Literature DB >> 29209818

Water quality of stormwater generated from an airport in a cold climate, function of an infiltration pond, and sampling strategy with limited resources.

Yu Jia1,2, Ludwig Ehlert3, Cecilia Wahlskog4, Angela Lundberg4, Christian Maurice4,3.   

Abstract

Monitoring pollutants in stormwater discharge in cold climates is challenging. An environmental survey was performed by sampling the stormwater from Luleå Airport, Northern Sweden, during the period 2010-2013, when urea was used as a main component of aircraft deicing/anti-icing fluids (ADAFs). The stormwater collected from the runway was led through an oil trap to an infiltration pond to store excess water during precipitation periods and enhance infiltration and water treatment. Due to insufficient capacity, an emergency spillway was established and equipped with a flow meter and an automatic sampler. This study proposes a program for effective monitoring of pollutant discharge with a minimum number of sampling occasions when use of automatic samplers is not possible. The results showed that 90% of nitrogen discharge occurs during late autumn before the water pipes freeze and during snow melting, regardless of the precipitation during the remaining months when the pollutant discharge was negligible. The concentrations of other constituents in the discharge were generally low compared to guideline values. The best data quality was obtained using flow controlled sampling. Intensive time-controlled sampling during late autumn (few weeks) and snow melting (2 weeks) would be sufficient for necessary information. The flow meters installed at the rectangular notch appeared to be difficult to calibrate and gave contradictory results. Overall, the spillway was dry, as water infiltrated into the pond, and stagnant water close to the edge might be registered as flow. Water level monitoring revealed that the infiltration capacity gradually decreased with time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deicer components; Infiltration pond; Sampling strategy; Seasonal effect; Stormwater; Urea

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29209818     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-017-6375-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  5 in total

1.  Best management practices for airport deicing stormwater.

Authors:  M S Switzenbaum; S Veltman; D Mericas; B Wagoner; T Schoenberg
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  The impact of airport de-icing on a river: the case of the Ouseburn, Newcastle upon Tyne.

Authors:  D A Turnbull; J R Bevan
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Improved management of winter operations to limit subsurface contamination with degradable deicing chemicals in cold regions.

Authors:  Helen K French; Sjoerd E A T M van der Zee
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Biological removal of nitrogen from wastewater.

Authors:  Guibing Zhu; Yongzhen Peng; Baikun Li; Jianhua Guo; Qing Yang; Shuying Wang
Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.563

5.  Aquatic toxicity of airfield-pavement deicer materials and implications for airport runoff.

Authors:  Steven R Corsi; Steven W Geis; George Bowman; Greg G Failey; Troy D Rutter
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.