authors:  Jane E Norman; John Norrie; Graeme MacLennan; David Cooper; Sonia Whyte; Sushila Chowdhry; Sarah Cunningham-Burley; Aileen R Neilson; Xue W Mei; Joel Be Smith; Andrew Shennan; Stephen C Robson; Steven Thornton; Mark D Kilby; Neil Marlow; Sarah J Stock; Philip R Bennett; Jane Denton
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 4.014

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.