Literature DB >> 29211336

Diverse effects of invasive ecosystem engineers on marine biodiversity and ecosystem functions: A global review and meta-analysis.

Tamar Guy-Haim1,2,3, Devin A Lyons4, Jonne Kotta5, Henn Ojaveer5, Ana M Queirós6, Eva Chatzinikolaou7, Christos Arvanitidis7, Serena Como8, Paolo Magni8, Andrew J Blight9, Helen Orav-Kotta5, Paul J Somerfield6, Tasman P Crowe4, Gil Rilov1,3.   

Abstract

Invasive ecosystem engineers (IEE) are potentially one of the most influential types of biological invaders. They are expected to have extensive ecological impacts by altering the physical-chemical structure of ecosystems, thereby changing the rules of existence for a broad range of resident biota. To test the generality of this expectation, we used a global systematic review and meta-analysis to examine IEE effects on the abundance of individual species and communities, biodiversity (using several indices) and ecosystem functions, focusing on marine and estuarine environments. We found that IEE had a significant effect (positive and negative) in most studies testing impacts on individual species, but the overall (cumulative) effect size was small and negative. Many individual studies showed strong IEE effects on community abundance and diversity, but the direction of effects was variable, leading to statistically non-significant overall effects in most categories. In contrast, there was a strong overall effect on most ecosystem functions we examined. IEE negatively affected metabolic functions and primary production, but positively affected nutrient flux, sedimentation and decomposition. We use the results to develop a conceptual model by highlighting pathways whereby IEE impact communities and ecosystem functions, and identify several sources of research bias in the IEE-related invasion literature. Only a few of the studies simultaneously quantified IEE effects on community/diversity and ecosystem functions. Therefore, understanding how IEE may alter biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships should be a primary focus of future studies of invasion biology. Moreover, the clear effects of IEE on ecosystem functions detected in our study suggest that scientists and environmental managers ought to examine how the effects of IEE might be manifested in the services that marine ecosystems provide to humans.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alien; biodiversity-ecosystem functioning; biological diversity; decomposition; ecosystem engineers; invasive; nutrient flux; primary production; sedimentation; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29211336     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  7 in total

1.  Limited impact of an invasive oyster on intertidal assemblage structure and biodiversity: the importance of environmental context and functional equivalency with native species.

Authors:  Nadescha Zwerschke; Philip R Hollyman; Romy Wild; Robin Strigner; John R Turner; Jonathan W King
Journal:  Mar Biol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.573

2.  Invasive species denialism: Sorting out facts, beliefs, and definitions.

Authors:  Demetrio Boltovskoy; Francisco Sylvester; Esteban M Paolucci
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Monitoring of the invasion of Spartina alterniflora from 1985 to 2015 in Zhejiang Province, China.

Authors:  Nan Li; Longwei Li; Yinlong Zhang; Ming Wu
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.964

4.  Invasive ecosystem engineers threaten benthic nitrogen cycling by altering native infaunal and biofouling communities.

Authors:  L W Tait; A M Lohrer; M Townsend; J Atalah; O Floerl; G J Inglis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Harnessing positive species interactions as a tool against climate-driven loss of coastal biodiversity.

Authors:  Fabio Bulleri; Britas Klemens Eriksson; Ana Queirós; Laura Airoldi; Francisco Arenas; Christos Arvanitidis; Tjeerd J Bouma; Tasman P Crowe; Dominique Davoult; Katell Guizien; Ljiljana Iveša; Stuart R Jenkins; Richard Michalet; Celia Olabarria; Gabriele Procaccini; Ester A Serrão; Martin Wahl; Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Removal of an established invader can change gross primary production of native macroalgae and alter carbon flow in intertidal rock pools.

Authors:  Francesca Rossi; Rosa M Viejo; Linney Duarte; Fatima Vaz-Pinto; Ignacio Gestoso; Celia Olabarria
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A large invasive consumer reduces coastal ecosystem resilience by disabling positive species interactions.

Authors:  Marc J S Hensel; Brian R Silliman; Johan van de Koppel; Enie Hensel; Sean J Sharp; Sinead M Crotty; Jarrett E K Byrnes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.