Maria Carlsen Elkjær1, Morten Heebøll Andersen2, Søren Høyer3, Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen4, Michael Borre1. 1. a Department of Urology , Aarhus University Hospital , Skejby , Denmark. 2. b Department of Urology , Regional Hospital of West Jutland , Holstebro , Denmark. 3. c Department of Pathology , Aarhus University Hospital , NBG , Denmark. 4. d Department of Radiology , Aarhus University Hospital , Skejby , Denmark.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and mpMRI guided biopsies (MRGB) for monitoring an active surveillance (AS) prostate cancer cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One year after initial diagnostic TRUS guided biopsy (TRUS-bx), baseline mpMRI, and enrolment in an AS program patients underwent a one year follow-up comprising the usual TRUS-bx and an mpMRI. Prostate MRI lesions were scored on the five-point PIRADS scale version 2. In cases without TRUS-bx progression, patients with PIRADS 4 or 5 lesions were scheduled for MRGB. Progression in TRUS-bx was defined as Gleason score (Gs) up-grades, >3 tumor positive cores or a maximal cancer core length (MCCL) > 50%. In MRGB, Gs upgrade or a MCCL ≥6 mm Gs 3 + 3 lesions were considered to reflect progression. PSA increase or progression in clinical T-classification alone was not considered clinical progression. RESULTS: 50 patients were included in the study. In total 10 (20%) patients had per definition progression at one year follow-up. Seven patients (7/50 = 14%) had clinical progression based on TRUS-bx. mpMRI identified seven newly emerged PIRADS 4 lesions. Three patients with PIRADS 4 lesions had no sign of TRUS-bx progression, while MRGB revealed significant cancer (Gs 7 (3 + 4) and Gs 8 (3 + 5)). Consequently, seven patients underwent definitive treatment. Of these, six and four had a progression on MRI and TRUS-bx, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that mpMRI is at least equal to TRUS-bx in detecting progression at one year follow-up in prostate cancer patients undergoing active surveillance.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and mpMRI guided biopsies (MRGB) for monitoring an active surveillance (AS) prostate cancer cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One year after initial diagnostic TRUS guided biopsy (TRUS-bx), baseline mpMRI, and enrolment in an AS program patients underwent a one year follow-up comprising the usual TRUS-bx and an mpMRI. Prostate MRI lesions were scored on the five-point PIRADS scale version 2. In cases without TRUS-bx progression, patients with PIRADS 4 or 5 lesions were scheduled for MRGB. Progression in TRUS-bx was defined as Gleason score (Gs) up-grades, >3 tumor positive cores or a maximal cancer core length (MCCL) > 50%. In MRGB, Gs upgrade or a MCCL ≥6 mm Gs 3 + 3 lesions were considered to reflect progression. PSA increase or progression in clinical T-classification alone was not considered clinical progression. RESULTS: 50 patients were included in the study. In total 10 (20%) patients had per definition progression at one year follow-up. Seven patients (7/50 = 14%) had clinical progression based on TRUS-bx. mpMRI identified seven newly emerged PIRADS 4 lesions. Three patients with PIRADS 4 lesions had no sign of TRUS-bx progression, while MRGB revealed significant cancer (Gs 7 (3 + 4) and Gs 8 (3 + 5)). Consequently, seven patients underwent definitive treatment. Of these, six and four had a progression on MRI and TRUS-bx, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that mpMRI is at least equal to TRUS-bx in detecting progression at one year follow-up in prostate cancerpatients undergoing active surveillance.
Entities:
Keywords:
Prostate cancer; active surveillance; follow-up; multi-parametric MRI
Authors: Kevin Michael Gallagher; Edward Christopher; Andrew James Cameron; Scott Little; Alasdair Innes; Gill Davis; Julian Keanie; Prasad Bollina; Alan McNeill Journal: BJU Int Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Jacob Fredsøe; Martin Rasmussen; Amy L Tin; Andrew J Vickers; Michael Borre; Karina D Sørensen; Hans Lilja Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-09-07 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Lars Björnebo; Henrik Olsson; Tobias Nordström; Fredrik Jäderling; Henrik Grönberg; Martin Eklund; Anna Lantz Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Jacob Fredsøe; Anne K I Rasmussen; Peter Mouritzen; Marianne T Bjerre; Peter Østergren; Mikkel Fode; Michael Borre; Karina D Sørensen Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2020-03-28