| Literature DB >> 29211008 |
Iqramul Haq1, Saifullah Sakib2, Ashis Talukder3.
Abstract
Contraceptive use among married women of reproductive age has showed a substantial progress over the last few decades in Bangladesh. This study explores the sociodemographic factors associated with contraceptive use among ever-married women of reproductive age in Bangladesh by utilizing the information extracted from three of the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys (BDHSs) in 1993-1994, 2004 and 2014. Bivariate analysis was conducted by performing chi-squared test of independence to explore the relationship between selected sociodemographic factors and dependent variables. To know the adjusted effects of covariates, a popular binary logistic regression model was considered. Respondents' current age, place residence, division religion, education, age at first marriage, family planning (FP) media exposure, ideal number of children and fertility preferences are the significant determinants according to the most recent survey, BDHS 2014. However, wealth index and a respondent's current working status were found to be significant factors only in BDHS 2004. The results of the study strongly recommend efforts to increase the education level among poor people, particularly among women in Bangladesh. Program interventions, including health behavior education and family planning services and counselling, are especially needed for some categories of the population, including those living in rural areas, Sylhet, Chittagong and Dhaka divisions, as well as illiterate and Muslim ever-married women.Entities:
Keywords: Demographic and Health Survey; contraceptive use; ever-married women; family planning; logistic regression; sociodemographic factors
Year: 2017 PMID: 29211008 PMCID: PMC5753660 DOI: 10.3390/medsci5040031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3271
Percentage distribution of characteristics of the respondents, 1993–1994, 2004 and 2014 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys (BDHSs).
| Characteristics | BDHS 1993–1994 | BDHS 2004 | BDHS 2014 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of Women | (%) | No. of Women | (%) | No. of Women | (%) | |
| 15–19 | 1271 | 13.4 | 1598 | 14.2 | 2029 | 11.4 |
| 20–24 | 2033 | 21.4 | 2202 | 19.5 | 3224 | 18.0 |
| 25–29 | 2012 | 21.2 | 2013 | 17.8 | 3390 | 19.0 |
| 30–34 | 1456 | 15.3 | 1793 | 15.9 | 3047 | 17.1 |
| 35–39 | 1197 | 12.6 | 1457 | 12.9 | 2315 | 13.0 |
| 40–44 | 871 | 9.2 | 1160 | 10.3 | 2092 | 11.7 |
| 45–49 | 655 | 6.9 | 1066 | 9.4 | 1766 | 9.9 |
| Barisal | 600 | 6.3 | 710 | 6.3 | 1111 | 6.3 |
| Chittagong | 2503 | 26.4 | 2023 | 17.9 | 3301 | 17.9 |
| Dhaka | 2907 | 30.6 | 3521 | 31.2 | 6223 | 31.2 |
| Khulna | 1203 | 12.7 | 1373 | 12.2 | 1838 | 12.2 |
| Rajshahi | 2281 | 24.0 | 2946 | 26.1 | 2103 | 26.1 |
| Rangpur | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2056 | NA |
| Sylhet | NA | NA | 717 | 6.4 | 1232 | 6.4 |
| No education | 5529 | 58.2 | 4694 | 41.6 | 4455 | 24.9 |
| Primary | 2542 | 26.8 | 3300 | 29.2 | 5209 | 29.2 |
| Above secondary | 1425 | 15.0 | 3296 | 29.2 | 8199 | 45.9 |
| Urban | 1096 | 11.5 | 2551 | 22.6 | 5047 | 28.3 |
| Rural | 8399 | 88.5 | 8740 | 77.4 | 12,816 | 71.7 |
| Islam | 8332 | 87.8 | 10,165 | 90.0 | 16,096 | 90.1 |
| Others | 1163 | 12.2 | 1126 | 10.0 | 1767 | 9.9 |
| No | 5175 | 54.5 | 6469 | 57.3 | 14,316 | 80.1 |
| Yes | 4320 | 45.5 | 4822 | 42.7 | 3547 | 19.9 |
| <18 | 8349 | 87.9 | 9739 | 86.3 | 13,657 | 76.5 |
| 18+ | 1146 | 12.1 | 1552 | 13.7 | 4206 | 23.5 |
| Poor | 3821 | 40.2 | 4499 | 39.8 | 6767 | 37.9 |
| Middle | 1570 | 16.5 | 4564 | 19.7 | 3560 | 19.9 |
| Rich | 4103 | 43.2 | 2228 | 40.4 | 7536 | 42.2 |
| No | 7971 | 84.0 | 8747 | 77.5 | 11,947 | 66.9 |
| Yes | 1517 | 16.0 | 2543 | 22.5 | 5912 | 33.1 |
| 0–1 | 156 | 1.6 | 288 | 2.6 | 1127 | 6.3 |
| 2–3 | 7265 | 76.5 | 9425 | 83.5 | 12,921 | 85.7 |
| 4+ | 2074 | 21.8 | 1577 | 14.0 | 3816 | 8.0 |
| No more | 4292 | 48.4 | 5660 | 50.1 | 9555 | 56.7 |
| Have another | 3227 | 36.4 | 3561 | 31.6 | 5293 | 31.4 |
| Undecided | 209 | 2.4 | 217 | 1.9 | 462 | 2.7 |
| Declared infecund | 282 | 3.2 | 379 | 3.4 | 561 | 3.3 |
| Not using | 5481 | 57.7 | 5140 | 45.5 | 7336 | 41.1 |
| Using | 4014 | 42.3 | 6152 | 54.5 | 10,527 | 58.9 |
FP: Family Planning; NA: not available; No.: Number.
