| Literature DB >> 29210993 |
Toshikazu Tanaka1, Tohru Yoneyama2, Daisuke Noro3, Kengo Imanishi4, Yuta Kojima5, Shingo Hatakeyama6, Yuki Tobisawa7, Kazuyuki Mori8, Hayato Yamamoto9, Atsushi Imai10, Takahiro Yoneyama11, Yasuhiro Hashimoto12, Takuya Koie13, Masakazu Tanaka14, Shin-Ichiro Nishimura15, Shizuka Kurauchi16, Ippei Takahashi17, Chikara Ohyama18,19.
Abstract
The aim of this study to determine whether the aberrant N-glycosylated serum immunoglobulins (Igs) can be applied as a diagnostic marker of urothelial carcinoma (UC). Between 2009 and 2016, we randomly obtained serum available from 237 UC and also 96 prostate cancer as other cancer controls from our serum bank and also obtained-from 339 healthy volunteers (HV)-controls obtained from community-dwelling volunteers in Iwaki Health Promotion Project. A total of 32 types of N-glycan levels on Igs were determined by high-throughput N-glycomics and analyzed by multivariable discriminant analysis. We found five UC-associated aberrant N-glycans changes on Igs and also found that asialo-bisecting GlcNAc type N-glycan on Igs were significantly accumulated in UC patients. The diagnostic N-glycan Score (dNGScore) established by combination of five N-glycans on Igs discriminated UC patients from HV and prostate cancer (PC) patients with 92.8% sensitivity and 97.2% specificity. The area under the curve (AUC) for of the dNGScore was 0.969 for UC detection that was much superior to that of urine cytology (AUC, 0.707) and hematuria (AUC, 0.892). Furthermore, dNGScore can detect hematuria and urine cytology negative patients. The dNGscore based on aberrant N-glycosylation signatures of Igs were found to be promising diagnostic biomarkers of UCs.Entities:
Keywords: N-glycomics; aberrant N-glycosylation; diagnostic biomarker; immunogloburins; upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma; urothelial carcinoma of the bladder
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29210993 PMCID: PMC5751235 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18122632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure A1The general protocol for the integrated glycoblotting technique and workflow for glycoblotting-based high-throughput clinical glycan analysis. (a) Ten-microliter serum Ig fraction samples were applied to SweetBlot™ (System Instruments, Hachioji, Japan) for glycoblotting; (b) Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB)-stained band patterns on a sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel for representative whole serum and purified Ig fraction samples; (c) After enzymatic N-glycan cleavage from Ig proteins, the total N-glycans released into the digestion mixture were directly mixed with BlotGlyco H beads (Sumitomo Bakelite, Co., Tokyo, Japan) to capture N-glycans; (d) After the beads were separated from other molecules by washing, sialic acid was methyl esterified; (e) These processed N-glycans were then labelled with benzyloxyamine (BOA) and released from BlotGlyco H beads; (f) Mass spectra of BOA-labelled N-glycans from Ig fractions were acquired using an Ultraflex III instrument (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). Total 32 type of N-glycans were identified in Igs fraction. Identified N-glycan structures are indicated by monosaccharide symbols: white circles, galactose (Gal); black circles, mannose (Man); black squares, N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc); black triangle, fucose (Fuc) and black diamonds, sialic acid.
Thirty-two types of N-glycans that showed good quantitative reproducibility in all Igs fraction samples and could be analyzed statistically.
