Literature DB >> 29209960

Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Integrative Medicine in Chinese Need Regulation and Monitoring Urgently and Some Suggestions for Its Solutions.

Jia-Ying Wang1, Gui-Hua Tian2,3, You-Ping Li3, Tai-Xiang Wu3, Zhao-Xiang Bian4, Liang Du3, Hong-Cai Shang5.   

Abstract

With the introduction and development of evidence-based medicine in China, it has been spread rapidly in the area of integrative medicine (IM) and has become a new unique discipline. During almost 20 years, as one of the most important parts of evidence-based IM, systematic review (SR)/meta-analysis (MA) of IM have shown a good development momentum in the aspects of quantity, depth, breadth and influence, but also face the harsh situation of the uncontrolled quantity and quality, especially for SRs in Chinese. Therefore, how to supervise and standardize this area effectively becomes a problem to be solved. Based on the experience both at home and abroad, the authors put forward several kinds of solutions for laying the foundation for further development such as promoting the registration system of SR/MA of IM, effectively setting up the regulatory platform of quality and quantity, launching professional training for SR/MA reviewers, forming qualification registration, developing the data transfer and sharing platform to realize the transparency of evidence process.

Keywords:  integrative medicine; regulation and monitoring; systematic review in Chinese

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29209960     DOI: 10.1007/s11655-017-2427-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin J Integr Med        ISSN: 1672-0415            Impact factor:   1.978


  7 in total

1.  Review of randomised controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine.

Authors:  J L Tang; S Y Zhan; E Ernst
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-17

2.  Evidence-based complementary medicine: a contradiction in terms?

Authors:  E Ernst
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 3.  Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions.

Authors:  David Evans
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.036

4.  [Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews correlated to traditional Chinese medicine published in China].

Authors:  Dan Hu; De-ying Kang; Yu-xia Wu
Journal:  Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi       Date:  2011-03

5.  Clinical practice guideline: Allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Michael D Seidman; Richard K Gurgel; Sandra Y Lin; Seth R Schwartz; Fuad M Baroody; James R Bonner; Douglas E Dawson; Mark S Dykewicz; Jesse M Hackell; Joseph K Han; Stacey L Ishman; Helene J Krouse; Sonya Malekzadeh; James Whit W Mims; Folashade S Omole; William D Reddy; Dana V Wallace; Sandra A Walsh; Barbara E Warren; Meghan N Wilson; Lorraine C Nnacheta
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 6.  Compound Salvia droplet pill, a traditional Chinese medicine, for the treatment of unstable angina pectoris: a systematic review.

Authors:  Junhua Zhang; Hongcai Shang; Xiumei Gao; Boli Zhang; Yaozu Xiang; Hongbo Cao; Ming Ren; Hui Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2008-01

Review 7.  Clinical research of traditional chinese medicine needs to develop its own system of core outcome sets.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Junhua Zhang; Jing Chen; Dongmei Xing; Wei Mu; Jiaying Wang; Hongcai Shang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.629

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Association of HLA-DR3 and HLA-DR15 Polymorphisms with Risk of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Ke Xue; Wen-Quan Niu; Yong Cui
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.