| Literature DB >> 29211028 |
Tim Kolbe1,2, Arne Knauer3, Jens Rass4,5, Hyun Kyong Cho6, Sylvia Hagedorn7, Sven Einfeldt8, Michael Kneissl9,10, Markus Weyers11.
Abstract
The effects of composition and p-doping profile of the AlGaN:Mg electron blocking layer (EBL) in 310 nm ultraviolet B (UV-B) light emitting diodes (LEDs) have been investigated. The carrier injection and internal quantum efficiency of the LEDs were simulated and compared to electroluminescence measurements. The light output power depends strongly on the temporal biscyclopentadienylmagnesium (Cp 2 Mg) carrier gas flow profile during growth as well as on the aluminum profile of the AlGaN:Mg EBL. The highest emission power has been found for an EBL with the highest Cp 2 Mg carrier gas flow and a gradually decreasing aluminum content in direction to the p-side of the LED. This effect is attributed to an improved carrier injection and confinement that prevents electron leakage into the p-doped region of the LED with a simultaneously enhanced carrier injection into the active region.Entities:
Keywords: EBL; LED; MOVPE; UV; doping; electron blocking layer; heterostructure; light emitting diode; simulation; ultraviolet
Year: 2017 PMID: 29211028 PMCID: PMC5744331 DOI: 10.3390/ma10121396
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Illustration of the different EBL designs: (a) temporal CpMg carrier gas flow profiles (sample series 1) and (b) aluminum composition profiles (sample series 2). The curves in (a,b) corresponding to the same EBL design are marked by a star.
Figure 2(a) measured average emission power (at 20 mA, on-wafer) as well as simulated internal quantum efficiency (IQE) and (b) typical normalized emission spectra (at 20 mA, on-wafer) of 310 nm LEDs with different temporal CpMg carrier gas flow profiles in the EBL. Inset in (a): typical emission power vs. current characteristics of 310 nm LEDs with different temporal CpMg carrier gas flow profiles of the EBL.
Figure 3Simulated (a) hole concentration and (b) electron concentration of 310 nm LEDs with different doping profiles in the EBL (at 200 A/cm).
Figure 4(a) measured average emission power (at 20 mA, on-wafer) as well as simulated IQE and (b) typical normalized emission spectra (at 20 mA, on-wafer) of 310 nm LEDs with different profiles of the aluminum composition in the EBL. Inset in (a): typical emission power vs. current characteristics of 310 nm LEDs with these different EBL designs.
Figure 5Simulated (a) hole concentration and (b) conduction- and valence band edge of 310 nm LEDs with different EBL designs (at 200 A/cm).