| # | Composition | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1362.5 | (Hex)2 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 2 | 1524.5 | (Hex)3 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 3 | 1565.5 | (Hex)5 + (HexNAc)3 |
| 4 | 1590.6 | (HexNAc)2(dHex)1 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 5 | 1606.6 | (Hex)1(HexNAc)2 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 6 | 1647.6 | (HexNAc)3 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 7 | 1686.6 | (Hex)4 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 8 | 1708.6 | (Hex)1(HexNAc)1(NeuAc)1 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 9 | 1752.6 | (Hex)1(HexNAc)2(dHex)1 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 10 | 1768.6 | (Hex)2(HexNAc)2 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 11 | 1793.7 | (HexNAc)3(dHex)1 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 12 | 1809.7 | (Hex)1(HexNAc)3 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 13 | 1848.6 | (Hex)5 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 14 | 1870.7 | (Hex)2(HexNAc)1(NeuAc)1 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 15 | 1914.7 | (Hex)2(HexNAc)2(dHex)1 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 16 | 1955.7 | (Hex)1(HexNAc)3(dHex)1 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 17 | 2010.7 | (Hex)6 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 18 | 2032.7 | (Hex)3(HexNac)1(NeuAc)1 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 19 | 2057.8 | (Hex)1(HexNAc)2(dHex)1(NeuAc)1+ (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 20 | 2073.8 | (Hex)2(HexNAc)2(NeuAc)1+ (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 21 | 2117.8 | (Hex)2(HexNAc)3(dHex)1 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 22 | 2219.8 | (Hex)2(HexNAc)2(dHex)1(NeuAc)1 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 23 | 2336.9 | (Hex)3(HexNAc)4 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| IS | 2348.9 1 | Internal standard (BOA-labeled A2 amide) |
| 24 | 2378.9 | (Hex)2(HexNAc)2(NeuAc)2 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 25 | 2422.9 | (Hex)2(HexNAc)3(dHex)1(NeuAc)1 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 26 | 2524.9 | (Hex)2(HexNAc)2(dHex)1(NeuAc)2 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 27 | 2727.9 | (Hex)2(HexNAc)3(dHex)1(NeuAc)2 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 28 | 2743.9 | (Hex)3(HexNAc)3(NeuAc)2 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 29 | 2890.1 | (Hex)3(HexNAc)3(dHex)1(NeuAc)2 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 30 | 3049.1 | (Hex)3(HexNAc)3(NeuAc)3 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 31 | 3195.2 | (Hex)3(HexNAc)3(dHex)1(NeuAc)3 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
| 32 | 3341.2 | (Hex)3 (HexNAc)3 (Deoxyhexose)2 (NeuAc)3 + (Man)3(GlcNAc)2 |
1 m/z 2348.9 is the internal standard, disialo-galactosylated biantennary N-glycan, which contains amidated sialic acid residues (A2 amide glycans). Compositional annotations and putative structures are represented by the following abbreviations. Hex: hexose, HexNAc: N-acetylhexosamine, dHex: deoxyhexose.
Patients’ demographics in each cohort.
| Non-UC a | UC b | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HV | PC | |||||
| Total patients ( | 339 | 96 | 237 | |||
| Sex (Male, %) | 122 (36.0) | 96 (100) | 191 (80.6) | <0.001 | ||
| Median age (IQR 1) | 68.0 (63–73) | 74.0 (68–78) | 70.0 (62–75) | 0.700 | ||
| Former or current smoker | 75 (22.1) | 18 (18.8) | 71 (29.9) | 0.101 | ||
| Stone former | 4 (1.2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.184 | ||
| BPH 2 | 7 (2.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.145 | ||
| HSPC 3 | 0 (0) | 96 (100) | 0 (0) | <0.001 | ||
| hematuria+ | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 186 (78.5) | <0.001 | ||
| Urine Cytology Class | ||||||
| I, II | 81 (34.2) | |||||
| III | 58 (24.5) | |||||
| IV | 16 (6.7) | |||||
| V | 82 (34.6) | |||||
| Tumor Location of UC | ||||||
| Bladder | 177 (67.6) | |||||
| Renal pelvis | 27 (11.4) | |||||
| Ureter | 28 (11.8) | |||||
| Multiple | 4 (1.7) | |||||
| Tumor Grade of UC | ||||||
| Low grade noninvasive | 68 (28.7) | |||||
| High grade noninvasive | 43 (18.1) | |||||
| Muscle invasive | 109 (45.9) | |||||
| Lymph node stage N1 | 0 (0.0) | 20 (8.4) | 0.115 | |||
| Metastatic disease | 4 (4.2) | 47 (19.8) | 0.010 | |||
1 IQR, Interquartile range; 2 BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; 3 HSPC, hormone sensitive prostate cancer; HV: healthy volunteers; PC: prostate cancer. a non-urothelial carcinoma, non-UC; b urothelial carcinoma, UC.