Percentage distribution of use of modern contraception among ever-married women age 15–49, by selected background characteristics, BDHSs 1993–1994, 2004 and 2014.
| Characteristics | BDHS 1993–1994 | BDHS 2004 | BDHS 2014 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contraception Using Status | Contraception Using Status | Contraception Using Status | ||||
| Yes (%) | No (%) | Yes (%) | No (%) | Yes (%) | No (%) | |
| 15–19 | 23.8 | 76.2 | 40.6 | 59.4 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| 20–24 | 36.4 | 63.6 | 51.0 | 49.0 | 58.1 | 41.9 |
| 25–29 | 48.3 | 51.7 | 58.9 | 41.1 | 64.9 | 35.1 |
| 30–34 | 53.5 | 46.5 | 64.5 | 35.5 | 70.6 | 29.4 |
| 35–39 | 53.8 | 46.2 | 65.3 | 34.7 | 67.8 | 32.2 |
| 40–44 | 46.8 | 53.2 | 56.0 | 44.0 | 54.5 | 45.5 |
| 45–49 | 25.7 | 74.3 | 40.9 | 59.1 | 32.6 | 67.4 |
| Barisal | 45.3 | 54.7 | 51.5 | 48.5 | 59.9 | 40.1 |
| Chittagong | 27.4 | 72.6 | 43.9 | 56.1 | 52.0 | 48.0 |
| Dhaka | 42.0 | 58.2 | 55.8 | 44.2 | 59.2 | 40.8 |
| Khulna | 53.0 | 57.0 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 63.1 | 36.9 |
| Rajshahi | 52.5 | 47.5 | 64.6 | 38.4 | 66.2 | 33.8 |
| Rangpur | NA | NA | NA | NA | 66.1 | 33.9 |
| Sylhet | NA | NA | 28.4 | 71.6 | 44.5 | 55.5 |
| No education | 38.1 | 61.9 | 53.2 | 46.8 | 54.5 | 45.5 |
| Primary | 44.4 | 55.6 | 54.5 | 45.5 | 59.6 | 40.4 |
| Above secondary | 54.7 | 45.3 | 56.2 | 43.8 | 60.9 | 39.1 |
| Urban | 50.9 | 49.1 | 58.5 | 41.5 | 61.5 | 38.5 |
| Rural | 41.1 | 58.9 | 53.3 | 46.7 | 57.9 | 42.1 |
| Islam | 41.1 | 58.9 | 53.7 | 46.3 | 58.2 | 41.8 |
| Others | 50.9 | 49.1 | 61.8 | 38.2 | 65.6 | 34.4 |
| No | 38.6 | 61.4 | 51.6 | 48.4 | 58.2 | 41.8 |
| Yes | 46.7 | 53.3 | 58.3 | 41.7 | 61.7 | 38.3 |
| <18 | 42.9 | 57.1 | 55.0 | 45.0 | 59.5 | 40.5 |
| 18+ | 37.9 | 62.1 | 51.3 | 48.7 | 57.0 | 43.0 |
| Poor | 38.9 | 61.1 | 51.6 | 48.4 | 58.7 | 41.3 |
| Middle | 42.4 | 57.6 | 54.7 | 45.3 | 59.7 | 40.3 |
| Rich | 45.4 | 54.6 | 57.2 | 42.8 | 58.7 | 41.3 |
| No | 41.3 | 58.7 | 54.2 | 45.8 | 57.5 | 42.5 |
| Yes | 47.3 | 52.7 | 55.6 | 44.4 | 61.9 | 38.1 |
| 0–1 | 48.1 | 51.9 | 61.6 | 38.4 | 64.3 | 35.7 |
| 2–3 | 46.2 | 53.8 | 56.8 | 43.2 | 59.8 | 40.2 |
| 4+ | 28.2 | 71.8 | 39.1 | 60.9 | 45.5 | 54.5 |
| No more | 50.8 | 49.2 | 67.3 | 32.7 | 68.3 | 31.7 |
| Have another | 28.6 | 71.4 | 44.6 | 55.4 | 51.8 | 48.2 |
| Undecided | 16.7 | 83.3 | 40.1 | 59.9 | 52.8 | 47.2 |
| Declared infecund | 2.5 | 97.5 | 0.5 | 99.5 | 6.1 | 93.9 |
Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of explanatory variables for the use of modern contraception among ever-married women in Bangladesh, in 1993–1994, 2004 and 2014 obtained from logistic regression model.
