| Literature DB >> 29211105 |
Valentina Tapia-Garay1, Daniela P Figueroa2, Ana Maldonado1, Daniel Frías-Laserre3, Christian R Gonzalez3, Alonso Parra4, Lucia Canals5, Werner Apt5, Sergio Alvarado1, Dante Cáceres1, Mauricio Canals1,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vector transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi appears to be interrupted in Chile; however, data show increasing incidence of Chagas' disease, raising concerns that there may be a reemerging problem.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29211105 PMCID: PMC5719539 DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760170172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz ISSN: 0074-0276 Impact factor: 2.743
Contribution of the bioclimatic variables to the models of Chagas' disease and Triatoma infestans distribution
| Variable | Chagas disease distribution |
|
|---|---|---|
| B14 = precipitation during the driest month | 27.6 | 29.7 |
| B5 = maximum temperature in the warmest month | 27.0 | 51.5 |
| B12 = annual precipitation | 10.8 | - |
| B4 = temperature seasonality | 8.4 | - |
| B1 = mean annual temperature | 8.0 | - |
| Total | 81.8 | 81.2 |
Fig. 1jackknife of the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) for Chagas' disease cases and for Triatoma infestans distribution models.
Fig. 2distribution maps for Triatoma infestans (left) and Chagas' disease cases (right: A). Points represents the empirical presence data (B) map of the potential distribution. From north to south, the lines show the limits of the Chilean regions: the first eight are: Arica y Parinacota, Tarapaca, Antofagasta, Atacama, Coquimbo, Valparaiso, Metropolitana, Bernardo O'Higgins, and Maule.
Fig. 3map of the distribution overlap of Chagas' disease cases and Triatoma infestans with a threshold value of 0.2 for presence. From north to south, the lines show the limits of the Chilean regions: the first eight are: Arica y Parinacota, Tarapaca, Antofagasta, Atacama, Coquimbo, Valparaiso, Metropolitana, Bernardo O'Higgins, and Maule.
Fig. 4map of the estimation of the potential distribution of Triatoma infestans under two scenarios of climactic change: (A) actual scenario (B) optimistic RCP: 2.6, and (C) pessimistic RCP: 8.5.