Figure 1Five UC-associated N-glycan levels of immunoglobulins (Igs) fractions. (a) Complex biantennary-type N-glycan (m/z 1606, 1769 and 2074) levels and (b) fucosylated bisecting GlcNAc-type N-glycan (m/z 2118 and 2423) of the Ig fractions in the UC, HV and PC groups. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. Intergroup differences were statistically compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test for non-normally distributed models; (c) Synthetic pathway of candidate N-glycans in the present study. Red up- and downward arrows indicates significantly changed in UC compare with HV group. Cyan up- and downward arrows indicates significantly changed in UC compare with PC group. The equals mark indicates that it did not significantly change. N-glycan structures are indicated by monosaccharide symbols: white circles, galactose (Gal); black circles, mannose (Man); black squares, N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc); black triangle, fucose (Fuc) and black diamonds, sialic acid. β4GalT: β1,4-galactosyltransferase, GnT-III: N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-III, FUT8: fucosyltransferase 8, ST: sialyltransferase.
Multivariable discriminant analysis for prediction of UCs.
| Variables | Wilks’ Lambda | ODF 1 | TDF 2 | Discriminant Function | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.9742 | 17.72 | 1 | 670 | <0.001 | 0.1925 | |
| 0.9707 | 20.24 | 1 | 670 | <0.001 | 0.4932 | |
| 0.9377 | 44.54 | 1 | 670 | <0.001 | 0.4941 | |
| 0.5894 | 466.73 | 1 | 670 | <0.001 | ‒3.2460 | |
| 0.9984 | 1.04 | 1 | 670 | <0.001 | 0.6179 | |
| Constant term | ‒0.4905 | |||||
1 ODF, one degree of freedom; 2 TDF, two degrees of freedom.
Figure 2Serum immunoglobulin (Ig) levels in UC (UC of the bladder (UCB) and upper urinary tract UC (UTUC)) patients and healthy volunteers (HVs) and prostate cancer (PC). (a) Serum total Igs (sum of IgG1-4, IgM and IgA) levels in the UC, HV and PC groups; (b) Serum total IgG (IgG1-4) levels in the UC, HV and PC groups; (c) Serum IgM levels in the UC, HV and PC groups; (d) Serum IgA levels in the UC, HV and PC groups. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. Intergroup differences were statistically compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test for non-normally distributed models.
Figure 3Clinical significance of diagnostic N-glycan score. (a) The diagnostic N-glycan score (dNGScore) level was significantly higher in the UC (UCB and UTUC) group than in the HV and PC group; (b) ROC curve analysis of dNGScore, hematuria and urine cytological results for detection of UC (UCB and UTUC); (c) Waterfall plot of dNGScore; (d) Association between dNGScore level and hematuria status; (e) Association between dNGScore level and urine cytology; (f) Association between dNGScore level and tumor invasiveness. NMIBC: non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, MIBC: muscle invasive bladder cancer, NI-UTUC: noninvasive UTUC, I-UTUC: invasive UTUC. Intergroup differences were statistically compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test for non-normally distributed models and performed permutation test.
Comparing diagnostic performance of UCs on each test.
| Variables | AUC | 95% CI | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hematuria | 0.892 | 0.861–0.924 | 78.5 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 89.5 |
| Urine cytology | 0.707 | 0.661–0.753 | 41.4 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 75.8 |
| d | 0.969 | 0.952–0.986 | 92.8 | 97.2 | 94.8 | 96.1 |
| d | 0.993 | 0.982–0.100 | 98.3 | 97.2 | 93.5 | 99.3 |
| d | 0.907 | 0.854–0.959 | 77.1 | 97.2 | 79.7 | 96.8 |
1 dNGScore, diagnostic N-glycan score.