| Literature DB >> 29211104 |
José Rodrigues Coura1, Angela Cv Junqueira1, João Marcos Bb Ferreira2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chagas disease in the Brazilian Amazon Region was previously regarded as an enzootic disease of wild animals. More recently, in situations where humans have penetrated the wild ecotope or where triatomines and/or wild animals (marsupials) have invaded human homes resulting in disease transmission, Chagas disease has come to be regarded as an anthropozoonosis. We found that the highest incidence of infection due to Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas disease occurred among piassaba fibre gatherers and their families.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29211104 PMCID: PMC5719538 DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760170169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz ISSN: 0074-0276 Impact factor: 2.743
Mammals from Brazilian Amazon found to be infected with Trypanosoma cruzi
| Order | Species | References |
|---|---|---|
| Marsupialia (Didelphiomorphia) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Chiroptera |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Molossus ater |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Rodentia |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Edentada (Xenarthra) |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| |
| Carnivora |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Primates |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Triatomines found in the Brazilian Amazon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 1triatomine and marsupial invading human homes.
Fig. 2piassaba fibre gatherer.
Fig. 3piassaba fibre gatherers and families.
Fig. 4location of municipalities of Barcelos and Santa Isabel do Rio Negro, Amazon.
Fig. 5location some rivers of Barcelos e Santa Isabel, Amazonas.
Seropositive patients confirmed for Trypanosoma cruzi infection from 482 piassaba-fibre gatherers and families from Rio Negro, Amazon Region (2015-2016)
| No. | Sex | Age | Serology | titles | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIF | ELISA | ||||
| 1 | M | 43 | 320 | 389 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 2 | M | 28 | 640 | 2133 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 3 | M | 17 | 160 | 605 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 4 | M | 33 | 80 | 2324 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 5 | M | 53 | 640 | 2172 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 6 | F | 27 | 640 | 639 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 7 | M | 25 | 40 | 436 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 8 | M | 37 | 40 | 1966 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 9 | M | 71 | 320 | 1793 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 10 | F | 56 | 640 | 2125 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 11 | M | 68 | 80 | 1167 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 12 | M | 48 | 160 | 927 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 13 | F | 49 | 160 | 1045 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 14 | M | 80 | 320 | 1361 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 15 | M | 34 | 80 | 1265 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 16 | M | 66 | 160 | 1143 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 17 | M | 51 | 80 | 1269 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 18 | M | 45 | 80 | 1389 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 19 | M | 34 | 40 | 339 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 20 | F | 45 | 80 | 1303 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 21 | F | 59 | 160 | 1340 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 22 | M | 75 | 80 | 1130 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 23 | F | 45 | 160 | 1014 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 24 | F | 82 | 40 | 448 | IIF + ELISA positives |
| 25 | M | 39 | 40 | 1382 | IIF + ELISA positives |