AIM: To compare outcomes of continuous subcutaneous infusion of local anesthetic and epidural analgesia following the Nuss procedure. PATIENTS & METHODS: A retrospective chart review compared patients managed with subcutaneous local anesthetic infusion (n = 12) versus thoracic epidural (n = 19) following the Nuss procedure from March 2013 to June 2015. RESULTS: There was no difference in hospital length of stay or days on intravenous narcotics. Epidural catheter placement prolonged operating room time (146.58 ± 28.30 vs 121.42 ± 21.98 min, p = 0.01). Average pain scores were slightly higher in the subcutaneous infusion group (3.72 ± 1.62 vs 2.35 ± 0.95, p = 0.02), but of negligible clinical significance. CONCLUSION: Continuous subcutaneous infusion of local anesthetic could eliminate the need for thoracic epidural for pain management after the Nuss procedure.
AIM: To compare outcomes of continuous subcutaneous infusion of local anesthetic and epidural analgesia following the Nuss procedure. PATIENTS & METHODS: A retrospective chart review compared patients managed with subcutaneous local anesthetic infusion (n = 12) versus thoracic epidural (n = 19) following the Nuss procedure from March 2013 to June 2015. RESULTS: There was no difference in hospital length of stay or days on intravenous narcotics. Epidural catheter placement prolonged operating room time (146.58 ± 28.30 vs 121.42 ± 21.98 min, p = 0.01). Average pain scores were slightly higher in the subcutaneous infusion group (3.72 ± 1.62 vs 2.35 ± 0.95, p = 0.02), but of negligible clinical significance. CONCLUSION: Continuous subcutaneous infusion of local anesthetic could eliminate the need for thoracic epidural for pain management after the Nuss procedure.