| Literature DB >> 29210064 |
S A Hosgood1, E Thompson2, T Moore1, C H Wilson2, M L Nicholson1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys are declined for transplantation because of concerns over their quality. Ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) provides a unique opportunity to assess the quality of a kidney and determine its suitability for transplantation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29210064 PMCID: PMC5887977 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10733
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Surg ISSN: 0007-1323 Impact factor: 6.939
Donor and surgical demographics for phase 1
| Reason for decline | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inadequate | Malignancy ( | Technical factor/ injury ( | Long CIT ( | HMP parameters ( | Past medical history ( | |
| Age (years) | 54(16) | 67(4) | 63(7) | 73(6) | 66(5) | 46(19) |
| Sex ratio (M : F) | 14 : 4 | 0 : 2 | 2 : 3 | 5 : 3 | 3 : 1 | 5 : 0 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25·7(4·6) | 34·7(13·1) | 30·6(14·5) | 26·0(3·7) | 30·4(10·2) | 24·2(0·6) |
| KDRI† | 1·32 | 1·97 | 1·40 | 2·57 | 1·73 | 1·05 |
| (0·80–2·17) | (1·96–1·97) | (1·27–1·51) | (1·72–2·67) | (1·56–1·86) | (0·82–2·03) | |
| Cause of death | ||||||
| Intracranial haemorrhage | 11 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Pulmonary disease | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Congestive cardiac failure | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hypoxic brain injury | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Cardiac arrest | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Myocardial infarct | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Creatinine before retrieval (µmol/l) | 89(36) | 203(152) | 81(61) | 118(21) | 133(111) | 293(166) |
| WIT (min) | 12(2) | 14(1) | 12(7) | 14(4) | 16(2) | 12(2) |
| CIT (h) | 24·2(15·9) | 23·4(15·7) | 31·2(5·4) | 23·2(10·5) | 28·4(10·7) | 25·5(3·2) |
Values are
mean(s.d.) and
median (range). CIT, cold ischaemia time; HMP, hypothermic machine perfusion; KDRI, Kidney Donor Risk Index; WIT, warm ischaemia time.
Reason for decline and normothermic perfusion quality assessment score in phase 1
| Quality assessment score | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1–3 | 4–5 | |
| Inadequate perfusion | 14 | 4 |
| Malignancy | 2 | 0 |
| Technical/anatomical | 5 | 0 |
| Long CIT | 3 | 5 |
| HMP parameters | 2 | 2 |
| Past medical history | 2 | 3 |
| Total | 28 | 14 |
CIT, cold ischaemia time; HMP, hypothermic machine perfusion.
Figure 1Phase 2 study: flow diagram listing the number of offers, kidneys not recruited, reasons for national decline, reasons for non‐recruitment, number of kidneys recruited and assessed, and reasons for decline and for not transplanting. DCD, donation after circulatory death; WIT, warm ischaemia time; CIT, cold ischaemia time; QAS, quality assessment score
Clinical data for transplanted kidneys and demographics of the recipients
| K01 | K02 | K05 | K08 | K09 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transplanted kidneys | |||||
| First CIT (h) | 17·4 | 19·7 | 18·9 | 7·8 | 9·5 |
| NMP (min) | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| Second CIT (min) | 132 | 247 | 187 | 503 | 187 |
| Anastomosis (min) | 33 | 33 | 39 | 34 | 38 |
| Total duration of ischaemia (h) | 21·2 | 26·4 | 23·7 | 17·8 | 14·2 |
| Recipients | |||||
| Age | 30 | 68 | 55 | 49 | 45 |
| Sex | M | F | M | M | M |
| HLA mismatch | 0‐1‐1 | 2‐1‐0 | 2‐2‐0 | 2‐1‐0 | 2‐1‐0 |
| Previous transplant | No | No | No | Yes 1 | No |
| Dialysis | HD | CAPD | HD | HD | CAPD |
| Delayed graft function | No | No | Yes | No | No |
| Creatinine (μmol/l) | |||||
| Before transplant | 834 | 558 | 733 | 741 | 588 |
| 7 days | 115 | 550 | 681 | 600 | 311 |
| 1 month | 101 | 143 | 514 | 155 | 175 |
| 3 months | 106 | 143 | 408 | 116 | 167 |
| 6 months | 124 | 192 | 292 | ||
| Acute rejection | No | No | No | No | No |
| Duration of hospital stay (days) | 5 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 6 |
CIT, cold ischaemia time; NMP, normothermic machine perfusion; HD, haemodialysis; CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.
Figure 2a Mean(s.d.) renal blood flow during normothermic perfusion of the transplanted and non‐transplanted kidneys and b total urine output. Values for individual patients are also shown