| Characteristics | BDHS 1993–1994 | BDHS 2004 | BDHS 2014 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI Lower-Upper | OR | 95% CI Lower-Upper | OR | 95% CI Lower-Upper | |
| 15–19 (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| 20–24 | 1.60 *** | 1.35–1.90 | 1.52 *** | 1.32–1.75 | 1.25 *** | 1.12–1.41 |
| 25–29 | 2.38 *** | 1.99–2.85 | 1.97 *** | 1.69–2.30 | 1.39 *** | 1.22–1.57 |
| 30–34 | 2.74 *** | 2.25–3.33 | 2.48 *** | 2.09–2.93 | 1.66 *** | 1.45–1.92 |
| 35–39 | 2.86 *** | 2.32–3.51 | 2.51 *** | 2.09–3.01 | 1.44 *** | 1.24–1.68 |
| 40–44 | 2.38 *** | 1.90–2.98 | 1.91 *** | 1.57–2.32 | 0.85 *** | 0.73–0.99 |
| 45–49 | 1.03 *** | 1.07–1.63 | 1.28 *** | 1.05–1.57 | 0.36 *** | 0.30–0.42 |
| Barisal (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Chittagong | 0.55 *** | 0.45–0.67 | 0.73 ** | 0.61–0.87 | 0.72 *** | 0.62–0.84 |
| Dhaka | 0.99 | 0.82–1.21 | 1.17 | 0.98–1.39 | 1.01 | 0.88–1.17 |
| Khulna | 1.61 *** | 1.30–1.99 | 1.36 ** | 1.12–1.65 | 1.20 * | 1.02–1.41 |
| Rajshahi | 1.60 *** | 1.31–1.96 | 1.82 *** | 1.53–2.18 | 1.37 *** | 1.17–1.60 |
| Rangpur | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.40 *** | 1.20–1.65 |
| Sylhet | NA | NA | 0.38 *** | 0.30–0.49 | 0.57 *** | 0.48–0.68 |
| No education (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Primary | 1.26 *** | 1.13–1.41 | 1.12 * | 1.01–1.24 | 1.16 ** | 1.06–1.26 |
| Above secondary | 2.17 *** | 1.87–2.53 | 1.34 *** | 1.19–1.50 | 1.23 *** | 1.11–1.35 |
| Urban (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Rural | 0.87 | 0.75–1.01 | 0.87 ** | 0.78–0.96 | 0.84 *** | 0.77–0.91 |
| Islam(ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Others | 1.40 *** | 1.21–1.60 | 1.56 *** | 1.36–1.80 | 1.36 *** | 1.21–1.52 |
| No (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 1.16 ** | 1.02–1.31 | 1.20 *** | 1.10–1.32 | 1.10 * | 1.01–1.20 |
| <18 (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| 18+ | 0.70 *** | 0.61–0.82 | 0.79 *** | 0.70–0.89 | 0.89 ** | 0.83–0.97 |
| Poor (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Middle | 1.09 | 0.96–1.25 | 1.12 * | 1.02–1.26 | 1.09 | 0.99–1.19 |
| Rich | 1.02 | 0.90–1.15 | 1.19 ** | 1.06–1.32 | 1.01 | 0.92–1.10 |
| No (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 0.99 | 0.87–1.11 | 0.82 *** | 0.75–0.91 | 1.07 | 0.90–1.14 |
| 0–1 (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| 2–3 | 1.31 | 0.93–1.85 | 0.96 | 0.74–1.24 | 0.98 | 0.86–1.12 |
| 4+ | 0.81 | 0.56–1.16 | 0.63 ** | 0.48–0.84 | 0.77 ** | 0.65–0.92 |
| No more (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Have another | 0.45 *** | 0.40–0.51 | 0.58 *** | 0.52–0.65 | 0.50 *** | 0.46–0.55 |
| Undecided | 0.26 *** | 0.18–0.38 | 0.48 *** | 0.36–0.64 | 0.49 *** | 0.41–0.60 |
| Declared infecund | 0.03 *** | 0.02–0.07 | 0.03 *** | 0.01–0.06 | 0.05 *** | 0.03–0.07 |
ref: reference group; Statistical significance: * p < 0.05, ** p <0.01, *** p < 0.001.